This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A newly revised NorthCarolina juvenile justice law will take effect Sunday, aiming to address gaps in handling serious offenses by minors. The new law also includes provisions for flexibility. This principle is rooted in the 1983 NorthCarolina Supreme Court decision State v.
The NorthCarolina Supreme Court issued an order on Friday in the election protest raised by state Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin. ” The majority opinion cites NC statute 163-230.1 (‘Simultaneous issuance of absentee ballots with application’) in its decision.
A federal judge in NorthCarolina found on Tuesday that the state’s 147-year-old voting law is unconstitutional. The lawsuit arose when civil rights group NorthCarolina A. The lawsuit arose when civil rights group NorthCarolina A. Executive Director of the NorthCarolina A.
The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from NorthCarolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. The challenged statute, N.C. NorthCarolina’s writ of certiorari focused on three arguments.
NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP that two Republican state legislators may step in to defend the state’s voter identification law, even though the state’s Democratic attorney general is already doing so. The US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 Thursday in Berger v.
The NorthCarolina Supreme Court Friday granted a petition for rehearing for two settled cases. The order granting the petition for rehearing relied on NorthCarolina Rule of Appellate Procedure 31 , which allows rehearings of decisions if a court overlooks or misapprehends a point of fact or law.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether two groups of NorthCarolina employees were denied pay or benefits by the state in violation of a federal employment law and the Constitution. The NorthCarolina Supreme Court ruled for the employees.
NorthCarolina legislators asks justices to hear independent-state-legislature theory on the merits. In this case, the NorthCarolina General Assembly last November enacted a new map for congressional elections in response to the 2020 U.S. On remand, the NorthCarolina Superior Court on Feb. In Moore v.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a NorthCarolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
ABC News ] * NorthCarolina sued over its electronic court filing system. Law360 ] * Of the previous 100 anti-LGBTQ+ statutes passed, half of them were this year. appeared first on Above the Law. Or so the shadowy government conspiracy would have us believe. It's like the Dominion case but more charming. [
A small group of bankruptcy judges in six of the 90-odd judicial districts nationwide, backed by their senators (in Alabama and NorthCarolina) managed to have their districts excluded from the U.S. When the program succeeded, it was made permanent and extended nationwide. Well, not quite. Trustee Program.
Fitzgerald , unanimously agreeing on Monday that a statute that imposes higher fees on bankruptcy filers in 48 states than in the other two states is so far from “uniform” that it transgresses the Constitution’s requirement that Congress provide “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.”.
For historical reasons involving politics at the time of the Bankruptcy Code’s enactment, six districts in Alabama and NorthCarolina do not participate in that system; they are administered by the Bankruptcy Administrator Program in the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. By statute, the U.S.
2023) involves a set of thirteen different professional models whose images were allegedly used without their permission to advertise for the Capital Cabaret, a strip club halfway between Raleigh & Durham, NorthCarolina. state law: Section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. common law right of privacy – misappropriation.
On March 7, the justices denied two emergency appeals on the shadow docket to revive the new congressional maps drawn by Republican state legislators in Pennsylvania as well as in NorthCarolina. soil by federal law-enforcement officers performing traditional law-enforcement duties. Carter , former Rep. In 2 U.S.C. §
The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. A noncitizen who does not attend a removal proceeding can be ordered removed as long as written notice has been provided to him under the statute. Tori Madden) The question before the justices on Jan.
This year the long conference yielded 12 new grants, on topics ranging from controversial laws seeking to regulate social media companies ( covered in a separate story ) to property rights and bankruptcy fees. The cases granted on Friday will likely be argued in January or February 2024, with a decision to follow by summer. Supreme Court.
Paul Gugliuzza is Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Jonas Anderson is Associate Dean for Scholarship and Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law. Guest post by Paul Gugliuzza and Jonas Anderson.
Nearly every state allows federal courts to certify questions of state law to obtain definitive answers from state supreme courts on unsettled issues of state law. All states, except NorthCarolina, have rules or statutes allowing their highest court to accept certified questions from federal courts on questions of state law.
The question presented was whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the U.S. state whose law is displaced. LLC (Raiders) is a company organized under the laws of Pennsylvania.
Researchers at the Quattrone Center, based at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, created what they said was a unique dataset of 4,644 opinions in which allegations of misconduct were raised in the more than 1.5 million judicial opinions published between 2000 and 2016 by federal and state courts in Pennsylvania.
We recently discussed the case of University of NorthCarolinalaw student Sagar Sharma, a student of color, who faced a recall election as the first-year class co-president. The charges are connected to the prior controversy and raise serious free speech and retaliatory concerns at the law school. .
Governors, state cannabis regulators, law enforcement groups and local governments weighed in, as did marijuana advocates and opponents, marijuana industry associations, Members of Congress, federal law enforcement groups, healthcare and human rights groups, unions and trade associations, and private individuals. 21 U.S.C. §
If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems? This is not to say that 2021 was without innovation.
The state’s legislature passed the voter-ID law at the center of the case in December 2018. The law requires voters to provide photo identification to cast a ballot and instructs county election boards to provide ID cards at no cost to voters. The attorney general is defending the law and arguing that it is constitutional.
If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems? This is not to say that 2021 was without innovation.
NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP addresses the ability of NorthCarolina legislators to defend the state’s voter-ID law from lawsuits under the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. The Federal Circuit rejected George’s argument on the ground that the VA had applied the law in existence at the time.
Last November, the NorthCarolina legislature enacted a new map for congressional elections in response to the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court to stay the NorthCarolina Supreme Court’s order invalidating the legislature’s map and to stay the state trial court’s order adopting the replacement map. In Moore v. Census data.
Ferguson involves a First Amendment challenge to Washington state’s law prohibiting “conversion therapy,” the practice of seeking to change a gay or transgender person’s sexual orientation or gender identity through counseling. and NorthCarolina Farm Bureau Federation v. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit rejected that claim.
The thirty-seventh annual survey on choice of law in the American courts is now available on SSRN. Choice of Law The Eighth Circuit applied Mexican law to a suit against General Motors over a car crash in Mexico, while an Ohio state court applied South African law to invalidate a marriage. In Bartlett v.
A tragedy in NorthCarolina could present rather difficult torts questions in a wrongful death case for a grieving family. While I am not a NorthCarolina lawyer, the state does not appear ideal for plaintiffs in this type of action and the facts of the case could present other difficulties. Disclaimer.
I would like to prevail on him to go one more term and have some symmetry by sketching the Harvard and University of NorthCarolina affirmative-action cases, but it seems that his mind is made up. The question is whether a 1987 federal statute subjects certain Indian tribes in Texas to that state’s entire body of gambling law.
The injuries in Clendening were not the sort of combat-related or even job-related injuries one would expect: petitioner Carol Clendening seeks to recover for her late husband’s exposure to toxic drinking water while serving as a judge advocate general officer at Camp Lejeune, NorthCarolina. territories. 28 and Oct. 7 conferences).
The trial penalty that coaxes both the guilty and innocent to enter pleas is exacerbated by mandatory minimum statutes, which trigger automatic penalties if invoked by the prosecutor, as well as sentencing enhancements within the discretion of the prosecutor, such as whether to file notice with the court of a prior offense.
University of NorthCarolina, which are poised to determine the role of affirmative action in college admissions. Another provision of the statute, however, also allows inmates to collaterally challenge their convictions outside this process through a traditional habeas action under 28 U.S.C. Harvard College and SFFA v.
Texas authorities say they have the right to keep it under civil forfeiture statutes. Disobeying commands during a law enforcement encounter can lead to arrest or worse. Using a law enforcement procedure called civil forfeiture, Harris County seized the money and is attempting to keep it permanently. Jaba Tsitsuashvili.
who committed a criminal offense when they were minors may be subject to differing age-based restrictions on their access to firearms depending on the nature and severity of their juvenile offense; their age at the time of the offense; their state’s laws regarding firearm eligibility, and expungement of juvenile records. Adults in the U.S.
We still believe that no one is above the law — including those who are rich, famous and powerful.”. Moreover, Steele is right, “no one is above the law” including prosecutors who are not allowed to pursue convictions at any cost in popular high-profile cases. It must be done under common law, which is challenging.
In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, NorthCarolina. Note: Chapter 49, Section 8 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. Code Ann. § 26-26-115(b). The trial court ruled that “Dr.
Morrissey-Berru , under which employees deemed “ministers” of religious institutions are not covered by various employment and discrimination laws. In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” Next up is Texas v. 10 and Jan.
Yet it left the door open for states to implement or reform their own laws – and some chose to preserve capital punishment. Some states, such as Louisiana and NorthCarolina, enacted mandatory death penalty statutes, eliminating discretion entirely from the death penalty system. The Furman Framework. Austin Sarat.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Wednesday upheld a lower court’s decision to strike down NorthCarolina’s statewide abortion restrictions. For the past 140 years, NorthCarolina has criminalized the “procurement or administration of abortion as a felony.”
Harper , a dispute arising from the NorthCarolina legislature’s efforts to draw a new congressional map in response to the 2020 census. Harper , a dispute arising from the NorthCarolina legislature’s efforts to draw a new congressional map in response to the 2020 census. 303 Creative and Moore v. United States (Nov.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content