Immigration Laws Procedural Law 
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 17, 2020
Written by Orji Agwu Uka, Senior Associate at Africa Law Practice (ALP)*. This is the fifth and final online symposium on Private International Law in Nigeria initially announced on this blog. Those pieces of advice and legal representations would have benefitted greatly from a comprehensive private international law treatise.
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 21, 2023
On February 23 rd and 24 th , 2023, young scholars came together at the Siegmund Freud University, Vienna, to discuss different views on private international law under the theme of “Deference to the foreign – empty phrase or guiding principle of private international law?”.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
JANUARY 30, 2025
Regulations in force and in the making, to those establishing the scope of the applicable law identified by these Regulations, and to those concerning the circulation (of points) of decisions on preliminary questions. Lights and Shadows: Is Private International Law a Tool for Combating the Exploitation of Poverty or Legitimising Injustice?;
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 4, 2024
In the editors’ words, the book aims “ to shed light on the often overlooked legal difficulties at the interface between international family law and migration law ” (p. Given its scope and focus, the book will be of interest to researchers, scholars, and practitioners of Private International Law, Family Law, and Migration Law.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 19, 2022
Share Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly expel migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. The federal law at the center of the case is known as Title 42 of the Public Health Services Act. immigration court. And on Nov.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 4, 2025
A group of immigration advocacy groups initiated a lawsuit Monday against the Trump administration over their executive order barring migrants the right to make asylum claims at the US-Mexico border. Similarly, the plaintiffs argue that the order violates the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The Crime Report
AUGUST 16, 2021
Kacsmaryk said in his ruling on Friday that the Biden administration had violated procedural laws and failed to see “several of the main benefits” of the Remain in Mexico policy, also known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content