This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A Stanford LawSchool study published today of regulatory reforms in Utah and Arizona finds that they are “spurring substantial innovation,” that they are critical to serving lower-income populations, and that they do not pose any substantial risk of consumer harm. Who will be served by those innovations?
In the blur of activity that was last week, I attended two legal tech conferences, plus an adjacent legal technology summit. After starting the week in New York at the glitzy celebration of big law tech that is Legalweek , and ending it in Charlotte, N.C., The justice gap extends well beyond low-income Americans.
With markedly increased remote interaction during the pandemic, legalservices consumers will expect similar connection to and engagement with law firms in 2021 and beyond. Managing the changing expectations of a redefined workforce and the changing expectations of legalservices consumers can seem overwhelming.
And we are in the midst right now of spending a three-part miniseries within the podcast of really looking in terms of what’s going on in the lawschools. We know that they are training the next generation in our profession and we know that these issues are becoming much more acutely aware in the environment. BREE: Right.
legal system. The LegalServices Corporation estimates that 92% of the civil legal problems of the roughly 50 million low-income Americans receive no or insufficient legal help. The other is the continuing lack of public access to the law. Two travesties persist in tainting access by all to the U.S.
A group of us were in the hotel bar, stridently debating whether an alternative business structure, licensed under Arizona’s liberalized legal regulatory scheme, could deliver legalservices in other states. Is there a trickle-down effect in legal tech? I think it does, at least sometimes.
On the positive side, the ChatGPT power may permit lawyers to produce documents and perhaps even legal research more efficiently, making legalservices for the underserved less expensive. And we have already seen efforts to have bots advise “clients” on run-of-the-mill legal representation issues in court.
With markedly increased remote interaction during the pandemic, legalservices consumers will expect similar connection to and engagement with law firms in 2021 and beyond. Managing the changing expectations of a redefined workforce and the changing expectations of legalservices consumers can seem overwhelming.
Mandatory and ongoing training assists in increasing competency, use, and comfort. Technology Training. Ideally, this begins at the lawschool level, but even after graduation technology is ever-morphing, requiring continual education. Technology training availability varies widely based on firm size.
Target customer: Small and medium law firms, nonprofit immigration legal departments and lawschool clinics. Our customers consist of nonprofit legal departments, small and medium law firms, local government agencies, and lawschool clinics. Pricing: Subscription. Fourth Party.
Target customer: Small and medium law firms, nonprofit immigration legal departments and lawschool clinics. Our customers consist of nonprofit legal departments, small and medium law firms, local government agencies, and lawschool clinics. Pricing: Subscription. Fourth Party.
From Reuters : A fourth major law U.S. law firm, Milbank , struck a deal on Wednesday with Donald Trump amid the U.S. president’s campaign against perceived enemies within the legal industry, while another law firm fought back in court against an executive order targeting its business.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content