JURIST
DECEMBER 6, 2022
Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015). Members of the Court’s current conservative supermajority, though, have expressed support for the theory over the years.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 13, 2024
Cosmas Emeziem, JSD Cornell University, Drinan Fellow and Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Boston College Law School, Newton, MA. It has anchorage on doctrines such as stare decisis and precedents. ©Author 2024. Thus, quality judicial deliberations and decisions reflect institutional competence.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Above The Law
JANUARY 24, 2025
Michael Dreeben, another solicitor general’s office veteran, is listed as Prelogar’s co-instructor.
The Crime Report
APRIL 8, 2022
TCR: When did the guiding philosophy of our criminal justice system connect to the concept of stare decisis, which obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case? DC: The law exists to protect capital.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 6, 2021
Since about the time these lawyers were born, the days were waning when the Constitution was only for men; we attended law school when, for the first time in history, female students began to equal the number of male students. And no, Justice Kavanaugh, the Constitution is not “neutral” about women’s rights.
The Crime Report
NOVEMBER 19, 2021
When Berkeley Law School Dean and constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky taught Criminal Procedure in the Fall of 2019, he became frustrated when he realized many of the cases that were the subject of his lectures ended with the police winning and the rights of suspects losing. Or does stare decisis make it stuck as a precedent?
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Indeed, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a critic of Roe , seeing it as too sweeping in supplanting state laws. To uphold Roe , the court likely will require more than the usual arguments of stare decisis , the doctrine that the court should generally stand by its precedents.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
197 
Let's personalize your content