JURIST

MAY 9, 2024

Civil rights groups filed a complaint on Thursday against Iowa state officials to stop the state’s recently enacted immigration law from going into effect on July 1. The law makes it a crime for a foreign national to enter Iowa after having been deported from the US in the past, regardless of current immigration status.

Immigration 104

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Felony 104

The Crime Report

MARCH 3, 2022

For example, in 20 states, — including California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Wyoming — a pardon offers the only way to regain firearms rights lost because of a past conviction. Put simply, a pardon is a powerful sign of “official forgiveness,” that can help someone get their life back on track.

Felony 98

Felony Immigration Laws 98

JURIST

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

” Garland led the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing. ” Through a myriad of topics, including college admissions, the border and immigration, and social media, Garland continuously swore to keep politics out of his investigations and processes in the DOJ: I know these are divisive times.

Immigration 80

Immigration Attorney Legal Legal 80

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 26, 2024

Oklahoma headline the Supreme Court’s October argument calendar , which was released on Friday morning. The November argument calendar , released at the same time, includes cases brought under the Medicare Act, immigration law, and securities fraud laws. Oklahoma (Oct. VanDerStok and Glossip v. And in Glossip v. Stinnie (Oct.

Court 115

Court Immigration Calendaring Attorney 115

Constitutional Law Reporter

MAY 17, 2022

The justices heard arguments in six cases, which addressed issues ranging from methods of execution for death-row inmates to whether a high school football coach should be able to pray at midfield to the federal government’s controversial “remain in Mexico” immigration policy. Oklahoma v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Constitutional Law Legal 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2024

Oklahoma , 22-6500 Issues : (1) Whether a court may require a defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable fact finder would have returned a guilty verdict to obtain relief for a violation of Brady v. relisted after the Sept. 8 and Jan. 5 conferences; rescheduled before the Dec. 1 conference) Glossip v.

Court 118

Court Government Laws Immigration 118

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 14, 2021

Garland is an immigration case. An immigration judge rejected Abdulla’s arguments, and the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected his appeal as untimely because it had been filed beyond the 30-day appeal deadline and had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting certification of the appeal out of time.

Immigration 98

Immigration Punitive Damages Court Compensatory Damages 98

JURIST

JANUARY 29, 2025

The Oklahoma State Board of Educationon Tuesday to approved a new administrative rule proposed by State Superintendent Ryan Waltersthat would require parents to disclose their children’s immigration status when enrolling them in school. The Oklahoma proposal awaits final approvals from the governor and state legislature.

Immigration 194

Immigration Education Government Legal 194

JURIST

MARCH 16, 2025

The Trump administration moved on Friday to dismiss lawsuits against Iowa and Oklahoma regarding state laws criminalizing undocumented immigration. It also required noncitizens convicted of violating its provisions to leave the state of Oklahoma. Additionally, the DOJ cited Arizona v.

Immigration 143

Immigration Laws Attorney Government 143

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 10, 2025

Calumet Shreveport Refining and Oklahoma v. Bondi (March 24) A dispute over questions relating to the 30-day deadline to seek review of a ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying withholding of deportation. Oklahoma v. Two of those three cases EPA v. EPA are now scheduled for argument in March.

Court 79

Court Calendaring Immigration Court Decisions 79

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 15, 2022

immigration court. Oklahoma v. Texas (April 26): Whether the Department of Homeland Security must continue to enforce the Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy begun by President Donald Trump that requires asylum seekers at the southern border to stay in Mexico while awaiting a hearing in U.S.

Calendaring 106

Calendaring Contract Immigration Court 106

Above The Law

APRIL 7, 2025

Immigration Barretts opinions in the area of agency deference specific to immigration cases have evolved, reflecting a preference for judicial restraint and a pragmatic approach to standing and executive authority. In Biden v. By United States v. Texas (2023), Barretts skepticism toward broad standing claims became more evident.

Statute 86

Statute Court Government Immigration 86

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 5, 2021

City and County of San Francisco, California , involving an attempt by 14 states to intervene to defend the Trump administration’s controversial “public charge” immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma v. relisted after the Sept. 27 conference). Bond , 20-1668.

Punitive Damages 54

Punitive Damages Compensatory Damages Court Statute 54