Remove Immigration Remove Missouri Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink

SCOTUSBlog

(He might have had to answer some more difficult questions, though, since he was even then seeking to regularize his immigration status after entering the United States unlawfully.) Louis, Missouri , 20-391. The post Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink appeared first on SCOTUSblog. Garland , 20-979.

article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

Louis, Missouri , 22-193 Issue : Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination as to all “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” or whether its reach is limited to discriminatory employer conduct that courts determine causes materially significant disadvantages for employees. New Relists Muldrow v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices Hear Oral Arguments in Four Cases

Constitutional Law Reporter

Missouri , involves a federal rule requiring all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they are eligible for a medical or religious exemption. The first, Biden v. 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief.”.

article thumbnail

Justices delve into a trio of thorny issues in states’ challenge to federal immigration policy

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Under that rule, he asked, states would never have standing to challenge immigration enforcement?

article thumbnail

Court agrees to hear nine new cases, including challenge to tech companies’ immunity under Section 230

SCOTUSBlog

Two years ago, in a statement respecting the justices’ decision not to review a different case involving the scope of liability under Section 230, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that the court should consider “whether the text of this increasingly important statute aligns with the current state of immunity enjoyed by Internet platforms.”

Court 136
article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. In her cert petition, the U.S. Texas abortion law.

Laws 141
article thumbnail

Federal appeals court strikes down Biden effort to end ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

JURIST

The MPP, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, requires asylum-seekers on the southern border to wait in Mexico, sometimes for years, while their asylum claims are processed in the US immigration system. Following the Biden administration’s decision to end MPP in early 2021, Texas and Missouri filed suit in federal court.

Court 197