This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court issued a temporary nationwide stay Thursday that revived the Corporate Transparency Act , which regulates money laundering by requiring smallbusinesses to register with the United States Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
In a unanimous slip opinion, the US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) waives sovereign immunity and that the federal government can be liable for incorrect debt reporting that damages credit scores. The federal government plays a central role in the distribution and use of this data.
Second, courts will read federal statutes to abrogate that immunity only when they speak to the point “unequivocal[ly].” The Band’s argument is simple: the statute never mentions Indian tribes. Because it doesn’t mention Indian tribes, the Band contends that the statute does not unequivocally extend to them.
About 50 agents in a SmallBusiness Administration office are sorting through two million potentially fraudulent loan applications. The federal government has already charged 1,500 people with defrauding pandemic-aid programs, and more than 450 people have been convicted so far.
government has failed to show how the Corporate Transparency Act meets narrow exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's search warrant requirements, a group of smallbusinesses told a Michigan federal court Friday in contending that the statute is unconstitutional.
In Chapter 7 filings, the CARES Act also amended the definition of “income” to exclude coronavirus-related payments from the federal government. As originally enacted, a business’s debts must be less than $2,725,625 in order to be eligible to file a case under Subchapter V. This debt limit was increased to $7.5
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), enacted on March 27, 2020, created the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”), the now-familiar forgivable loan program administered by the SmallBusiness Administration (“SBA”).
government. Miller met with senior officials from the Government of Mexico and the railway industry in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico Friday to discuss action to address enhanced border security operations in response to increased encounters. Highlights: CBP identified nearly $7.1 billion of duties to be collected by the U.S.
Reasonable minds can quibble over that number – some say it is exaggerated – but no one doubts or disputes that the legal system falls dramatically short of serving those who need it, not just for those with low incomes, but also for the middle class and smallbusinesses. The other is the continuing lack of public access to the law.
Princess argued that Mr Ho’s contract was subject to different terms and conditions to those that governed the contracts of other Aussie passengers. The decision is significant too for private international law nerds like myself, contemplating how to resolve choice of law questions in our age of statutes.
Luis Sanchez is a part-owner of a smallbusiness in Florida selling electronics to Latin American customers. As payment for some computer accessories that she had already purchased, Jaqueline Palacios, who owns a small computer company in Bolivia, sent Sanchez $9,000 in cash with a courier to the United States.
Federal Laws Governing Data Privacy. Currently, the legal framework for data privacy consists of a patchwork of state and federal laws and regulations and industry standards that govern the collection, use, and disclosure of private information.
From videos to written content to audios, AI is a massive help in these areas, especially for smallbusinesses. These applications of AI in marketing have revolutionized the way businesses connect with customers and drive growth. AI and machine learning: a simple explanation What is artificial intelligence?
The best place to begin any analysis is probably with the statute. The key trademark statute followed by the USPTO is the 1946 Lanham Act. Boundy also alleges the USPTO evaded the Regulatory Flexibility Act’s mandate to analyze impacts of rules on smallbusinesses. ” 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(2).
Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. The court’s ruling could have ripple effects across the federal government, where agencies frequently use highly trained experts to interpret and implement federal laws.
11] Proponents argue that by eliminating banks and custodians, DeFi reduces transaction costs, increases transparency, expands access to those who may otherwise be unable to borrow, and allows those holding cryptocurrencies to earn interest by investing in decentralized lending funds governed and secured by smart contracts. [12]. 23, 2021).
The mission’s cert petition — which was supported by a whopping 17 amicus briefs — contends it is entitled to hire only individuals who share its religious views; it also argues that the Washington anti-discrimination law should be subject to strict scrutiny because it completely exempts smallbusinesses with seven or fewer employees.
Court Challenges In a significant victory, our firm successfully challenged the United States Department of Commerce’s final scope ruling on composite tile, leading to a remand by the United States Court of International Trade. The DOC scope ruling was found to be unsupported by substantial evidence and not in accordance with the law.
They’ve also stopped enforcing the laws against storming government buildings, but I dont think the firm is advising clients to take a dump in Nancy Pelosis office. Especially considering the statute of limitations will survive into the next administration. For a collection of lawyers, it’s embarrassing.
Both of these acts authorize the executive branch of the federal government–the US president and the Treasury Department–”to investigate and if necessary mitigate national security risks arising from foreign economic actors.”
Not to be deterred, the administration reportedly is pushing forward with a possible extension of that rule to smallbusinesses. That is when Klain again confidently rushed in where wiser government lawyers fear to tread. Biden eventually acknowledged that he does not have the authority to order a national mandate directly.
More than 500 law firms and 300 retired judges asked for leave to file two amicus briefs condemning Trumps order stripping security clearances from and severing government ties with the major law firm, which previously did work for Democrats. Read more here. A group of 363 law professors also filed a brief – see here. #9
The government defended the policy by citing concerns about military readiness, unit cohesion, and costs, but the court found these justifications unsupported by credible evidence. Obama) What its about: This case arose from the federal governments termination of thousands of probationary employees across multiple agencies in February 2025.
Politico’s Josh Gerstein flagged the complaint , which was filed in the Middle District of Florida on behalf of a smallbusiness that sells “premium planners, organizational tools, and home management products.” As Ley points out, IEEPA isn’t a tariff statute at all.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content