SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 3, 2021

Congress created a process known as “adjustment of status” so that immigrants physically present in the United States could change their status to that of a lawful permanent resident (i.e., In 2012, Patel was placed in deportation proceedings before an immigration judge. The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case on Monday.

Immigration 145

Immigration Statute Government Court 145

JURIST

AUGUST 22, 2021

” The statute for apprehension and detention of non-citizen immigrants, 8 U.S. .” ” The statute for apprehension and detention of non-citizen immigrants, 8 U.S. Code § 1226 , did not previously specify the burden of proof to be met at immigration bond hearings.

Immigration 197

Immigration Court Statute Government 197

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Monday limited the ability of federal courts to review certain factual findings in immigration proceedings that determine whether noncitizens will be deported or will be allowed to remain in the country. But the Supreme Court held that a federal immigration statute — 8 U.S.C. The ruling in Patel v.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Statute Attorney 145

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2021

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, adopting a rigid interpretation of a federal statute that requires the government to serve a “notice to appear” in order to trigger the “stop-time” rule. That rule can foreclose access to immigration relief by preventing noncitizens from accruing the time required for eligibility.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Rules Government Laws 145

HowAppealing

MARCH 10, 2025

Five Questions About the Khalil Case: The government’s arrest and detention of a pro-Palestinian Columbia student (and green card holder) raises difficult questions about both technical immigration statutes and the First Amendment.” ” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.

Statute 100

Statute Immigration Government 100

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 14, 2023

Congress extended the Immigration and Nationality Act, which regulates immigration into the United States, in 1988 to give immigration enforcement authorities, now the Department of Homeland Security, the power to automatically deport noncitizens convicted of an “aggravated felony” at the state or federal level.

Immigration 115

Immigration Statute Felony Court 115

JURIST

MAY 16, 2022

The US Supreme Court Monday held in a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett “[f]ederal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of any judgment relating to the granting of discretionary relief in immigration proceedings enumerated under 8 US Code § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).” ” In Patel v.

Immigration 197

Immigration Court Statute Laws 197

JURIST

JUNE 7, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday on an immigrant status case regarding noncitizens seeking to change their immigration status from temporary protected status (TPS) to lawful permanent residency.

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Court Rules Statute 188

JURIST

MAY 25, 2021

In 1998, an immigration judge found that Palomar-Santiago had committed an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws when he was convicted for driving under the influence. In that case, it was held that under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions such as that of Palomar-Santiago’s are not aggravated felonies.

Court Rules 196

Court Rules Court Felony Immigration 196

LawSites

JUNE 21, 2023

A new generative AI product for immigration lawyers announced today is designed to help them conduct research, draft and summarize complex legal documents, and engage with potential clients through a chat interface. “Immigration law is an incredibly complex, high-stakes area of law. Called Visalaw.ai Called Visalaw.ai

Immigration 111

Immigration Drafting Laws Legal Documents 111

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 13, 2022

Pursuant to the post-removal order statute, 8 U.S.C. The question before the court was whether the post-removal order statute authorized his prolonged detention, and if so, whether the government was required to provide a bond hearing before an immigration judge after six months of detention. 1231 , the government detained him.

Immigration 98

Immigration Court Rules Statute Court 98

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 14, 2022

Share On Monday, the Supreme Court sided with the government in a pair of cases brought by noncitizens who are under deportation orders and were in lengthy detention, rejecting lower courts’ rights-protective interpretation of the relevant detention statute and blocking an important avenue for injunctive relief in immigration detention cases.

Immigration 98

Immigration Statute Government Court 98

Attorney at Work

MAY 31, 2022

The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. A Chicago immigration lawyer moved for an emergency stay of removal for a client after an asylum application was denied. The Tennessee lawyer failed to add a calendar reminder to track the statute of limitations deadline.

Calendaring 319

Calendaring Court Lawyer Lawyers 319

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 28, 2021

The charge of criminal re-entry requires the prior existence of a removal order entered by a federal immigration agency. That statute, 8 U.S.C. However, Ross resisted characterizing the removal order as either a “legal nullity” or equivalent to the immigration agency lacking jurisdiction to enter the order at all.

Immigration 98

Immigration Statute Government Legal 98

LegalReader

AUGUST 19, 2021

District Judge Miranda Du observed the racially charged beginnings of United States Code Section 1326, the first federal statute criminalizing illegal re-entry after deportation or removal. In her ruling, U.S.

Immigration 111

Immigration Statute Laws 111

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 12, 2021

The court must decide which of two federal statutes governs these migrants’ eligibility to be released on bond. But by statute, a withholding claim can be reviewed only as part of the review of a removal order. Surely, a final order of removal can’t mean one thing … in one statute and another in another.

Immigration 113

Immigration Statute Government Court 113

JURIST

JUNE 8, 2022

” The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found “that this conviction was a crime involving moral turpitude that made him ineligible for cancellation of removal” from the United States. ” The post Ninth Circuit rules possession of forged SSN is grounds for deportation appeared first on JURIST - News.

Construction 197

Construction Immigration Statute Government 197

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in two related immigration cases , Johnson v. In both cases, noncitizens who are under deportation orders are challenging their prolonged detention – sometimes many months or even years — without the safeguard of a bond hearing before an immigration judge. In Zadvydas v.

Immigration 145

Immigration Statute Government Court 145

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 9, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to hear four new cases, including a First Amendment challenge to a federal law that prohibits encouraging illegal immigration. The post Justices take up four new cases, including challenge to federal ban on encouraging illegal immigration appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 103

Immigration Statute Court Court Rules 103

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 28, 2023

1324(a)(1)(iv) , the federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully, violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. She asked Fletcher, “[E]xactly how [do] you want us to rewrite the statute?” knowing full well that doing so would be unlawful.

Immigration 98

Immigration Laws Statute Government 98

SCOTUSBlog

SEPTEMBER 17, 2022

Helaman Hansen ran an immigration-advising service called Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce. A federal court in California convicted Hansen of multiple counts of fraud, as well as convincing two of his customers to overstay their visas and participate in his adoption program in violation of the encourage-or-induce statute.

Immigration 78

Immigration Statute Government Tort 78

Paralegal Bootcamp

JULY 25, 2022

This includes the processes used to identify the laws and documents that apply to the facts of a specific case, including statutes, regulations, and court opinions. A large part of this consists of conducting legal research. This is why paralegal training in the skill of written communication is essential. A Protector.

Paralegals 246

Paralegals Paralegal Drafting Legal Assistance 246

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2021

Mayorkas that adjustment of status is reserved for those who were inspected at the border and admitted to the United States by an immigration officer, thus disqualifying the majority of those granted Temporary Protected Status. The court ruled in Sanchez v. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for the court.

Immigration 142

Immigration Government Statute Court Rules 142

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 24, 2021

Eight years later, an immigration judge found that his California conviction for driving under the influence was an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws. Ashcroft that, under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions like Palomar-Santiago’s are not aggravated felonies.

Felony 133

Felony Court Immigration Statute 133

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2023

He pointed to statutes that do not require a pending proceeding and claimed they were understood by courts to qualify as obstruction when Congress added the offense to the list of aggravated felonies. The post No clear path on how court will rule after oral arguments in two immigration cases Monday appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 113

Immigration Felony Court Statute 113

JURIST

JANUARY 3, 2024

The law creates a misdemeanor offense for violation of the statute and a felony crime for multiple offenses. It also empowers state magistrate judges to hear immigration cases and issue removal orders, in addition to giving law enforcement the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the law. Last month, Abbott signed SB 4.

Immigration 118

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Felony 118

Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

Supreme Court upheld a federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully. In reaching its decision, the Court acknowledged that an expansive reading of the statute would render it unconstitutional. In United States v. Hansen , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Statute Construction 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 6, 2021

statutes and regulations. The Immigration and Nationality Act allows migrants pursuing so-called “withholding only” relief to be released on bond at some point; the court must decide which release statute applies. Some courts hold that claims of U.S. citizenship may also be raised). 1231 governs. In addition, in Zadvydas v.

Immigration 128

Immigration Statute Government Court 128

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 12, 2021

In asylum cases, the immigration judge is responsible for making credibility determinations as trier-of-fact. But the statute doesn’t say what the federal courts should do if the BIA fails to expressly find the presumption rebutted. The unanimous Supreme Court rejected that approach.

Immigration 104

Immigration Statute Court Government 104

JURIST

JULY 6, 2024

The legal position is that the statute requires “the most clear and explicit words” to constitute an ouster clause and override the presumption of legislative intention that executive decisions are justiciable by way of judicial review. The legal dispute arose from the well-established Anisminic principle in English common law.

Court 104

Court Immigration Litigation Litigating 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 4, 2022

De George , the Supreme Court held that the term “crime involving moral turpitude” in federal immigration law is not unconstitutionally vague. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. In its 1951 decision in Jordan v. He became a lawful permanent resident after marrying a U.S. citizen the following year. 1227(a)(2)(A).

Construction 85

Construction Court Immigration Statute 85

SCOTUSBlog

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

In 2011, after 60 years in which the statute did not lead to a reported decision, Kentucky sued the operators of PokerStars, an online poker platform, to recover the combined poker losses of Kentucky citizens. A Kentucky state court awarded Kentucky $870 million, calculated as three times $290 million in losses.

Statute 104

Statute Court Immigration Government 104

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 26, 2023

The Supreme Court has issued a number of decisions in recent years limiting the reach of the federal wire-fraud statute, which outlaws the use of “the wires” – including internet and phone lines – to commit fraud. The court reasoned that the focus of the wire-fraud statute is the misuse of U.S. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.

Statute 77

Statute Depositions Immigration Court 77

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 20, 2023

Both an immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected her request. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, Santos-Zacaria argued that the board violated Department of Homeland Security regulations by basing its decision on facts the immigration judge did not find. Appealing to the U.S.

Immigration 97

Immigration Government Court Statute 97

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

After all, like most administrative claims, it rests on a federal statute, not the common law, and it requires the agency to establish facts that do not match any cause of action known to the common law in 1791 (when the states ratified the Seventh Amendment).

Government 142

Government Immigration Cause of Action Litigation 142

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2023

Share In an opinion released on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that noncitizens subject to deportation do not have to ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider its allegedly erroneous decisions before seeking judicial review in the federal courts of appeals. The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld that decision.

Court Rules 111

Court Rules Court Immigration Litigation 111

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2021

Monteilh’s identity and work as a confidential informant was revealed two years later, in connection with an immigration fraud case that the government eventually asked the court to dismiss. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Statute 115

Statute Government Court Litigation 115