This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Katie Jenner in her official capacity as the Indiana Secretary of Education on Friday over a newly passed state law that bans “instruction” on “human sexuality” to students in kindergarten to third grade. The case is in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.
“Supreme Court Signals Another Corruption Law to Be Pared Back; Court has reined in reach of federal corruption statutes; Would be win for Indiana mayor who got $13,000 gratuity”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.
Indiana Court of Appeals sided with Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb on Tuesday allowing him to withdraw the state from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act benefits program. Holcomb and Payne sought to reverse the decision in the Indiana Court of Appeals by claiming that the trial court abused its discretion.
In Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. 1983 is a US federal statute that grants individuals the right to civil action for the deprivation of their rights. The case was first brought by Gorgi Talevski after his conditions worsened under the care of a state-run nursing facility in Indiana.
The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. An Indiana lawyer never responded to the plaintiffs – his clients in a multidistrict product liability case – when the court requested further details to avoid a motion to dismiss. The firm had filed a voluntary dismissal back in 2014.
The appeal cited an Indiana voter identification law requiring a photo identification presented when voting in person as justification for Kansas’ requirements: This Court’s decision in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181 (2008), set the stage for this dispute.
Leaving intact the nation’s “most aggressively broad” statute criminalizing certain speech and conduct directed toward school employees, the Masters case involved Johnathan Masters, an education graduate student who distributed surveys to secondary school students as part of his research.
As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C. The case before the Court involves James Snyder, who is the former mayor of Portage, Indiana. First, the majority found that the statutory text strongly suggests that §666—like §201(b)— is a bribery statute, not a gratuities statute.
This case presents whether a resident deprived of those rights can sue a publicly owned and operated nursing home under Section 1983, which provides a cause of action against government actors who deprive anyone of rights secured by the “laws” of the United States, meaning other federal statutes, including spending clause enactments.
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana decided several substantive motions in Eli Lilly & Co. A key issue before the court was whether, despite the relevant statute’s silence on the issue, Congress intended to allow the use of contract pharmacies. Last week, the U.S. 1:21-cv-00081-SEB-MJD (S.D.
1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power. VCR is a government nursing facility in Indiana owned by petitioner Health and Hospital Corp., Background. a municipal entity.
That prompted the challengers – Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia, along with trade associations and companies affected by the plan – to come to the Supreme Court last fall, asking the justices to intervene. In September, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. In a brief, unsigned order on Dec. Bissonnette v.
There are two different statutes regarding Federal Court exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. The statute abuts and parallels the Constitution, and that means statutory interpretation becomes constitutional interpretation. by Dennis Crouch. ” Id. The US Constitution link is important. In the recent case of Gunn v.
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
In 2016 Michigan enacted a statute permitting licensed retailers (the third tier) to offer home delivery. An Indiana retailer, Lebamoff Enterprises, sued the State, arguing that the statute violated the dormant Commerce Clause by allowing in-state—but not out-of-state—retailers to deliver alcohol to Michigan residents.
Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Rudy Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Moderator: Hannah Buxbaum , Vice President for International Affairs, Indiana University; John E. Chair in Legal Ethics and Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Hosted by: Cedric Ryngaert.
Including improper drug claims in the labeling of non-drug products can expose your company to liability from the FDA/FTC to consumer actions brought under state consumer protections statutes, class action lawsuits, etc. Ensure the Validity and Compliance of All Other Product Claims.
When HRSA threatened enforcement action and penalties, several companies sued the HHS in federal district courts in Maryland, Indiana, Delaware, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia to enjoin those enforcement actions (see list below). Because of concerns that these contract pharmacies, which include some of the largest chains in the U.S.,
Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia filed suit, arguing that EPA’s rulemaking process circumvented the Clean Air Act’s cooperative-federalism mandate by forcing its own top-down control over state-level air-pollution reduction, and moved to stay the federal plan pending judicial review. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.
Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. 1983 ; and (2) whether, assuming spending clause statutes ever give rise to private rights enforceable via Section 1983, the Federal Nursing Home Amendments Act of 1987 ’s transfer and medication rules do so.” Norfolk Southern Railway Co.:
In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” The case has already been rescheduled three times, clearly indicating it’s on at least one of the justices’ radar. Next up is Texas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 21-379.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Monday upheld an Indiana law requiring medical providers to report complications “arising from” abortions to the state. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky filed a complaint arguing that the law is unconstitutionally vague.
Indiana (1972) 406 U.S. subdivision (c) and rule 4.576(b) of the California Rules of Court.” ” (Link added.) 715; In re Davis (1973) 8 Cal.3d 3d 798; U.S. 14th amend.; I, § 7; Welf. & & Inst. Code, § 5358, subds. (a)(1)(B), 4th 1025; People v.
Broadcasters already upload this information to their public file, and this update merely brings the FCC’s rules in line with the requirements of federal statute and thus has no practical effect on a station’s political file obligations. We wrote in more detail about these changes, here.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion on Wednesday setting aside the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana’s ruling that several Indiana abortion restrictions from Indiana Code Section 16-34-2-1 were unconstitutional.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The plaintiffs contend that the mandate violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
The ties that bind: Giving birth in Indiana is making a change for the humane. I know long-arm statutes are a thing, but Missouri's attempt to ban abortions that happen in other states would make the court that wrote Wickard blush. [ * Word is bonded: Houston Senator is pushing for people to front part of their bail before they walk.
“Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Indiana’s ‘revenge porn’ law”: Dan Carden of The Times of Munster, Indiana has this report. Niki Kelly of The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne, Indiana reports that “ Indiana’s revenge-porn law upheld; State high court unanimous in Steuben County case.”
Previously in the term, Justice Amy Coney Barrett similarly declined to grant a request for emergency relief on behalf of eight students at Indiana University against a vaccine mandate. Trustees of Indiana University : Indiana University allows for medical or religious exemptions.
The party briefs mostly focused on the word “rewarded” in the statute. James Snyder, the former mayor of Portage Indiana accused of having criminally solicited a payment in this case, seemed calm and upbeat. Justice Kagan asked if the required mental state in the statute helps to alleviate that concern. We even briefly chatted.
The opinion cited a central holding from Loper Bright , that “courts need not and under the APA may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.” It’s asking the Southern District of Indiana to weigh in on the definition of the word “protein” under the judicial authority Loper Bright grants.
The first installment of The General Counsel Report 2025 reads like something Indiana Jones dusted off from an ancient tomb. Between the radical shift in priorities and the administration committing to a speedrun to reverse decades of regulatory framework ( courts and statutes be damned ), corporate legal has to move fast.
In 2020, parents in Indiana were given a warning in a Facebook post that the Indiana State Police seized holiday edibles featuring packaging that resembles that of actual name brands — but with the word “medicated” printed on the wrapper along with cannabis symbols. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 32; 285 S.W.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The cases from injuries last year are just now being filed under the statute of limitations, but it has been another bumper crop of Thanksgiving torts. Macy’s Parade also did not disappoint with its balloon-related mishaps.
Soon after the court issued its final late-night order, Montgomery was put to death by lethal injection at the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana. The statute does not apply to a state’s procedural rules on issues like scheduling the execution date, the government told the justices. She was pronounced dead at 1:31 a.m.
The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c. ,
In their petition, the challengers argue that the Federal Circuit’s decision contradicts a prior Supreme Court decision that held that Section 232 is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch because the statute establishes clear preconditions that the president must follow. The case is Does v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content