This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The False Claims Act has for decades been the government’s primary anti-fraud statute. Under the FCA, a defendant is liable for submitting a false claim to the government for payment if it acted “knowingly,” which the statute defines as acting with actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, or reckless disregard.
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and reject a ruling observers said would gut the government’s primary anti-fraud statute. I mean, we do take these cases … to decide legal questions and not just to decide the particular case,” Alito said. At issue on Tuesday in two consolidated cases – U.S. SuperValu Inc.
In addition to disputing the rulings under the Fifth and 10th Amendments, the government argues that the individual plaintiffs do not have legal standing to challenge ICWA’s placement preferences for “other Indian families” and “Indian foster home[s].” In Cherokee Nation v. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. National Westminster Bank, PLC.
Including improper drug claims in the labeling of non-drug products can expose your company to liability from the FDA/FTC to consumer actions brought under state consumer protections statutes, class action lawsuits, etc. to legally sell hemp-derived products in the state. Several state requirements have only recently become effective.
As most radio stations don’t have individuals at their stations familiar with music licensing practices, it is difficult to imagine the small station in Ottumwa, Iowa or Elko, Nevada, or Dothan, Alabama each negotiating with all of the songwriter representatives.
My home state, Iowa, has disciplined an average of 68 attorneys (just under 1% of the number of practicing attorneys in the state) each year over the past decade. I’m an Iowa-based attorney and CPA. It dawned on me that I needed legal counsel for this legal proceeding. That is, not if you don’t allow it to become one.
Iowa and other states prohibit texting while driving but allow cellphone usage for other purposes, such as navigation. Iowa , police officers pulled Struve over after observing Struve using a cellphone – for an unidentifiable reason – for 10 seconds while driving. In Steven Struve’s case, Struve v. Lamoureux v.
Two pending petitions raise the question of the constitutionality of state statutes providing that corporations are deemed to have consented to “general” personal jurisdiction by virtue of having registered to do business in a state. was filed by a plaintiff seeking to enforce a similar registration statute. Animal Legal Defense Fund.
He argues that when a whistleblower invokes the act and claims he was fired because of his report, Section 1514A(b)(2)(C) of the act provides the claim is “governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code.” In his petition, Murray argues that the 2nd Circuit’s ruling was wrong. 14 and Apr.
Now, a new movement led by conservative state lawmakers is seeking to replace “Stand Your Ground” with an even broader legal defense for using deadly force. The trial judge didn’t bring it up, and no instructions were given to the jury at my trial regarding the relevance of the statute to my case. Frankly I doubt it.
In 2018, the Animal Legal Defense Fund – which, according to Kansas Gov. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit decision upholding a similar Iowa law concerning agricultural facilities. Animal Legal Defense Fund. Animal Legal Defense Fund. The case is Kelly v. Amwins Brokerage of Georgia, LLC. Issue : Whether Kan.
1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement v.
Children under 16 in Montana who seek an abortion, however, are required to notify their parents or legal guardian 48 hours before the procedure, unless they can obtain permission from a judge to bypass that requirement. Iowa Pork Producers Association v. 1101(a)(42). Jacobson v. Republican National Committee v. Missouri v.
Seven other states require a “good cause or special need” to carry a concealed gun in public under statutes like the New York law that are now at risk. Those states include Massachusetts, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Hawaii, and California.
We have seen student governments move to block speakers, fellow students, or groups at schools like the University of Illinois , Stanford , Iowa State , Skidmore College , Cornell , Harvard , and other schools. But in more ordinary times, ordinary legal practice and legal education can grapple with these issues.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. Renewable Fuels Association v.
The problem is that much in this investigation remains unknown and much of the analysis seems more visceral than legal. If Trump believed the material was declassified and relied on legal advice to resolve any disagreements, then prosecutors would combine an unprecedented legal case with a heavily contested factual record.
While at the same time officially turning the nation “into a legal oligarchy with a strongman presidency, a nearly bullet-proof immunity for the morbidly rich, and full personhood for corporations.” Similarly, other state constitutions may allow for the enactment of some, or even all, statutes based on the outcome of a popular vote.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content