This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed Tuesday a $465 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for public nuisance through its prescription opioid marketing campaign in the state. This plan appropriated money to 21 government programs to combat opioid abuse statewide.
Share At the last Supreme Court oral argument of Justice Stephen Breyer’s career, the court stepped into a dispute over the state of Oklahoma’s criminal jurisdiction authority in Indian country. Oklahoma v. Oklahoma , which reaffirmed that the reservation of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation within Oklahoma remains “Indian country.”
Government, despite their origins. “In The experts filing argued that ultimately, CFR courts are functionally tribal courts, just tribal courts that receive funding and operational support from the federal government. Justices heard arguments in Oklahoma v. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the dissent.
Under the Speedy Trial Act, the government must file an indictment within 30 days of arresting someone, and the trial must begin within 70 days of the indictment. If the government fails to meet these deadlines, the defendant can move to dismiss the indictment. City of Edmond, Oklahoma v. BNSF Railway Company.
First, the court resolves a statute of limitations issue. ” Thus, the plaintiff’s lawsuit was brought within the applicable two-year statute of limitations when he filed suit on his 20th birthday. City of Fontana , that is.
United States , which examines whether the federal government can bring criminal charges in federal court against a defendant previously found guilty in a Court of Indian Offenses for an offense stemming from the same act. Kimberly responded that there are two easy fixes, both of which, he asserted, respect tribal sovereignty.
There are several statutes that form the basis of our antitrust laws. Most states have parallel laws governing competitive behavior at the state level. The First Amendment gives citizens a right to free speech and assembly, and “to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Oklahoma Federal Court Allowed Landowner to Proceed with NEPA Challenge of Osage Nation Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the Northern District of Oklahoma denied non-federal defendants’ motion to dismiss a landowner’s lawsuit claiming that the U.S. Optimus Steel, LLC v. Army Corps of Engineers , No. 19-1230 (D.C.
In the complaint filed with the District Court of Southern Iowa, the groups claim that Iowa has exceeded its power by intruding on areas of law reserved to the federal government. They first argue that the federal government has exclusive power to regulate immigration and that Iowa’s law conflicts with federal immigration statutes.
Hendrix turns on the interpretation of the federal habeas statute, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. The statute replaced the habeas remedy with the motion to vacate, unless the “remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [the prisoner’s] detention.”
In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” Last up: Looks like Oklahoma will have to update its environmental impact statement for its blizzard of petitions seeking to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt v.
Circuit upheld the regulation, holding that “the disputed rule is consistent with the best interpretation of ‘machine gun’ under the governingstatutes.” The government seeks review in Cargill , which it says provides the best vehicle of the three. In Cargill , the en banc U.S. relisted after the Oct. relisted after the Sept.
Sylvia Gonzalez, a newly elected Texas city council member elected on an anti-corruption platform was arrested after her first meeting for “intentionally … conceal[ing] … a government record,” for allegedly taking a petition her supporters had presented to the mayor seeking the removal of a city manager. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
It presents the question whether, in prosecuting a woman accused of smuggling drugs into the United States, the government can introduce expert testimony that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not typically entrust large quantities of drugs to unwitting transporters. United States.
After a dispute over the trademarks for remote controls used to operate heavy construction equipment, a jury awarded Oklahoma-based Hetronic International, Inc. Claiming rights to water from the Colorado River itself, the Navajo Nation sued the federal government. Hetronic International, Inc. trademarks.
Oklahoma , a confrontation clause question involving statements about possible future crimes, and a split over the scope of who is covered by the qualified immunity doctrine. Oklahoma that the eastern half of Oklahoma (nearly 43% of the state) qualifies as “Indian country” for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act.
The DOJ also said that the law regulates areas that are preempted by federal government authority because of the impact this ban will have on interstate commerce. One clinic in Oklahoma said “the numbers of calls it received from Texans increased from approximately three to five calls per day to between fifty and fifty-five.”
Oklahoma last term, the court confronted the complex past of Oklahoma’s Native nations, Chehalis turns on the unique legal history of Alaskan Natives. Though Alaska became part of the United States in 1867, the federal government only fitfully devoted attention to the status of the new territory’s Indigenous peoples.
The facts Hetronic, based in Oklahoma, manufactures and sells radio remote controls that operate heavy-duty construction equipment. A jury in Oklahoma City awarded Hetronic more than $90 million. Therefore, a party claiming that a federal statute applies extraterritorially can have essentially two bites at the apple.
Until 2020, the industry was governed primarily by the states, which employed a patchwork of varying regulations. No longer the only horseracing regulators in town, a group of states, led by Oklahoma, and their racing commissions went to federal court in Kentucky. Evaluating the newly amended law in Oklahoma’s appeal, the U.S.
Although almost all Native American tribes in the United States operate under a trust relationship with the federal government, those two tribes were in a trust relationship with Texas from 1968 to 1987. Although Gorsuch describes the case as clinched, he goes further to emphasize two other statutes contemporaneous with the Restoration Act.
The court reasoned that since SB 14 does not violate a constitutionally protected interest, it can be found unconstitutional only if it is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest. The post Texas Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors appeared first on JURIST - News.
The state of Oklahoma put James Coddington to death on Aug. It marks the beginning of a busy period at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary’s execution chamber. Photo courtesy Oklahoma Dept. Today, fewer jurisdictions are using the death penalty, but some – like Oklahoma – seem to be doubling down. James Coddingon.
Below is my column in the Wall Street Journal on the ongoing opioid litigation and an important ruling out of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. ” The Oklahoma Supreme Court last week struck down a $465 million opioid award against Johnson & Johnson based on a legal theory that has previously been tried and failed against guns.
At issue in Oklahoma v. Judge Julius Richardson concurred in the judgment, asking the Supreme Court to clarify the legal tests governing the inquiry. Brenda Evers Andrew was convicted in Oklahoma state court of conspiring with her boyfriend, James Pavatt, to murder her estranged husband, Robert Andrew. New Relists Oklahoma v.
Oklahoma cases as a single case — that I have to be extremely summary. Oklahoma that Congress had not clearly disestablished a Creek Nation reservation covering much of eastern Oklahoma, and thus the area remained Native American territory for the purposes of a federal criminal law, eliminating the state’s ability to prosecute crimes there.
Oklahoma ,” which is now being briefed for argument in the fall. Now before the Supreme Court a second time, Escobar argues first that his case “presents the same question as Glossip v. 26 and May 9 conferences; relisted after the May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) Jane Doe 1 v. Kentucky ex rel.
State governments are already responding to the Dobbs decision with new regulations banning abortion or working to reinforce protections for people seeking abortions in their states across state lines. HB314 reinforced Alabama statute banning abortion that was never appealed after it was made unenforceable under Roe. South Dakota.
The Oklahoma charter school board that approved the Catholic schools application tells the justices that a state supreme court ruling invalidating its contract with the school violates the Constitution and harms lower-income families. The state supreme court granted that request. It concluded that St. It concluded that St.
The states also allege that suits involving the interstate effects of pollution are exclusively governed by federal common law and belong in federal court to avoid the risk of inconsistent judgments. Relisted after the Dec. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Apache Stronghold v. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.)
This minimal test requires government action to have a legitimate purpose and the law in question to be rationally related to that purpose. People from states with restrictive regimes, like Oklahoma , already are traveling to states that protect access. Hellerstedt. Some states, like California, pay for low-income patients’ care.
Yes, the statute really does have a full cite to the opinion in it. The 5th Circuit also affirmed a preliminary injunction forbidding the government from enforcing the vaccination requirement against any federal employee nationwide. Nelson ,…517 U.S. The California state law at issue in Flagstar Bank v. Two days earlier, the U.S.
The Republican-led “anti-ESG” (environmental, social, governance) movement over the last two years has largely been a legislative effort, comprised primarily of state-level bills that attempt to halt the consideration of climate risk and other commonplace factors in investment decisions connected with government funds, contracts, and pensions.
Yellen addresses the Constitution’s allocation of taxing authority between the federal and state governments. McCall , a tire manufacturer resists Georgia courts’ exercise of jurisdiction on the basis of its compliance with Georgia’s registration statute for foreign corporations. New York v. In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v.
Louisiana filed suit in the US District Court for its Western District, leading a cohort comprising Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.
Until 2020, the horse-racing industry was governed primarily by the states, resulting in a patchwork of differing regulations. That is the same framework, the authority noted, that has governed the relationship between the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for 85 years.
Together, these cases deal with balancing government authority, economic activity, and individual rights. Her statement that pleas of administrative inconvenience never justify departing from the statutes clear text signals a shift away from deferring to agencies when they claim procedural efficiency or practical necessity.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take an appeal by anti-abortion activists in a First Amendment dispute with Planned Parenthood, as well as a test of New Jersey’s “slogan statutes.” A jury awarded Planned Parenthood nearly $2.5 million, but the group contended that its conduct was protected by the First Amendment.
Finally, there is a lengthy list of particular models that fall within the scope of the statute, notably all “AK” weapons (modeled after the Russian AK-47) and all “AR” weapons (those modeled after the AR-15). The government denies that there’s any such split. 22 caliber rimfire ammunition). We’ll know more soon. Until next time!
If the justices decide to take up any of these cases, the government will presumably be represented in its briefs and at oral argument at the Supreme Court by Trumps pick for solicitor general, John Sauer. Student-loan forgiveness Another 5th Circuit ruling led to the governments petition in Department of Education v. Oklahoma v.
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit erred in concluding that the Eighth and Fifth Amendments permit the government to execute the petitioner, Wesley Coonce ? City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma v. Issues : (1) Whether, because the age at which a capital defendant became intellectually disabled does not bear on his moral culpability, the U.S.
The justices invited Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher to file briefs expressing the federal government’s views in three cases. Intratek Computer , the government will weigh in on the effect of a federal whistleblower statute on an arbitration agreement between an employer and its employee. In Robertson v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content