JURIST

APRIL 22, 2022

Justice Brett Kavanaugh said: “[T]he fact that a North Dakota Law Firm, Boechler, P.C., The statute does not say that as to the 30-day deadline. Multiple justices commented that the government’s case could be undermined by the many plausible statutory interpretations of a 30-day deadline.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Court Statute Law Firm 104

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

a North Dakota law firm, of intent to levy on Boechler’s property to satisfy a tax penalty. It held instead that the statute is not jurisdictional, and that equitable tolling is an available argument in Tax Court. The statute provides for jurisdiction over “such matter,” but does not say what “such matter” is.

Statute 100

Statute Court Diligence Government 100

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2022

It will also add to the court’s precedent on the interaction between the law of equity and the technicalities of federal statutes. Partly because of the circuit split and partly because of the statute’s lack of clarity, this could be a close case. Circuit agreed with the firm’s approach in 2019 in Myers v.

Statute 109

Statute Law Firm Law Firms Government 109

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims and dismissed them without prejudice. North Dakota v.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40