Remove Idaho Remove Legal Remove Technology Assisted Review
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The mining company argued that the district court should not have issued the injunction without hearing legal arguments and factual evidence on the appropriate remedy, and without weighing the mandatory factors for a mandatory injunction. Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. Attorney General of Vermont , No. 349-6-16WNCV (Vt.

Court 40
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The plaintiffs alleged that the pipeline project would almost double the pipeline’s capacity and that the project would facilitate increased extraction and use of Canadian tar sands oil, resulting in “significant damage, estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars, due to its contribution climate change.” Idaho, filed Dec.

Court 52