This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded Thursday that Kentucky may enforce price gouging laws against sellers on Amazon, overturning a district court preliminary injunction. ” Additionally, a second relevant statute in this case prohibits misleading trade conduct. .
Walker’s attorney, Tom Wine, argued that he was acting in self defense in accordance with Kentucky’s self-defense statute when he fired a single “warning shot,” striking Mattingly. This motion now permanently closes the case against Walker in the Kentucky judicial system.
In February, Paxton issued a non-binding legal opinion stating that transgender therapy for minor children constitutes child abuse. One such family contacted the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which took the case alongside Lambda Legal. The AG’s non-binding legal opinion was released on Feb. Omar Ochoa.
Critics say that and other provisions could harm homeowners struggling to make ends meet, and the legislation might force debtors to seek additional legal help on old bankruptcy cases they thought were closed. This blanket protection of a person’s home investment would rise to $250,000 if the bill passes.
Most of the rhetoric and activity has occurred in the first two categories in the US, so we focus there, in an effort to differentiate political narratives from legal reality. There are several statutes that form the basis of our antitrust laws. And what are the permissible boundaries of that behavior?
The legality of LD-15, which had an approximately 51.5% Because of the wrinkles of the court’s jurisdictional statutes, Garcia comes from the three-judge district court directly to the Supreme Court as an appeal over which the court has mandatory jurisdiction. Hispanic voting-age population, was subject to two different challenges.
Well-known examples of trade secrets include the recipe for Coca-Cola, Google’s search algorithm, the recipe for Kentucky Fried Chicken, the WD-40 formula, the recipe for McDonald’s secret sauce, Hershey’s chocolate-making process, and Procter & Gamble’s consumer research methods. In most cases, reverse engineering is legal.
To Judge Kethledge, that understanding of section 403 incorrectly applies “technical legal effect to a figure of speech” calling for ordinary meaning. Judge Griffin further noted that every other circuit that has considered the meaning of “a sentence” in the statute has come out differently than Jackson and Carpenter.
The Kentucky AG uniquely adds that FDA’s proposal improperly interferes with the Commonwealth’s exercise of supervisory authority over its physicians, including statutes addressed to obtaining informed consent. As a legal matter, they would need to first obtain supplemental approval from FDA granting them permission to do so.
Under the FCC’s proposals that are designed to clear up which entity is responsible for legal and regulatory compliance, such multicast streams will be part of the originating station’s license, not that of the “host” station. See the Federal Register notice, here , and read the comments submitted to the docket, here.
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky filed a complaint arguing that the law is unconstitutionally vague. Because of the procedural posture of the lawsuit, the court concluded that “the Statute must survive Planned Parenthood’s pre-enforcement, facial attack.” Writing for the majority, Circuit Judge Amy St.
In Cameron , the justices are considering whether the Kentucky attorney general can intervene to defend a state law restricting abortion after another state official declined to do so. Kentucky’s only abortion clinic went to federal district court in Kentucky, arguing that the law is unconstitutional, and both the district court and the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in denying the Kentucky attorney general’s motion to intervene on the commonwealth’s behalf in litigation concerning Kentucky House Bill 454, the state’s controversial abortion law. The post SCOTUS Rules Kentucky AG Can Defend Abortion Law appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
In a conversation with The Crime Report , Canon, a civil rights lawyer who teaches at the University of Louisville in Kentucky, discusses the class-based origins of the plea bargaining process, how bad prosecutors and poor defense attorneys further distorted the process, and why reforming it will be so difficult. Why does that matter? .
23-900 Issue: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. Kentucky ex rel. Dewberry Engineers, Inc. , relisted after the June 13 conference) Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v.
Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , Securities and Exchange Commission , 22-991 Issue : Whether, under special review statute 15 U.S.C. § That last case, United States v. CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. relisted after the June 22 conference) Jarkesy v. 21 and May 11 conferences) Clark v.
However, there are still some notable additions that raise more legal frights. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Kentucky v. Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge.
She insists in the video that she knows all of the governing legal rules and shows the path in detail. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Kentucky v. OUTCOME: Charges pending for murder.
The American Civil Liberties Union on Tuesday filed a class action lawsuit challenging two Kentucky abortion bans for violating the state’s constitutional right to privacy and self-determination. In February 2023, the Supreme Court of Kentucky declined a similar challenge to the abortion bans.
Facebook now petitions for review , supported by “friend of the court” briefs from law professors and former Securities and Exchange Commission officials , by the Chamber of Commerce and other industry groups , and by the Washington Legal Foundation. Kentucky ex rel. rescheduled before the Mar.
.: Through more than two years of litigation, the Secretary of Kentucky’s Cabinet for Health and Family Services led the state’s legal defense of its law prohibiting abortions in which an unborn child is dismembered while still alive. Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit refused to allow the Attorney General to defend Kentucky law.
The other potential blockbuster of the week, which involves a legal challenge to a Kentucky abortion law, appears likely to be resolved on procedural grounds in favor of the state’s Attorney General. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Cameron v. Thompson v.
Wade, o pponents of abortion are pushing for stricter bans at state levels—even criminalizing women who travel outside their states where abortion remains legal. So-called “trigger” laws have already gone into effect in states where anti-abortion statutes are already on the books have been activated by the decision. South Dakota.
Woods , 21-144 , involves a nonprofit ministry that operates a free legal-aid clinic. The clinic is overtly religious; in addition to legal issues, clinic staff discuss Jesus with clients and sometimes pray with them. Now back to the first petition: Cameron involved the Kentucky attorney general’s argument that the U.S.
Two principal federal antitrust statutes govern agreements among competitors: the Sherman Act of 1890, which prohibits monopolization and unlawful trade restraints, and the Clayton Act of 1914, which identifies additional prohibited conduct, including with respect to interlocking directorates, and mergers and acquisitions.
” She even posted a walk-through video and insisted that she knows all of the governing legal rules. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Kentucky v. OUTCOME: Charges pending for murder.
But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. A group of states brought suit in a federal district court in Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of the HISA and its funding mechanism. Relisted after the Jan. 10 conference.) 10 conference.)
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. Renewable Fuels Association v.
825 (1988), a Georgia statute “expressly referred” to an ERISA benefit plan. In finding that the state statute was preempted by ERISA, the Court stated that “[t]he state statute’s express reference to ERISA plans suffices to bring it within the federal law’s [preemptive] reach.” In Mackey v. Lanier , 486 U.S.
Biden) What its about: Talbott involves a legal challenge to President Donald Trumps Executive Order 14183, which banned transgender individuals from serving in the U.S. This case highlights the ongoing tension between state immigration laws and federal preemption, as well as the judiciarys role in navigating these complex legal issues.
Whether the Supreme Courts Loper Bright decision, which vests authority to interpret statutes more squarely in the courts and gives agencies less wiggle room to change interpretations over time, could perhaps result in this period of purgatory being less lengthy remains to be seen.
The Kentucky Republican makes it a rule to be RABT once a quarter, so as to preserve his status as a “maverick,” so he’s pointing out that the president imposing tariffs is not only stupid, but also completely contrary to the Constitution. But the legal reasoning applies equally to the sweeping excises levied yesterday.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content