Remove Government Remove Pennsylvania Remove Stare Decisis
article thumbnail

Word of the Month for August 2019: Stare Decisis

Legal Research is Easy

The 1st Amendment reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Schempp , 374 U.S. Schempp , 374 U.S.

article thumbnail

Conflict of Laws and Diversity of Opinions—A View of The Nigerian Jurisdiction

Conflict of Laws

LLC, Raiders , a Pennsylvania company insured a yacht for up to $550,000 with Great Lakes, a UK-based company. [12] It has anchorage on doctrines such as stare decisis and precedents. Stare decisis and precedents ensure that the law remains strong, stable, reliable, and predictable without standing still.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Back to the Bullpen: Minor League Teams Settle with MLB Over Latest Challenge to Baseball’s Historic Antitrust Exemption

Fordham Law News

9] In fact, many sports leagues benefit from this exemption when it comes to the rules that govern their relationship with the players. [10] 13] The Court defended the exemption largely on the grounds of stare decisis and congressional acquiescence, tasking Congress with changing the long-standing law if they felt the need. [14]

Sports 52
article thumbnail

Animal rights and the First Amendment, due process and a confession of error

SCOTUSBlog

Although the railroad’s principal place of business is Virginia, it is registered to do business in Pennsylvania as a foreign corporation, and Mallory sued there. However, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that state’s consent-by-registration statute to be unconstitutional under the due process clause.

Statute 101
article thumbnail

We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to

SCOTUSBlog

Against stare decisis. Many amici focus on the principle of stare decisis – and urge the court not to follow it in this case. Americans United for Life argues that “ Roe and Casey contradict the stare decisis values of consistency, dependability, and predictability and are entitled to minimal stare decisis respect.”