This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Six major book publishers Friday sued the Florida Department of Education, challenging a 2023 state law used to restrict books in school libraries. The plaintiffs are suing on the basis that the state law is overbroad and violates the freedom of expression protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
. * Reframing biodiversity discussions may play a key role in how litigants represent Nature. [ Ag-Gag law ruled unconstitutional. [ Seeing double: Idaho is about to pass their version of the Texas Roe work-around. appeared first on Above the Law. The Guardian ]. Can’t do that! Des Moines Register ]. Huffington Post ].
The plaintiffs allege that this provision violates the Virginia Readmission Act , a law passed in 1870 alongside a series of statutes to readmit representatives from former Confederate states to Congress. According to the complaint, only nine crimes were considered felonies under Virginia common law in 1870.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? We share what we found below. In addition, we just learned of a new NIJ study on the use of Chatbots in the Criminal Justice System to add to our list of online helpers.
There is an interesting defamation case out of Idaho in which Rebecca Scofield , an associate professor and the chair of the history department at the University of Idaho, is suing TikTok personality Ashley Guillard for defamation. That was the case with the litigation over the false claims made against former Rep.
And I am perhaps most interested in hearing about the experiences of those who have experienced IP litigation from the clients perspective, whether as the claim owner or accused infringer. Gastons practice focuses on intellectual property litigation and related counseling, with a strong focus on patent matters.
The lawsuit poses a challenge to a recent state law prohibiting transgender women from participating in women's athletics events sponsored by public schools, colleges, and universities.
The court’s decision could fundamentally restructure interstate groundwater law in the United States for decades — or the case could be dismissed immediately on the grounds that Mississippi has failed to allege the proper cause of action. In 1983, for example, it upheld the special master in Idaho ex rel.
3, the justices will hear oral argument in important cases involving issues such as voting rights, the Clean Water Act, and a challenge to a California animal-welfare law. During the argument session that begins on Oct. The justices will kick off the argument session with Sackett v. Pennsylvania (Oct. Milligan (Oct. Goertz (Oct.
* Bad Blood: Apple is facing antitrust litigation because of its heart monitoring capabilities. Idaho’s governor just yolo signed a bill that flouts Roe. [ No Cuomo: NY passed laws that will strengthen harassment and discrimination protections. National Law Review ]. National Law Review ]. Reuters ]. *
While the CWA defines the term “navigable waters” as “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas,” the precise scope of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) has been subject to frequent litigation. The post US Supreme Court to Revisit Clean Water Act appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Rapanos v.
Even if the decision stands, it applies only in the Ninth Circuit, which encompasses Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Energy Policy & Conservation Act appeared first on Climate Law Blog. Clean Air Act, not EPCA. Berkeley decision.)
The FCC has already issued such an extension three times since the initial compliance deadline of May 26, 2015, as the NAB contends that there still is no workable technology that can perform the functions required by the rule (see our Broadcast Law Blog article here from the last extension 5 years ago).
The covenant included both in court litigation and also validity challenges before the USPTO. law relating to patent infringement or invalidity, and filed within two (2) years of the end of the Covenant Term, shall be filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Idaho Potato Comm’n v.
Transmission lines are, like generation facilities, often held up by litigation. However, as explained below, siting decisions for pipelines and transmission lines are governed by different laws, and while both are subject to environmental review, their environmental impacts are not comparable. The following day the U.S.
“Appeals court lifts partial block on Idaho abortion ban; Enforcement of the law can begin as litigation winds its way through the courts”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report on an order that Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke issued today on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S.
The justices granted a petition filed by Axon Enterprise , which makes body cameras for law enforcement. The justices also agreed to hear the case of an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett , for the second time. One involves the power of federal district courts; the other tests the scope of the Clean Water Act.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for Idaho to temporarily enforce a state law criminalizing gender-transition care for minors against anyone who is not part of a lawsuit currently challenging that ban. The state enacted the law at the center of the dispute last year. Before the law could go into effect, U.S.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday declined to block access to emergency abortion services in Idaho. US , the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a federal law —the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)—would preempt Idaho’s near-total abortion ban. In Moyle v.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reinstated an Iowa law on Friday that law requires public school libraries to remove books that are not “age appropriate,” such as when they describe or depict “sex acts.” ” The law, SF 496 , also forbids education about gender identity.
Bloomberg News has reported that the Supreme Court briefly accidentally posted an opinion on its website that would allow emergency abortions to go forward in Idaho. United States and Idaho v. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowed that order to stay in place while litigation continued.
In September 2017, Adree Edmo , an incarcerated transgender woman, sued the Idaho Department of Corrections for refusing to provide her with medically necessary transition surgery, saying the refusal violated the Eighth Amendment. Courtesy Idaho Press. Barry , of the Quinnipiac University School of Law. Adree Edmo.
1] In 2021, Texas enacted Senate Bill 13, a law that prohibits the state from doing business with financial institutions that the state deems are boycotting energy companies. [2] 2] The law tasks the Texas Comptroller with keeping track of such financial companies. [3] “[I]f you boycott Texas energy, then Texas will boycott you.” [1]
The exchange occurred as Taub was being questioned on the meaning of “sectarian” under the law. Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation.
The US District Court for the District of Idaho on Thursday granted a preliminary injunction to block the enforcement of Idaho’s near-total ban against Idaho ER doctors from performing emergency abortions. The Idaho Capital Sun previously reported , “St. ” St.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Southern Environmental Law Center v. and non-U.S. Marten , No.
Accusations of her being a DEI judge and a rattled law professor have flooded social media, with figures like Mike Davis and Laura Loomer leading the charge. These cases share common themes, in resolving disputes over regulatory and administrative law, economic regulation, state-federal authority conflicts, and taxation. In Becerra v.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for emergency abortions to go forward, at least for now, in Idaho. United States and Idaho v. That 1986 law requires emergency rooms in hospitals that receive Medicare to provide “necessary stabilizing treatment” to patients who arrive with an “emergency medical condition.”
Last year, Tennessee and Kentucky were among a group of more than 20 states that enacted laws that prohibit giving transgender youths under the age of 18 medical treatment to align their appearance with their gender identity. Federal district courts in both states granted the challengers’ requests to block the laws from going into effect.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. and non-U.S. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 103. 3:17 -cv-00123 (W.D.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The defendants argued that the Second Circuit’s decision confirmed that the plaintiff’s claims necessarily arise under federal law.
Yet, what was most notable was this paragraph in the filing on the motives and means used by Castro: “Plaintiff John Anthony Castro filed this lawsuit as part of a multi-state litigation effort that he dubs “Operation Deadlock.” John Anthony Castro (@realJohnACastro), X (Sept. 20, 2023, 2:17 PM), [link].
The law applies to final agency rules but not other presidential or administrative actions, such as executive orders, proposed rules, or guidance documents. The Congressional Review Act The CRA allows Congress to review, and block implementation of, certain rules issued by executive agencies.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor cautioned that the majority’s decision would sweep expansively, so that “[i]n every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.” The law makes it a crime to “otherwise obstruct, influence, or impede, any official proceeding.” 6 defendants – including Trump – were charged. In Alexander v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content