Remove Immigration Remove Legal Remove Missouri Remove Statute
article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

Louis, Missouri , 22-193 Issue : Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination as to all “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” or whether its reach is limited to discriminatory employer conduct that courts determine causes materially significant disadvantages for employees. New Relists Muldrow v.

article thumbnail

Justices Hear Oral Arguments in Four Cases

Constitutional Law Reporter

Missouri , involves a federal rule requiring all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they are eligible for a medical or religious exemption. The first, Biden v. 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief.”.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Myth Of The Modern Swing Vote

Above The Law

To answer this, I combined full-text analysis of opinions with voting data, legal metadata, and case structure. Supreme Court Database (such as cited constitutional amendments or statutory bases), I clustered decisions not just by linguistic similarity, but by legal substance.

article thumbnail

Montana asks justices to revive parental-consent law for minors to get an abortion

SCOTUSBlog

Children under 16 in Montana who seek an abortion, however, are required to notify their parents or legal guardian 48 hours before the procedure, unless they can obtain permission from a judge to bypass that requirement. In 2013, the Montana legislature tried to expand abortion restrictions for minors. 1101(a)(42). Jacobson v.

Laws 110
article thumbnail

Tough questions for both sides in dispute over “remain in Mexico” policy

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in the battle over the Biden administration’s efforts to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration policies. The law, she told the justices, “didn’t create the kind of mandate that” Texas and Missouri “are now reading into the statute.”.

article thumbnail

Federal appeals court strikes down Biden effort to end ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

JURIST

The MPP, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, requires asylum-seekers on the southern border to wait in Mexico, sometimes for years, while their asylum claims are processed in the US immigration system. Following the Biden administration’s decision to end MPP in early 2021, Texas and Missouri filed suit in federal court.

Court 197
article thumbnail

We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to

SCOTUSBlog

Trinity Legal Center and Catholic Medical Association, National Association of Catholic Nurses-USA, Idaho Chooses Life and Texas Alliance for Life make similar arguments. The Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for Constitutional Law , Concerned Women for America , and Judicial Watch, Inc. Against stare decisis.