This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
NewHampshire’s Alimony Law Recently Changed; Will It Change Again? T he general test when deciding whether alimony is appropriate in a NewHampshire case is whether there is a need for alimony and an ability to pay. Under the newlaw, the length of a term alimony order was also defined.
Finally, it is important to note that the State of Michigan has adopted a statute that clearly spells out when its courts should and should not give effect to choice-of-court clauses. states—Nebraska, NewHampshire, and North Dakota—have adopted similar statutes based on the Model Choice of Forum Act. This is unusual.
December 1 is also the deadline for noncommercial ownership reports to be filed by noncommercial radio stations in Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, Maine, NewHampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont , and noncommercial television stations in Colorado, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota (see our Advisory here ).
” The language of the statute in my view is unconstitutional due to its sweeping criminalization of any “curse or abuse” that could “provoke a breach of the peace.” ” However, the appellate panel corrected noted that such laws are narrowly construed in light of controlling precedent.
NewHampshire , the Supreme Court followed a “two-tied approach” that allowed for restrictions in certain defined areas like fighting words and obscenity. On the one hand, certain forms of speech, or speech in certain contexts, has been considered outside the scope of constitutional protection. In Chaplinsky v.
Following a slew of recent cases scuttling or hamstringing new oil and gas pipelines, some have commented that it may now be even harder to develop transmission capacity for renewable energy. In contrast to the natural gas permitting scheme, no federal law provides a specific approval process for siting oil pipelines.
In the spring of 2015, an experienced nurse started work in the forensic unit of the NewHampshire State Prison for Men. She was in fact the victim of a series of statutes and administrative rules in NewHampshire that departed from constitutional protections, civil rights, evidence-based practice, and dignity.
The Vermont Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new state law prohibiting high-capacity magazines, affirming the validity of the state’s first major gun-control law. The law also sets limits for magazine sizes at 15 rounds for handguns and 10 rounds for long guns.
A new case on public funding and religious education. The parents cite Cardigan Mountain School, a private boys’ school in NewHampshire attended by the son of Chief Justice John Roberts, as an example of a “nominally religious” school that was approved to participate in the program.). Gallardo v. United States v.
Fred Stone, a Maine farmer who saw his livelihood destroyed and became crippled by debt due to the discovery of so-called forever chemicals on his dairy farm five years ago, helped inspire a law, signed last month by Gov.
Grimm , leaves in place a lower-court ruling that found that a Virginia school district violated federal law when it barred students from using the restrooms that align with their gender identities. citizen to receive a benefit under state law. In one case, NewHampshire v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content