This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. An Indiana lawyer never responded to the plaintiffs – his clients in a multidistrict product liability case – when the court requested further details to avoid a motion to dismiss. The firm had filed a voluntary dismissal back in 2014.
This case presents whether a resident deprived of those rights can sue a publicly owned and operated nursing home under Section 1983, which provides a cause of action against government actors who deprive anyone of rights secured by the “laws” of the United States, meaning other federal statutes, including spending clause enactments.
Kirschenbaum — On September 30, we blogged about the ongoing dispute and litigation around the use of contract pharmacies under the 340B Drug Discount Program (click here ). District Court for the Southern District of Indiana decided several substantive motions in Eli Lilly & Co. By Faraz Siddiqui & Alan M. Last week, the U.S.
There are two different statutes regarding Federal Court exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. 251 (2013) (patent litigation attorney malpractice lawsuit does not arise under the Patent Act). The statute abuts and parallels the Constitution, and that means statutory interpretation becomes constitutional interpretation.
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Rudy Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Omri Sender , Advisor and Litigator in Public International Law. Moderator: Hannah Buxbaum , Vice President for International Affairs, Indiana University; John E. Extraterritoriality in Statutes and Regulations.
Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia filed suit, arguing that EPA’s rulemaking process circumvented the Clean Air Act’s cooperative-federalism mandate by forcing its own top-down control over state-level air-pollution reduction, and moved to stay the federal plan pending judicial review. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.
Two of the cases involve whether litigants must wait for administrative proceedings to conclude before challenging the authority of federal agencies in federal court. Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in five cases last week. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.:
In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” The case has already been rescheduled three times, clearly indicating it’s on at least one of the justices’ radar. Next up is Texas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 21-379.
Broadcasters already upload this information to their public file, and this update merely brings the FCC’s rules in line with the requirements of federal statute and thus has no practical effect on a station’s political file obligations. We wrote in more detail about these changes, here.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion on Wednesday setting aside the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana’s ruling that several Indiana abortion restrictions from Indiana Code Section 16-34-2-1 were unconstitutional.
States can and should ensure such statutes provide extensive due process protections. Indeed, both can be reconciled with public opinion, as most Americans both support the Second Amendment as an individual right and back reasonable limitations on it.
Previously in the term, Justice Amy Coney Barrett similarly declined to grant a request for emergency relief on behalf of eight students at Indiana University against a vaccine mandate. Trustees of Indiana University : Indiana University allows for medical or religious exemptions.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
The opinion cited a central holding from Loper Bright , that “courts need not and under the APA may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.” It’s asking the Southern District of Indiana to weigh in on the definition of the word “protein” under the judicial authority Loper Bright grants.
The first installment of The General Counsel Report 2025 reads like something Indiana Jones dusted off from an ancient tomb. Nearly one-third of GCs reported a rise in disputes and civil litigation, while 35 percent flagged internal investigations as the top trigger for legal action.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The cases from injuries last year are just now being filed under the statute of limitations, but it has been another bumper crop of Thanksgiving torts. The result is a horn of plenty for litigators.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Given this “unmitigable prejudice,” the court concluded “that this litigation cannot, in good conscience, continue in the Tribe’s absence.”
Soon after the court issued its final late-night order, Montgomery was put to death by lethal injection at the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana. Four separate cases relating to Montgomery’s execution reached the justices in emergency litigation over the past several days. She was pronounced dead at 1:31 a.m.
In their petition, the challengers argue that the Federal Circuit’s decision contradicts a prior Supreme Court decision that held that Section 232 is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch because the statute establishes clear preconditions that the president must follow. The case is Does v.
Most people following the litigation over S.B. The Supreme Court could neither enjoin the flagrantly unconstitutional abortion restrictions nor lift the circuit court’s unexplained order pausing lower-court litigation, the “rule-of-law story” goes, because the Supreme Court’s hands were tied.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. s consumer protection statute. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Koati. and non-U.S.
COUNT FOUR (Violation of a Public Safety Statute: D.C. COUNT FIVE (Violation of a Public Safety Statute: D.C. On the existing evidence, they will likely fail on appeal, even if they survive the trial level litigation. COUNT TWO (Aiding and Abetting Assault and Battery). Code § 22-1322 – Incitement to Riot).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content