This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for Idaho to temporarily enforce a state law criminalizing gender-transition care for minors against anyone who is not part of a lawsuit currently challenging that ban. Lynn Winmill temporarily blocked the state from enforcing any part of the law against anyone while the litigation continued.
Across the US, litigation has commenced against sexual content bans in Iowa , Texas , and Arkansas with varying outcomes. In recent months, Alabama and Idaho legislatures have passed similar legislation that restricts books based on sexual content, with challenges from civil rights groups expected.
Reframing biodiversity discussions may play a key role in how litigants represent Nature. [ Seeing double: Idaho is about to pass their version of the Texas Roe work-around. In other news, I clearly know about the sports ball. [ The Guardian ]. Can’t do that! Ag-Gag law ruled unconstitutional. [ Des Moines Register ].
The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. Forest Service erred by letting a Canadian gold company begin exploratory drilling in a national forest west of Yellowstone.
The lawsuit was first filed by members of the Christian Legal Society, who allegedly told pro-LGBTQ demonstrators at the University of Idaho that they would be condemned to hell.
Recently, litigation has been brought against an Idaho law that banned student ID cards as an adequate form of voter identification. The suit was filed at a time when stakeholders across the nation share similar concerns over voting rights.
Body camera footage shows an Idaho Springs officer tasing 75-year-old Michael Clark, who was--at the time--standing half-naked in his doorway, unmoving, and clearly unarmed.
There is an interesting defamation case out of Idaho in which Rebecca Scofield , an associate professor and the chair of the history department at the University of Idaho, is suing TikTok personality Ashley Guillard for defamation. That was the case with the litigation over the false claims made against former Rep.
And I am perhaps most interested in hearing about the experiences of those who have experienced IP litigation from the clients perspective, whether as the claim owner or accused infringer. Gastons practice focuses on intellectual property litigation and related counseling, with a strong focus on patent matters.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? We share what we found below. In addition, we just learned of a new NIJ study on the use of Chatbots in the Criminal Justice System to add to our list of online helpers.
The lawsuit poses a challenge to a recent state law prohibiting transgender women from participating in women's athletics events sponsored by public schools, colleges, and universities.
In 1983, for example, it upheld the special master in Idaho ex rel. Oregon in using equitable apportionment law to decide a dispute among Idaho, Oregon, and Washington over salmon in the Columbia River/Snake River system. At the same time, however, the Idaho v. However, the logic of that case cuts both ways for Mississippi v.
Environmental Protection Agency , the justices will once again weigh in on an Idaho couple’s efforts to build on land that they own – specifically, what test courts should use to determine whether the Clean Water Act applies to the land, which the EPA has deemed a wetland. Canada border in the Idaho panhandle. In Sackett v.
This week the Sacketts of Idaho were handed their most recent litigation defeat by a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In ruling against the Sacketts the panel held that.
The justices did not waste any time in getting down to business, hearing argument in a long-running dispute over an Idaho couple’s efforts to build a home on land that they own – but which the Environmental Protection Agency has deemed a “wetland.” Canada border in the Idaho panhandle.
But a review of the item’s ingredient-disclosure list reveals that the green tea and echinacea were “inactive” ingredients; “a tacit acknowledgment that they have no connection to the Product’s function.” ” ( Complaint , paragraph 43) Some may find that hard to swallow. # # # SOURCE SINGO v. .”
This Litigation Was Pretty Juicy. The plaintiff, who lived in Illinois, sought to pursue claims on behalf of herself and a class of other Illinois-based purchasers, together with those consumers who lived in Arkansas, Iowa, Wyoming, Texas, Nebraska, South Dakota, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Nebraska and Montana. In Cristia v.
Whether your complex case is in the area of bankruptcy, intellectual property, antitrust, construction defect, class action, international trade, business litigation or any other area of complex litigation — there are key tools that can set your case up for success.
* Bad Blood: Apple is facing antitrust litigation because of its heart monitoring capabilities. Idaho’s governor just yolo signed a bill that flouts Roe. [ All hands on deck: students are putting books on hold to support Ukraine. Reuters ]. * No Cuomo: NY passed laws that will strengthen harassment and discrimination protections.
While the CWA defines the term “navigable waters” as “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas,” the precise scope of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) has been subject to frequent litigation. In Rapanos v. United States , 547 U.S. 715 (2006), the Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands.
The FCC Administrative Law Judge, who is overseeing the hearing ordered by the Media Bureau on certain alleged factual issues that the Bureau has identified with the proposed acquisition, recently put the proceeding on hold so that the parties do not need to spend more money litigating if the deal will not happen.
Even if the decision stands, it applies only in the Ninth Circuit, which encompasses Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Berkeley has not yet said whether it will appeal the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
Transmission lines are, like generation facilities, often held up by litigation. The NWP 12 litigation has thus impeded two major pipelines: Keystone XL and Atlantic Coast. While transmission lines have faced their own litigation, legal challenges arise out of different types of issues. The following day the U.S.
The covenant included both in court litigation and also validity challenges before the USPTO. Idaho Potato Comm’n v. As part of a potential cooperative agreement, the parties mutually agreed to a temporary covenant-not-to-sue on IP issues related to Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy research and technology. 3d 130 (2d Cir.
10] For example, Idaho and Minnesota protect the mining, agriculture, lumber, and timber industries in their proposed bills. [11]. 11] Heath Cheek & Mason Jones, Why Companies Should Watch Anti-ESG Litigation , Bloomberg L. Eighteen states have adopted or proposed anti-ESG legislation or regulations in the past year. [7]
“Appeals court lifts partial block on Idaho abortion ban; Enforcement of the law can begin as litigation winds its way through the courts”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report on an order that Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke issued today on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency , the case of an Idaho couple who have been prohibited from building a home on land they own near Priest Lake, Idaho, because their lot contained wetlands that qualify as “navigable waters” regulated by the Clean Water Act. During the argument session that begins on Oct. Goertz (Oct.
The justices also agreed to hear the case of an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett , for the second time. In 2012, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the Sacketts could immediately litigate their challenge to the EPA’s order in federal court.
Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation. That is why Taub’s answer is so interesting in light of the state and federal litigation. 20-1088.
Bloomberg News has reported that the Supreme Court briefly accidentally posted an opinion on its website that would allow emergency abortions to go forward in Idaho. United States and Idaho v. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowed that order to stay in place while litigation continued.
” Hot-button Iowa legislation has faced litigation in recent months. And in previous years, litigation ensued over the state’s limits on damages for victims of police brutality and mask-mandate bans. And Alabama and Idaho are considering similar bills, potentially giving rise to more litigation in the future.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday declined to block access to emergency abortion services in Idaho. US , the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a federal law —the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)—would preempt Idaho’s near-total abortion ban. In Moyle v.
In September 2017, Adree Edmo , an incarcerated transgender woman, sued the Idaho Department of Corrections for refusing to provide her with medically necessary transition surgery, saying the refusal violated the Eighth Amendment. Courtesy Idaho Press. I’m extremely grateful that I finally received the treatment.”
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. In re Public Service Company of New Mexico , No.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for emergency abortions to go forward, at least for now, in Idaho. United States and Idaho v. A federal judge in Idaho agreed with the Biden administration and temporarily barred Idaho from enforcing its ban to the extent that it conflicts with EMTALA.
Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett are challenging a compliance order they received from the EPA after the purchase of a small parcel of land in Idaho that interfered with what at the time was classified as protectable waters. This revision to the CWA may affect the outcome of a case currently before the US Supreme Court.
Yet, what was most notable was this paragraph in the filing on the motives and means used by Castro: “Plaintiff John Anthony Castro filed this lawsuit as part of a multi-state litigation effort that he dubs “Operation Deadlock.” John Anthony Castro (@realJohnACastro), X (Sept. 20, 2023, 2:17 PM), [link].
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes filed a lawsuit in federal court in Idaho challenging the U.S. Idaho, filed Dec. and non-U.S.
The US District Court for the District of Idaho on Thursday granted a preliminary injunction to block the enforcement of Idaho’s near-total ban against Idaho ER doctors from performing emergency abortions. The Idaho Capital Sun previously reported , “St.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content