This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. The roster of speakers includes Dennis Crouch, John Duffy, David Hricik, and John White. 2.2. David Hricik (Mercer Law School): Academic Perspective on Patent Valuation 1: Recent Legal and Technological Changes Reducing Patent Value. We are expecting and pending for 14 hours of Utah CLE.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. The October 4, 2022 presidential decision awarding sanctions against OpenSky LLC and its counsel is here. There are several amici briefs that went into this order which is a doozy.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. This is not a patent case, but I have seen similar problems in prosecution, patent litigation, and related contexts over the years: an important email goes to a spam filter, or some other place, and gets left unread. In a recent Fifth Circuit case, Rollins v.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. As a follow up to an earlier post, today the Ohio Supreme Court in Revolaze LLC v. Dentons denied review of the decision affirming a jury verdict. It doesn’t say much, but it is here.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Over the decades (sigh) I’ve been involved in various capacities in cases where practitioners have missed deadlines. Sometimes, the client’s partly to blame.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Over the years (sigh, decades) of being involved with ethical issues in patent practice, one set of problems that recurs involves assignments from employee-inventors.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. In Plummer v. McSweene y, the plaintiff, Plummer, sued a law firm for legal malpractice. The firm moved to compel arbitration.
Hricik and I have both written about the Federal Circuit decision: David Hricik, “ The Many Mistakes in the Panel Decision in GS CleanTech Corp v. Adkins ”; David Hricik, “ Will the Court Correct the Mess that is GS CleanTech Corp. Now comes the petition for writ of certiorari.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Law firms are targets of hackers, and patent firms in particular are so. Because hackers know they have the “wheat” separated from the chaff, and hackers believe firms also have less robust security than their clients. Ass’n. Formal Eth. 483 ( here ).
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School I realize most readers aren’t law professors, so you can stop now… I have taught IP courses for years and often the books seek to teach the subject through cases, which is a very difficult way to learn it.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Dennis on the main page had written a couple months back about the opinion of Novartis Pharm. Accord Healthcare, Inc., 4th 1013 (Fed.
David Hricik. The Hricik Brief spells out the arguments as follows: This case presents an extraordinary circumstance in which, after a three-judge panel issued a 2-1 decision affirming the district court, a new panel was created for purposes of rehearing. Hricik Brief. Hricik Brief. FRAP 35(e). Claim at issue: 1.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. A partner at a major firm had been suspended initially for six months for intentionally over-billing certain clients for 450 hours of work she and other lawyers had not performed. Apparently, one justice initially decides the penalty in a bar proceeding there.).
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. The American Bar Association committee on professional ethics issues opinions on issues which, while not binding on any jurisdiction, often have sway over courts and bar associations in malpractice or disciplinary matters. If you follow their guidance, you, in a sense, start off in safe harbor.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. A long time ago, I posted here about the potential for conflict when fee shifting is in play and the opposing party is seeking an award of fees and asserts that the opposing party may be liable instead of, or in addition to, opposing counsel.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. In Avus Designs Inc. Grezxx LLC (D. 22-CV-00173-SWS Dec. 2, 2022), the district court analyzed whether it could properly enter default judgment against a Wyoming limited liability corporation, or “LLC.”
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Giving a talk in Austin and thought I’d share a couple of interesting results I’ll be speaking about later today. in most states prohibits, without consent of opposing counsel, communications about a matter with a person represented by counsel in that matter.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Noted below, Akin Gump had sued a former vendor, Xcential, arguing that its lawyers had invented what Xcential had sought to patent. In response to the firm’s suit, Xcential filed five counterclaims, essentially asserting Akin Gump had misused information that Xcential had disclosed to Akin Gump.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Judge Albright granted Google’s motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) from the Western District of Texas to the Northern District of California in an opinion in Motion Offense LLC v. Google, LLC ( here ).
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. I’m speaking at a conference in Palo Alto, and one long topic of conversation was about the disagreement between how Judge Albright views Fifth Circuit precedent on mandamus to review discretionary transfers under Section 1404 and the Federal Circuit views that same precedent.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. In Haynes Holding Group LLC v. ESR Performance Corp. et al (C.D. 8:21-cv-02033 JVS (JDEx) (I can’t find a free version of the opinion), after the patentee sued, the defendant served a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Over on Gene Quinn’s IPwatchdog page, former chief judge Rader has written an article about the Supreme Court’s 101 jurisprudence. I clerked for then chief-judge Rader in 2012-13 (I think I have been the clerk’s oldest clerk, then 51 years old).
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Ordinarily, under Model Rule 4.2 you cannot communicate with a person represented by counsel in a matter without opposing counsel’s consent — even if opposing counsel is present (the rule is not limited to “ex parte” communications).
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Background to this interesting case. When Congress is considering a bill that changes an existing statute, the bill does not show new language by underlining and deletions to existing text by strike throughs.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School As has been reported by Dennis on the main page, by Gene Quinn on IP Watchdog ( here ), and by various media I am seeing, Chief Judge Moore reportedly threatened Judge Newman with a petition to remove Judge Newman as incompetent to carry out her duties unless Judge Newman agreed to take senior status.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) requires that fraud or mistake be pled with particularity. See David Hricik, Wrong about Everything: The Application by the District Courts of Rule 9(b) to Inequitable Conduct, 86 Marquette Law Review 895 (2003) ( here ).) Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Ordinarily, a conflict of interest leads to disqualification, but they can lead to fee disgorgement (an attorney is supposed to be loyal, and like any other agent, is not entitled to keep a fee earned while being disloyal) and, on occasion, damages.
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School. There are a number of ethics opinions and a couple of cases discussing whether it is adverse to opine — infringement, design around, and invalidity — for a client about another’s patent. This case addresses the issue in the context of consent. In Kimberly-Clark Corp. Extrusion Grp.,
David Hricik wrote for this blog about how, in an earlier version of the Motion Offense order, Judge Albright claimed he’d have denied transfer under Fifth Circuit venue law but was compelled to grant transfer under Federal Circuit law. I hand counted the citations, so it’s possible I missed or misclassified a small number of them.
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In a single decision issued by several panels, the Board held that the patentee had failed to act in good faith by, boiled down, intentionally withholding material test data that was inconsistent with the arguments it was making in favor of patentability of both original and proposed substitute claims.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content