Immigration Litigating North Carolina 
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 28, 2022
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. As we fast approach the Supreme Court hearings on race-conscious admissions at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, Asian Americans have been thrust into the spotlight. Our immigration stories are similarly diverse.
LawSites
DECEMBER 7, 2023
Clearbox builds solutions to simplify the US immigration process for DIY applicants. Courtroom5 , a platform that helps self-represented litigants navigate complex civil litigation matters, licensed their tech to NCCU Law for classroom use and is in development on a new platform slated for release in spring 2024.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Attorney at Work
AUGUST 27, 2021
Prior to joining LAWPRO, he was a policy lawyer at the Law Society of Ontario and practiced litigation with a focus on professional liability, public law and civil disputes. External collaborators may be clients, opposing counsel, co-counsel and service providers like marketing, virtual assistants or litigation support.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 26, 2022
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. No university has ever explained, in litigation or otherwise, why a diversity of students from these specific statistical categories are appropriate proxies for ethnic diversity. President & Fellows of Harvard College. A preview of the case is here.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 11, 2022
As they considered the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 12, the justices wondered aloud how the case would affect hypothetical state efforts to ban products from out-of-state companies that employ unauthorized immigrants, forbid labor unions, or refuse to fund certain types of health care.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 30, 2023
Singh (consolidated for one hour of oral argument), in which the justices will consider notice requirements in immigration cases; McElrath v. Garland and Garland v. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 18, 2022
The argument comes less than a month after the justices heard oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of Republican-led states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy after the Biden administration opted not to do so. The North Carolina legislature passed the voter-ID law at the center of the case in December 2018.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
99 
Let's personalize your content