This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The court turns to sovereign immunity on Wednesday when it hears argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. The case involves the board Congress created in response to PuertoRico’s dire financial distress in 2016. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
Gorsuch drew a comparison between the federally funded and administered CFR courts and the courts of PuertoRico. “If In January, Amanda White Eagle of the American Indian Sovereignty Project filed an Amici Curiae brief on behalf of a collective of federal Indian law scholars and historians. Understanding American Indian Policy.
De George , the Supreme Court held that the term “crime involving moral turpitude” in federal immigration law is not unconstitutionally vague. He became a lawful permanent resident after marrying a U.S. Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.
Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. 223, 228 (1989), a statute does not abrogate sovereign immunity unless Congress’s intent to abrogate is “unmistakably clear” in the statutory text. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.: Under Dellmuth v. Muth , 491 U.S.
In the years that followed, the State Department had conversations with the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) about how COCA should be implemented. The ULC is a non-partisan, non-profit, unincorporated association comprised of volunteer attorneys appointed by each state of the United States plus the District of Columbia, PuertoRico, and the U.S.
The source of authority for the laws defining the offenses in question were separate – tribal and federal – exercises of distinct sovereigns; therefore, Merle Denezpi’s federal prosecution did not violate his right not to be twice in jeopardy for “the same offense.”. Wheeler and, more recently, PuertoRico v.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday probed Congress’ authority to deny welfare benefits to PuertoRico and other U.S. Residents of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands can qualify for the program, but residents of PuertoRico and the other territories are excluded. government.
The Lacey Act and other federal wildlife statutes could be charged for such conduct. The Lacey Act makes it a federal crime to break the wildlife laws of any state, tribe, or foreign country, in interstate commerce. Under the common law, there is strict liability for injuries caused by wild animals in your possession.
Share Wednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. The Financial Oversight and Management Board is an entity created under a 2016 federal statute ( PROMESA ) to take control of and restructure the finances of PuertoRico. At bottom, the case is a public-records dispute.
On November 22, 2022, sixteen municipalities of PuertoRico filed a lawsuit in the federal district court in PuertoRico seeking to hold coal, oil, and gas companies liable for losses resulting from storms during the 2017 hurricane season and ongoing economic losses since that time. In Municipalities of PuertoRico v.
People born in the other territories — Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, PuertoRico, and the U.S. Fitisemanu and the Tulis argue that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, embraced the founding-era common-law understanding of birthright citizenship. citizenship. territories. 28 and Oct. 7 conferences).
Many people remember the controversial “Stand Your Ground” law , passed in Florida in 2005, that allowed George Zimmerman to walk free after he stalked and killed Trayvon Martin. That law permits a person to use deadly force if they “reasonably believe physical or deadly force was necessary to protect him or herself.”
The ACA defines “cost-sharing” to include “deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or similar charges” and “any other expenditure required of an insured individual…” The statute sets an annual cap on the “expenditure[s] required of an insured individual” by their health insurance plan.
Share Jose Luis Vaello-Madero is an American citizen who was born in PuertoRico. But when he moved back to PuertoRico to be closer to his family, Vaello-Madero lost his SSI benefits because, by law, PuertoRico residents are excluded from the program. The case, United States v. territories.
Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent in the Baltimore case. Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent. Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent.
The case involves a Mississippi law that prohibits abortion, with limited exceptions, after 15 weeks’ gestation. California has applied its travel ban to Texas and 10 other states that have similar laws. Next up are two election-law cases. The petitions in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar , 20-542 , and Scarnati v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content