Remove Government Remove Statute Remove Tort
article thumbnail

A Novel Expansion Of Alien Tort Statute In 9th Circ.

Law 360

Cisco rehearing denial allows a new invocation of the Alien Tort Statute to proceed, which could capture the U.S. companies doing business with foreign governments, say attorneys at Ropes & Gray. The Ninth Circuit's Doe v. Supreme Court's attention, and has potentially dramatic consequences for U.S.

Tort 52
article thumbnail

New Report on Liability Considerations for Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal in the U.S.

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

These statutes could impose liability on mCDR project proponents who violate the laws by failing to comply with the relevant statutory requirements. Such violations could result in both civil and criminal penalties, with some statutes imposing fines for each day a violation continues. judge-made) law. judge-made) law.

Tort 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices scuttle lawsuit against Nestlé, Cargill for allegedly aiding child slavery abroad

SCOTUSBlog

The plaintiffs relied on the Alien Tort Statute, an 18th-century law that permits foreigners to bring lawsuits in U.S. courts to apply the Alien Tort Statute outside the United States, where U.S. courts for serious violations of international law. laws normally do not apply. That is a good thing,” Gorsuch reasoned.

Tort 138
article thumbnail

Pakistan dispatch: monsoons prompt concerns about official negligence aggravating environmental devastation

JURIST

There is no parliamentary statute, like the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 in the UK and Federal Torts Claims Act 1946 in the USA, that provides citizens the right to pursue tortious remedies against the government, nor is there any clear precedent set by the superior courts of the country that establishes the same.

Tort 197
article thumbnail

Tennessee statute of limitations is based on gravamen of complaint.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff’s claims against defendant county were based on intentional torts, a one-year statute of limitations applied. Plaintiff’s initial complaint listed several intentional torts, but his amended complaint removed the referral to any specific torts and instead alleged liability more generally. In Anderson v.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

No exception to products liability statute of repose for latent disease or fraudulent concealment.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff filed a products liability claim based on a hip replacement device she had received, but her hip replacement occurred more than ten years before her suit was filed, dismissal based on the statute of repose was affirmed. The statute of repose for products liability cases is a hard line with very limited exceptions.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Summary judgment based on GTLA and Recreational Use Statute affirmed.

Day on Torts

Where defendant governmental entity did not own the park where plaintiff was injured, and plaintiff was attending a concert in the park when she fell, summary judgment based on both the GTLA and Recreational Use Statute was affirmed. The Court next turned to whether summary judgment was appropriate under the Recreational Use Statutes.

Statute 59