Remove Immigration Remove Statute Remove Wyoming
article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The defendants filed their reply brief on January 22, 2020, reiterating their arguments that the Tenth Circuit should review the entire remand order, not just the district court’s determination that removal was not proper under the federal-officer removal statute, and that there were multiple valid grounds for removal. City of Oakland v.

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DHS had waived the requirements of NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and other laws pursuant to Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. 22, 2018); Wyoming v. Trump , No. 1:17 -cv-00253 (D.D.C. California v. Bureau of Land Management , No.

Court 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices won’t intervene in dispute over transgender rights and bathrooms

SCOTUSBlog

The justices also added a First Amendment case and an immigration case to their docket for next term, and they ordered a lower court to take a closer look at a wrongful-death lawsuit by the parents of a man who died after police officers pinned him to the ground while he was handcuffed. Two new grants on immigration, free speech.

article thumbnail

May 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. Parties Voluntarily Dismissed Appeals of Federal Court Decision Requiring More Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. Federal Court Allowed Trade Group and Wyoming to Intervene in Challenge to Oil and Gas Leases.

Court 40
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation groups, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions.

Court 40