This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed Tuesday a $465 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for public nuisance through its prescription opioid marketing campaign in the state. The Court applies the nuisance statutes to unlawful conduct that annoys, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, or safety of others.
* Laws matter: life lost after school neglects to follow anti-bullying protocol. The EU's laws will be impacting American free speech, eh? Talk about long-arm statutes. [ Oklahoma just passed their version of Texas's Roe sidestep. appeared first on Above the Law. The Hill ]. NBC News ]. Sorry, not sorry. [
Share At the last Supreme Court oral argument of Justice Stephen Breyer’s career, the court stepped into a dispute over the state of Oklahoma’s criminal jurisdiction authority in Indian country. Oklahoma v. Oklahoma , which reaffirmed that the reservation of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation within Oklahoma remains “Indian country.”
If the courts of Puerto Rico are properly classified as federal under our case law, it defies the imagination to think administrative tribunals hatched by the Department of the Interior could be treated differently,” Gorsuch wrote. Justices heard arguments in Oklahoma v. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the dissent.
Hetronic sued Abitron in the Western District of Oklahoma for trademark violations under two related provisions of the Lanham Act, both of which prohibit the unauthorized use in commerce of protected marks when that use is likely to cause confusion.
Custodia Legis, the Law Librarians of Congress , offers webinars on legal research issues as part of its Orientation of Law Library Collections. For those interested in Oklahomalaw, the Orientation to the Law Library Collections will be presented by the Oklahoma State Law Library staff.
By statute, one factor that can support a continuance for the “ends of justice” occurs when “the failure to grant such a continuance in the proceeding would be likely to make a continuation of such proceeding impossible.” City of Edmond, Oklahoma v. In his petition , Gottesfeld maintains that the circuits are split on this question.
By Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Presumably, this acronym is meant to suggest that these are new types of designs, uncontemplated by Congress when it passed statutes that—according to some—are in need of “modernization.”. For prior PatentlyO coverage, see here.) In Feist v.
Michael Kimberly, arguing for Denezpi, opened by stating that the law-making and law-enforcing aspects of sovereignty are equally important to determining whether expressions of sovereign power are separate. Justice Samuel Alito, in a series of questions reminiscent of concerns he raised in oral argument in McGirt v.
Photo credit: GRIDArendal on Visualhunt Antitrust – a previously dormant area of law and federal enforcement – has reached a new zenith in recent years. Antitrust law defines guardrails to address boycotts led by corporations. What is a Boycott, according to antitrust law? What actions, and what changes, are inspired?
Notwithstanding the extension, licensees should not wait until the last minute to upload documents, as there may still be residual issues with the system for some time.
A group of civil rights organizations filed suit on Tuesday challenging Oklahoma HB 1775 , which prevents public schools from requiring students to learn about critical race theory and gender discrimination. The complaint characterizes the law as a suppression of free speech and suppression of the exchange of ideas.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court Wednesday struck down two abortion bans as unconstitutional, but abortion remains illegal in the state. ” Because both statutes require a “medical emergency” for a physician to legally perform an abortion, the court found them unconstitutional.
New York’s Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a bill to repeal a largely unused law from 1907 that made adultery a criminal offense. If signed, the adultery statute will be immediately repealed. Senate Bill S8744 repeals New York Penal Law Section 255.17. Several states have laws criminalizing adultery.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. Baltimore and Incinerator Operator Settled Lawsuit over Local Air Law. Oil pump, ( Creative Commons ). By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Civil rights groups filed a complaint on Thursday against Iowa state officials to stop the state’s recently enacted immigration law from going into effect on July 1. The law makes it a crime for a foreign national to enter Iowa after having been deported from the US in the past, regardless of current immigration status.
that the Lanham Act, the federal trademark statute, reaches only conduct “where the claimed infringing use in commerce is domestic” and that confusion to consumers in the United States is not relevant to the analysis. Even though Abitron largely made sales in Europe, Hetronic sued on its home turf, the Western District of Oklahoma.
Morrissey-Berru , under which employees deemed “ministers” of religious institutions are not covered by various employment and discrimination laws. In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” Next up is Texas v.
Share On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will consider whether federal trademark law applies to trademark infringement that takes place outside the United States. The facts Hetronic, based in Oklahoma, manufactures and sells radio remote controls that operate heavy-duty construction equipment. In Abitron Austria GmbH v. It owns U.S.
Hendrix turns on the interpretation of the federal habeas statute, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. The statute replaced the habeas remedy with the motion to vacate, unless the “remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [the prisoner’s] detention.”
Circuit upheld the regulation, holding that “the disputed rule is consistent with the best interpretation of ‘machine gun’ under the governing statutes.” In Cargill , the en banc U.S. ” (relisted after the Sept. 13 and Oct 27 conferences) Tingley v. relisted after the Sept. 13 and Oct 27 conferences) 74 Pinehurst LLC v.
Ferguson involves a First Amendment challenge to Washington state’s law prohibiting “conversion therapy,” the practice of seeking to change a gay or transgender person’s sexual orientation or gender identity through counseling. A federal district court in North Carolina ultimately invalidated much of the law, and the U.S.
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday filed a lawsuit challenging a highly controversial Texas law, Senate Bill (SB8) , which bans all abortions after six weeks and authorizes citizens to report individuals who assist or intend to assist people seeking to terminate their pregnancies.
But the law caught the attention of a number of states and industry players, which have been fighting it in court ever since. Although the FTC formally publishes the authority’s rules, unless those rules violated the 2020 law or another FTC regulation, however, it was unable to override them. In Oklahoma v.
Separately, federal law also permits tribes to negotiate their contracts with the IHS to allow the tribe to bill its members’ insurance (whether private insurance, federal Medicare or Medicaid, workers’ compensation, or some other kind) for the services provided. And in 2023, a divided panel of the U.S. United States , Thomas v. 3 and Nov.
The most controversial provisions of that statute, addressed in Ysleta , are the provisions that govern the tribes’ subjection to Texas gambling regulations. Conversely, the second provision “insists that the statute does not grant Texas civil or criminal regulatory jurisdiction with respect to … gaming.”.
After a dispute over the trademarks for remote controls used to operate heavy construction equipment, a jury awarded Oklahoma-based Hetronic International, Inc. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has deviated from that by holding that enablement is a question of law that courts review without deference. trademarks.
Oklahoma last term, the court confronted the complex past of Oklahoma’s Native nations, Chehalis turns on the unique legal history of Alaskan Natives. Consequently, when Alaska became a state in 1959 and when, soon thereafter, oil was discovered in Prudhoe Bay, federal law left open many questions — especially land ownership.
The court did not find either situation to be the case because “[t]he statute does not prevent medical providers from treating children with gender dysphoria with [alternative treatments], nor does it prohibit them from providing those medical procedures to adults.”
The state of Oklahoma put James Coddington to death on Aug. It marks the beginning of a busy period at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary’s execution chamber. Photo courtesy Oklahoma Dept. Today, fewer jurisdictions are using the death penalty, but some – like Oklahoma – seem to be doubling down. James Coddingon.
It explicitly separates the concept of “sex” from “gender identity,” stating that the latter, along with similar subjective terms, cannot be used interchangeably with or as substitutes for “sex” in legal statutes. At the time of HRC’s 2023 report, over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ laws had been introduced in the US.
Below is my column in the Wall Street Journal on the ongoing opioid litigation and an important ruling out of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. ” The Oklahoma Supreme Court last week struck down a $465 million opioid award against Johnson & Johnson based on a legal theory that has previously been tried and failed against guns.
Today, 44 states and the District of Columbia have laws aiming to protect fetal development from drugs or alcohol. The law can require forced addiction treatment for the duration of pregnancy. But every leading medical association that considered these laws has condemned a punitive approach, saying it harms more than it helps.
At issue in Oklahoma v. In the decision below, the 10th Circuit held that challenges to the disapprovals of Oklahoma’s and Utah’s plans can only be brought in the D.C. The same law is at the center of Environmental Protection Agency v. And the justices have allowed one relist from last term to hang around over the summer.
Oklahoma cases as a single case — that I have to be extremely summary. The case also presents the question whether a public-accommodation law that authorizes secular but not religious exemptions is generally applicable under Employment Division v. The state has designated Oklahoma v. It’s like the long conference in January.
Facebook now petitions for review , supported by “friend of the court” briefs from law professors and former Securities and Exchange Commission officials , by the Chamber of Commerce and other industry groups , and by the Washington Legal Foundation. Oklahoma ,” which is now being briefed for argument in the fall. We’ll know more soon.
So-called “trigger” laws have already gone into effect in states where anti-abortion statutes are already on the books have been activated by the decision. Below is an updating guide to states with now-active legislation or trigger laws banning or criminalizing abortion. Law : Alabama HB314 2019. Washington Gov.
Yes, the statute really does have a full cite to the opinion in it. The California state law at issue in Flagstar Bank v. Kivett , and the New York state law in Cantero v. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that the California law requiring escrow interest was not preempted by the National Bank Act.
The Oklahoma charter school board that approved the Catholic schools application tells the justices that a state supreme court ruling invalidating its contract with the school violates the Constitution and harms lower-income families. Isidore is a public school and therefore required under the state charter-school law to be non-sectarian.
The states also allege that suits involving the interstate effects of pollution are exclusively governed by federal common law and belong in federal court to avoid the risk of inconsistent judgments. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) (Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan.
Utley professor of health law at Boston University School of Public Health and professor of law at Boston University School of Law. “[T]he This minimal test requires government action to have a legitimate purpose and the law in question to be rationally related to that purpose. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Since 2021, more than 30 rules, guidelines, boycotts and laws have been passed by various states to thwart ESG goals and bolster industries such as fossil fuels and firearms. In finding the two laws were preempted by existing federal law, the court highlighted the broad preemption clause contained within ERISA.
In 2017, Congress passed a tax law that allowed taxpayers to deduct from federal income taxation only up to $10,000 of state and local taxes. Then-President Donald Trump described the 2017 law as an “incentive” for taxpayers “to say, hey, make sure that your politicians do a good job of running your state.” New York v.
But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. They argued that the law was unconstitutional because it delegated federal power to a private company a concept known as the private nondelegation doctrine. history.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content