SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. Share The justices returned to the bench on Jan. Garland and Garland v. .

Government 99

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 99

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 18, 2022

Harper , a dispute arising from the North Carolina legislature’s efforts to draw a new congressional map in response to the 2020 census. 29): A challenge to the Biden administration’s policy of prioritizing certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and detention. 303 Creative and Moore v. United States (Nov.

Laws 104

Laws Statute Immigration Calendaring 104

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 18, 2022

The argument comes less than a month after the justices heard oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of Republican-led states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy after the Biden administration opted not to do so. The North Carolina legislature passed the voter-ID law at the center of the case in December 2018.

Litigating 101

Litigating Litigation Attorney Court 101

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

To the contrary, in the year it was ratified (1868), thirty of thirty-seven states explicitly criminalized abortion by statute.” According to the group, the court wrongly concluded in Roe that the 19th-century statutes had been enacted to protect women from dangerous operations, rather than to protect fetuses.

Stare Decisis 93

Stare Decisis Court Laws Statute 93

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

Agency rulemaking across the federal government – from fiduciary duties and antitrust enforcement , to telecommunications and the authority of the FDA , to immigration policy and nuclear waste storage, among many other issues – has been challenged as unlawful under the principles of the MQD.

Statute 85

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 85