This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A three-judge panel of the Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that a controversial Texas law, Senate Bill (SB) 4 , will remain on hold as litigation continues. SB4, the controversial Texas law that is the subject of this continued litigation, was originally signed into law in December 2023.
The Minnesota Supreme Court Wednesday upheld a state law prohibiting convicted felons from voting while on probation or parole in a 3-1 ruling. The law at issue, Minn. The appellants, two convicted felons, argued that the law violates Article VII , Section 1, of the Minnesota Constitution.
He authors a series linking law school canonical cases with intellectual property counterparts. ISE is an Iowa LLC with its principal place of business in Coralville, Iowa (in the Northern District of Iowa). and litigating patents away from D.C. By Avery Welker. Trimble, Inc. Trimble Inc. , Trimble Inc. ,
Six major book publishers Friday sued the Florida Department of Education, challenging a 2023 state law used to restrict books in school libraries. The plaintiffs are suing on the basis that the state law is overbroad and violates the freedom of expression protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] 1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S.
This case began when Robyn Morgan filed in Iowa federal court a wage-and-hour complaint on behalf of herself and similarly situated employees against Sundance, Inc., Section 2 directs that arbitration contracts are enforceable in federal court, except “upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
” (with the caveat that examiners and litigators are a smaller n). Litigator: 10%. Finally, here’s the “patent law” definition of “specification” from Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, Second Edition, published in 1957: Specification.
But what happens if a party begins to litigate a case, and then seeks to compel arbitration several months later? Robyn Morgan worked at a Sundance-owned Taco Bell in Iowa in 2015, and the application that she used to apply for her job contained an arbitration clause. In Morgan v.
The Education Department has launched investigations into five states whose prohibitions on universal mask mandates in schools may run afoul of civil rights laws protecting students with disabilities, reports the New York Times.
Muller is the Bouma fellow in law and professor of law at the University of Iowa College of Law. Democratic National Committee set the path for the six-justice majority of the Supreme Court to reject challenges to two Arizona laws. The Democratic National Committee challenged the two Arizona laws.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? We share what we found below. In addition, we just learned of a new NIJ study on the use of Chatbots in the Criminal Justice System to add to our list of online helpers.
The holding is important–repeated and specific threats of litigation by an out-of-state patentee can be sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction for a declaratory judgment action. [2] ISI is a subsidiary of Trimble that is both incorporated and headquartered in Iowa. In 2019, Trimble and ISE sued for declaratory judgment.
A US federal judge on Tuesday once again blocked enforcement of an Iowalaw that required the removal of books describing sexual acts from public school libraries. However, he emphasized that Iowa schools were already doing that. NetChoice , a recent Supreme Court ruling on speech regulation.
Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law; Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; and Jason Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law. Litigants shouldn’t get to choose the judge who decides their case. To us, that seems like an uncontroversial proposition.
The justices and the litigants devoted substantial time discussing when a party’s decision to adopt an objectively reasonable, but incorrect, interpretation would satisfy the FCA’s knowledge requirement. Split panels of the 7th Circuit had held it was never relevant – a view soundly rejected Tuesday by at least a majority of the justices.
As discussed Wednesday in part one of this three-part series, these posts are a collection of reflections on the 10th anniversary of the ReInvent Law Silicon Valley event, held in Mountain View Calif., on March 8, 2013, and what it meant to the authors and to the broader movement for innovation in law. ReInvent Law was shocking.
Share In 2018, California voters approved Proposition 12, a ballot initiative that its supporters describe as the country’s strongest law to protect farm animals. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a challenge to the constitutionality of the law.
For torts scholars, it has been a bonanza of interesting issues touching on every element of defamation law. Nunes will be allowed to litigate his claim that Lizza defamed him by claiming that he secretly moved his farm from California to Iowa and linked the move to the alleged use of undocumented labor.
Dmitry Karshtedt is an Associate Professor of Law at GW Law whose work I’ve followed for years. Below he introduces the core idea underlying his new article on nonobviousness forthcoming in the IowaLaw Review. Nonobviousness and Time. Dmitry Karshtedt. Let’s take one illustration.
the morning of a critical meeting at Harvard Law School, where I worked. Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legal research startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer.
I’m teaching my usual Introduction to Intellectual Property course, together with an especially large Civil Procedure class (which at Iowa is 4 credit hours), and the Iowa Innovation, Business & Law Center is running an exciting speaker series on Genetics, Law and Society.
Just a few weeks ago, we wrote about the Radio Music License Committee (RMLC) filing a lawsuit against Global Music Rights (GMR) alleging that GMR was violating the antitrust laws by offering an all or nothing blanket license for rights to play the songs written by certain songwriters now represented by this new performing rights organization.
Jeffrey Hammons is an Associate Attorney at the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Chicago, IL, where his litigation practice covers issues of pollution control and energy law. Jeffrey graduated from Columbia Law School in 2016. FCU-2017-0004 (Iowa Util. Follow Jeffrey on twitter at @jt_hammons. Footnotes. [1]
A district judge in Iowa issued a temporary injunction on the state’s new “ fetal heartbeat law ” Monday following a suit by abortion providers to block the strict abortion ban, formally known as House File (H.F.) The suit prompting the temporary injunction was brought by Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc.,
Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds Tuesday announced her administration would seek to reinstate a 2018 state law prohibiting abortion after six weeks, when embryonic cardiac activity is detected. The law was challenged in state court by Planned Parenthood and Iowa’s Emma Goldman Clinic.
Access to bathrooms is not the only LGBTQ issue being increasingly litigated. In December, a federal judge blocked certain provisions of an Iowalaw that prohibited school libraries from distributing books containing LGBTQ issues.
The court ruled that the Supreme Court had not formally overruled earlier case law supporting the theory that registration supports general jurisdiction. The law defines an animal facility as any place that houses or breeds animals used for food production, agriculture, or research. By contrast, the petition in Mallory v.
If litigated, the state’s nuanced dog liability laws would come into effect. Pennsylvania has a quirky set of laws. That codified status triggers common law strict liability even if there is no specific law imposing such liability on owners. She was watching the dogs for her roommate. Rosenberry v.
The exchange occurred as Taub was being questioned on the meaning of “sectarian” under the law. Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reinstated an Iowalaw on Friday that law requires public school libraries to remove books that are not “age appropriate,” such as when they describe or depict “sex acts.” ” The law, SF 496 , also forbids education about gender identity.
1983 claim seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence begins to run at the end of state-court litigation denying DNA testing, including any appeals (as the U.S. Iowa — and otherwise commandeering state courts and state agencies to carry out a federal child-placement program. Goertz , 21-442. relisted after the Jan. 21 and Feb.
Morrissey-Berru , under which employees deemed “ministers” of religious institutions are not covered by various employment and discrimination laws. Federal Trade Commission , 21-86 , involves the manufacturer of the law-enforcement device immortalized in the formerly trademarked phrase, “ Don’t tase me, bro! 10 and Jan. 14 conference).
That view was captured this week in the comment of Iowa school board member Rachel Wall, who said: “The purpose of a public ed is to not teach kids what the parents want. Yet administrators have an incentive to yield to the mob, even at the cost of millions in litigation costs. It is to teach them what society needs them to know.
It can be next to impossible to see how law enforcement — in league with paid, self-styled “experts” — spreads new, often unproven methods. At the time, it didn’t sound plausible even as a one-off gambit, let alone something pervasive that law enforcement nationwide had embraced as legitimate. . … Make it sing!”. I was wrong.
Similarly, the court has ruled that a boy harmed by another child while in foster care was also bound by medical malpractice law. The lawsuit against Broadbent — and the questions it raises about the broadness of Utah’s medical malpractice laws — comes during a national reckoning with how sexual assault survivors are treated by the law.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Conservation Law Foundation v. Derivative Litigation , No. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. filed Sept.
Share A case about a California animal-welfare law became a springboard on Tuesday for the justices to explore how individual states might try to impose their moral views on their neighbors. On one hand, some justices expressed concern that striking down Proposition 12 would lead to the invalidation of a wide range of laws in other states.
Concepcion involved a state law that treated arbitration clauses unfavorably. It began as a lawsuit brought by Robyn Morgan, an employee at an Iowa Taco Bell, against Sundance, a company that owns more than 150 Taco Bell franchises nationwide. Sundance, Inc. came in the order list from the justices’ private conference on Nov.
This week, we highlight petitions asking the court to consider, among other things, whether to overturn a ruling by the Montana Supreme Court that struck down a state law requiring minors under the age of 18 to get consent from their parents before obtaining an abortion. The parental-consent law never went into effect.
He relied on the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (known as the HEROES Act), a law passed in the wake of the Sept. 18 , asking the justices to allow the government to implement the program while litigation continues in the lower courts. Biden announced the program in August.
But the court’s decision could also have a legal impact well beyond this case, as the justices weigh issues such as when states can go to court to contest federal policies and how courts should interpret laws giving power to federal agencies. She relied on the HEROES Act , a law passed after the Sept. In a brief unsigned order on Dec.
Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, quoted from a Bloomberg Law article that the Biden administration “is on track to reverse the government’s position in more cases before the Supreme Court than the Justice Department did during the first full high court term of Donald Trump’s presidency.”
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. First, the court found that Exxon failed to show that federal common law justified removal, even if it might provide a defense.
Im talking about the former representative from Iowa who authored all kinds of political horror , instead. Griner was very public that she took action against King not primarily out of respect for copyright law, but because she rightly found King to be an abhorrent person and didnt want her or her son to be associated with his campaign.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content