This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Amnesty International’s investigation focused on four Israeli attacks in Beirut between October 3 and 9, 2024, which killed 19 healthcare workers, wounded 11 more, and destroyed multiple ambulances and two medical facilities. It serves as the primary healthcare provider in areas that Israel repeatedly attacked.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) called on the new Lebanese government to adopt a human rights oriented agenda that promotes the rule of law, transparency and accountability on Thursday. The organization urged the government to implement legal reforms across various sectors to meet the needs of the people and build a brighter future for the country.
Karim AA Khan stated that his office collected solid evidence suggesting that the Supreme Leader of the Taliban and the Chief Justice of the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan” committed the crime of persecution on gender grounds, violating Article 7 (1) (h) of the Rome Statute.
The Fact-Finding Mission called for an immediate ceasefire between both parties under respect for International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Under the Rome Statute , these crimes are considered the most serious crimes of concern to the international community that warrant the adjudication of an international court.
Over an 85-day offensive, the report says the forced systematically attacked “objects indispensable to survival” (OIS) of civilians, including energy, water, food distribution points, and healthcare facilities. These attacks severely restricted access to fundamental civilian infrastructure and humanitarian aid.
The backbone of all good personal injury law firms is its paralegals. Paralegals are essential to a personal injury law firm, whether for a solo practitioner or a large firm with many lawyers. A valuable personal injury paralegal is a paralegal who knows not only the law but also the medicine. initial intake).
Kirschenbaum — In a recent decision, the Second Circuit upheld the HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG)’s position that Pfizer’s proposed copay assistance program for its high-cost heart treatment would violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). The Second Circuit’s Interpretation of the Anti-Kickback Statute. Pfizer, Inc.
after the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) said that Pfizer’s plan to cover patients’ copays for its heart failure medications violated US law. The post US Appeals Court rules Pfizer plan to cover heart medication copays violates US law appeared first on JURIST - News.
Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. Facts of the Case Petitioner David Dubin was convicted of healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. The crux of the healthcare fraud was a misrepresentation about the qualifications of petitioner’s employee,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote. 1028A(a)(1).
Law students and young lawyers in Ukraine are filing for JURIST on the latest developments in that country as it defends itself against Russian invasion. During the first five days of combat, Russian forces attacked dozens of civilian targets, which do not qualify as legitimate military targets under international law.
Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v.
This decision clarifies what damages are available to individuals who sue under federal anti-discrimination statutes. Cummings then filed a lawsuit against Premier for discrimination on the basis of her disability, alleging that the company violated federal anti-discrimination laws when refusing to provide her with an interpreter.
In a statement , the company denied all allegations raised in the case, saying that it believed its intent and conduct to be at all times lawful and appropriate. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have aggressively pursued antikickback cases in the healthcare industry. See 42 U.S.C.
Defendant argued that plaintiff’s claim could not stand because it was “premised solely on vicarious liability, but the underlying claims against the alleged agents were barred by the statute of limitations at the time suit was filed against [defendant].” Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals , 325 S.W.3d In Gardner v. 3d 98 (Tenn.
The technological characteristics in this context may cover a wide range of device functions, for instance, monitoring features, stimulation parameters, and communications with healthcare providers. Please refer to the help text in this section for the content that is required according to this statute.” Special 510(k)s.
The hospitals argued that the profits helped them offset the considerable costs of providing healthcare to the uninsured and underinsured in low-income and rural communities, something that Congress was well aware of and intended when it passed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act in 2003. Becerra, No.
They ask the court to clarify prior case law on bar-association dues and declare that the Oregon policy is subject to the same “exacting” First Amendment scrutiny as laws involving subsidized speech by public-sector unions. Lastly, Healthcare Distribution Alliance v. Oregon State Bar.
By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. Code Ann. § 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).
However, there is one notable addition to the subscription site — a comprehensive collection of primary source content covering all federal and state statutes and regulations. Until now, the platform included primary source law only to the extent it related to the practice areas WK covers.
Gaulkin — We previously blogged about Pfizer’s copay assistance lawsuit, which sought to challenge HHS’s interpretation of the Federal health care program anti-kickback statute (AKS) and position that the company’s proposed copay assistance program would violate the AKS. By Sophia R. Background. 3d 774 (7th Cir. Greber, 760 F.2d
Supreme Court recently agreed to consider a case that is expected to define the scope of federal identity theft law. He was subsequently charged with healthcare fraud, as well as aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. A jury found Dubin guilty of one charge of healthcare fraud and aggravated identity theft. Facts of the Case.
Interpreting federal statutes, regulations, and an administrative manual, the court adopts “[a] narrower definition of unallowable advertising,” one that makes a “distinction between advertising that educates potential beneficiaries about needed care and advertising designed to generate revenue.”
Brevig, Senior Regulatory Device and Biologics Expert — Earlier this year, we posted on the still unsettled state of the law regarding whether “FDCA violations may, in certain circumstances, be material to the government’s decision whether to pay for the affected product, and thus relevant in an FCA case.” By JP Ellison & Holly N.
Both serve to depict healthcare that is provided virtually and without physical contact with a healthcare provider. A patient explains his or her complaints virtually, often by video conferencing, and the healthcare provider will give a recommendation or diagnosis. Potential for fraud and abuse. Privacy and confidentiality.
In three of the past four terms, the Supreme Court has rejected broad readings of white-collar criminal laws urged by the federal government. Issue : Whether a federal court deciding a state-law issue in a bankruptcy case must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules or federal choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs.
Applications of AI in healthcare Artificial intelligence in the healthcare industry has numerous applications that can improve patient care, diagnoses, and overall efficiency in the industry. Fraud detection AI can be used to detect and prevent fraudulent activities in government programs such as social security, tax, and healthcare.
The FTC expressed concern that patent listings that do not meet the statutory criteria undermine the competitive process, may disincentivize investment in developing generic and follow-on products, and reduce patient access to more affordable drugs thereby increasing costs to the healthcare system.
Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. Sanho Corp.
However, there is one notable addition to the subscription site — a comprehensive collection of primary source content covering all federal and state statutes and regulations. Until now, the platform included primary source law only to the extent it related to the practice areas WK covers.
That changed on October 18, 2021 when the Federal District Court for the District of Hawaii handed down a decision that construed key terms in the statute. Note that EKRA’s reach is broader than the Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies only to “federal healthcare programs” — e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc. 18 U.S.C. §
This update complies with amendments to the Power of Attorney Statute that takes effect June 13, 2021. The distinctive boilerplate and usage in countless transactions have become the trusted choice of attorneys and the financial, real estate, business, and healthcare communities.
Governors, state cannabis regulators, law enforcement groups and local governments weighed in, as did marijuana advocates and opponents, marijuana industry associations, Members of Congress, federal law enforcement groups, healthcare and human rights groups, unions and trade associations, and private individuals. 21 U.S.C. §
It held that under pre-AIA Federal Circuit precedent, a patentee’s sale of a product made by a secret process placed the process “on sale” under the statute, thus invalidating later patent claims to the process. But, the problem is that the statute expressly asks whether the invention was “on sale.”
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Two groups of law professors have each filed an amicus brief in support of the petition. The patentee in the case argues that inherency is too strict a standard and that it goes beyond what is required by the statute and prior precedent. by Dennis Crouch. 21-1070; petition from 38 F.4th 4th 1013 (U.S.
Prohibition on Excessive Price Increases The law prohibits manufacturers from imposing or causing to be imposed an “excessive price increase,” whether directly or through a wholesale distributor, pharmacy, or similar intermediary, on the sale of any generic or off-patent drug sold or dispensed to any consumer in the state.
That changed on October 18, 2021 when the Federal District Court for the District of Hawaii handed down a decision that construed key terms in the statute. Note that EKRA’s reach is broader than the Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies only to “federal healthcare programs” — e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc. 18 U.S.C. §
The law attempts to reward whistleblowers and disincentivize committing fraud and can be used to expose customs fraud. The law attempts to reward whistleblowers and disincentivize committing fraud and can be used to expose customs fraud. What is the False Claims Act? Register here.
6) motion is the correct vehicle to challenge compliance with the requirement of pre-suit notice in a healthcare liability action.” The Court pointed out that the motion in Martin was a motion for summary judgment, which is why the Court therein cited Rule 56, but that the Martin opinion held that “a Rule 12.02(6) internal citation omitted).
Ultimately, it is usually a lawyer’s decision on when to retire—dependent if the law firm has a mandatory retirement policy. Some law firms have policies that require attorneys to retire by a certain age—usually between 65 and 70. law firms have a mandatory retirement policy in place. It is never too soon to begin planning.
The court granted review in two cases alleging that failures to adequately disclose hospital emergency room “Evaluation and Management Services” fees violated the state’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law. In an unpublished opinion , the Sixth District Court of Appeal in Capito v. In In re Ja.O. ,
There appears to be significant overlap in content between the Checklist and informed consent forms and processes routinely provided by healthcare providers to their patients. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law.” This proposal is a[n].
These victims have also been exposed to acute hunger and lack of healthcare services. Minister Aleisir in the statement classified RSF as a terrorist organization due to the committal of a series of crimes that conflict with humanitarian law, religious values, and international law. million people.
Separately, federal law also permits tribes to negotiate their contracts with the IHS to allow the tribe to bill its members’ insurance (whether private insurance, federal Medicare or Medicaid, workers’ compensation, or some other kind) for the services provided. And in 2023, a divided panel of the U.S. United States , Thomas v. 3 and Nov.
The Author Niharika Mukherjee is associated to the National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Bangalore. For this purpose, this article shall rely on model turnkey contracts drafted by Indian and international institutions, [3] apart from relevant case law and statutory provisions. Niharika Mukherjee. Introduction.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content