This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
immigration enforcement has largely shifted from the street to jails, resulting in overreach and an increase in incarceration, according to a NorthCarolina law professor. Jailhouse screening” was supposed to speed up immigration processes and identify undocumented immigrants who posed a threat to public safety.
Across America, law enforcement agencies have been accused of targeting Hispanic drivers, failing to collect data on those traffic stops, and covering up potential officer misconduct and aggressive immigration enforcement by identifying people as white on tickets, reports ProPublica. require the collection of data on traffic stops.
Migrants have disembarked in Georgia, NorthCarolina and Tennessee in recent weeks, and some of the buses arriving in New York and Washington have been nearly empty. For example, about 20 percent of migrants bused by Arizona have final destinations in Florida, according to a state report.
University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. As we fast approach the Supreme Court hearings on race-conscious admissions at Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina, Asian Americans have been thrust into the spotlight. Our immigration stories are similarly diverse.
They also are slated to hear a related challenge to race-conscious admissions at the University of NorthCarolina. Members of both parties used much of their time on Wednesday to pontificate on pet issues, from court-packing proposals to immigration policy to the role of “dark money” in judicial nominations and amicus briefs.
8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. Since 1986, bankruptcy cases in Alabama or NorthCarolina have been administered by trustees appointed by the judicial branch, while all other cases have been administered by the U.S.
University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. Neither African immigrants nor individuals with few or any ties to an ancestral Native American tribe would qualify. Share This article is part of a symposium on the upcoming arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College.
Reid Trautz (@RTrautz) is founding Director of the Practice & Professionalism Center at the American Immigration Lawyers Association , where he provides practice advisory services to members. It’s in your long-term best interest to upgrade your appearance and aptitude on all your video calls.
Clearbox builds solutions to simplify the US immigration process for DIY applicants. In 2023, Clearbox raised a friends and family round, built its first suite of products, and onboarded its first paid customers. descrybe.ai , a free generative-AI legal search engine, has summarized 1.8
A poll at the University of NorthCarolina found that conservative students are 300 times more likely to self-censor themselves due to the intolerance of opposing views on our campuses. Another recently discussed poll showed roughly 60 percent of students say that they fear speaking openly in class.
They complained to an immigration and employment attorney about long hours and poor living conditions. Alaska, Montana and NorthCarolina, for example, do not require law enforcement agencies to collect or report information related to civil forfeiture. Based on his advice, they quit their jobs in protest.
In addition, we recorded interviews about immigration, U.S. Holly Cooper: Associate Director of the Immigration Law Clinic at the University of California, Davis, School of Law. Paul Stam: Speaker Pro Tempore in the NorthCarolina House of Representatives. The Global Immigration Crisis. tech GCs, and election laws.
Now an author, attorney and visiting professor of creative writing at University of NorthCarolina Wilmington, Moezzi tells her students to ask for help if they are in crisis, something she was too proud to do. “I have a wonderful husband, I have a wonderful life. Things were not objectively going wrong.”.
Harper , a dispute arising from the NorthCarolina legislature’s efforts to draw a new congressional map in response to the 2020 census. 29): A challenge to the Biden administration’s policy of prioritizing certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and detention. 303 Creative and Moore v. United States (Nov.
Texas (concerning President Joe Biden’s immigration policies), and two cases involving Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina revisiting the issue of affirmative action in higher education. Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v.
As they considered the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 12, the justices wondered aloud how the case would affect hypothetical state efforts to ban products from out-of-state companies that employ unauthorized immigrants, forbid labor unions, or refuse to fund certain types of health care. economy.
Singh (consolidated for one hour of oral argument), in which the justices will consider notice requirements in immigration cases; McElrath v. Garland and Garland v.
Justice Grodin is joined in the brief by former state high court jurists from Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, and NorthCarolina (two of the former justices are from NorthCarolina). Combined, the seven amici have almost 100 years of state supreme court experience.
The argument comes less than a month after the justices heard oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of Republican-led states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy after the Biden administration opted not to do so. The NorthCarolina legislature passed the voter-ID law at the center of the case in December 2018.
Harper, in which NorthCarolina legislators argued that state courts could not override state legislatures on federal election districts. The dire warnings concerned a hearing of an appeal in Moore v. Likewise, it will not matter that the conservative “coup” never came.
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that two Republican legislators in NorthCarolina can join a lawsuit to defend the constitutionality of the state’s voter-identification law. The NorthCarolina NAACP then went to federal court, where it argued that the law violates both federal voting rights laws and the Constitution.
Asian American and Pacific Islander interest groups specify that AAPI women face significant barriers to obtaining abortion care due to language and economic barriers, as well as immigration-related challenges.
Agency rulemaking across the federal government – from fiduciary duties and antitrust enforcement , to telecommunications and the authority of the FDA , to immigration policy and nuclear waste storage, among many other issues – has been challenged as unlawful under the principles of the MQD.
At a rally in NorthCarolina , he suggested imposing a 10-20% tariff on all imported goods. He also said that he would impose a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico if the country does not help curb the flow of immigrants and drugs over the border. He has also suggested a massive 60% to 100% tariff on Chinese origin goods.
Here is the column: Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s “train whistle” docket with cases on abortion, guns, immigration, and other issues barreling down the track. University of NorthCarolina. Both the Harvard and NorthCarolina at Chapel Hill admissions criteria were upheld by lower courts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content