This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In my torts class, we discuss the often uncertain line between ordinary citizens and public figures. This week, the SouthCarolina Supreme Court handed down a major ruling in Cruce v. I have previously written about the continuing questions over the inclusion of the public figures with public officials in tort actions.
Good thing that there was a law librarian nearby who could witness her acrobatics and then blog at out it to the world. As it turns out, SouthCarolina, where Young Lady happened to trip and tear up her knees, has it's own Torts Claim Act called, not surprisingly, the SouthCarolinaTort Claims Act under § 15-78-10.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. The next scary moment is likely to be in the form of a torts complaint.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. However, my students and I often discuss the remarkably wide range of torts that comes with All Hallow’s Eve.
A terrible tragedy has befallen the University of SouthCarolina after sophomore Nicholas Anthony Donofrio , 20, was shot and killed on the front porch of a house in Columbia. It is an all-too-familiar pattern that we often discuss in my torts class where people are confused and try to enter the wrong home.
Swalwell is a lawyer with a degree from the University of Maryland Law School. The tweet came in response to SouthCarolina GOP Sen. Nebraska (1925), the Court struck down a state law prohibiting instruction in German. American torts have long required consent in torts. Indeed, in Meyer v. Spence , 464 F.2d
The court also declined without comment to take up two other petitions , seeking review of a ruling by a federal appeals court that invalidated on First Amendment grounds a North Carolinalaw that allows employers to sue employees who make undercover video or audio recordings. SouthCarolina sought Supreme Court review in May 2022.
Black churches feeling like they are going to get shot up, like at a Bible study that’s happened in SouthCarolina. The most obvious form of civil liability would be some type of tort action. The civil liability could come in the form of agency actions by the FCC against Fox, but that would not include a member of Congress.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. However, my students and I often discuss the remarkably wide range of torts that comes with All Hallow’s Eve. In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. First, the court found that Exxon failed to show that federal common law justified removal, even if it might provide a defense. and non-U.S. Reynolds v. State , No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content