SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 10, 2021

Andrus further argues that the Texas court’s decision conflicts with “vertical stare decisis,” the principle that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions. In 2018, the Animal Legal Defense Fund – which, according to Kansas Gov. Ineffective assistance of counsel. Intellectual disability and the death penalty.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Court Court Rules Legal 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

A Kansas law provides criminal penalties for trespassing at “animal facilities” with intent to damage the enterprise, and defines “trespass” to include entering the facility with the consent of the owners when gained by deception. According to the petitioner, Kansas Gov. It seems like the odds of a grant are good in one or both cases.

Statute 108

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 108

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2022

Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. To begin with the unhappy news (at least for petitioners), the court denied review without comment in one-time relist Kelly v.

Statute 83

Statute Stare Decisis Court Drafting 83