Laws Stare Decisis Technology 
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 23, 2021
It has been accused of infringing patented technology invented by the company’s founder and wants to avoid liability for patent infringement. Wolf principally argued that stare decisis justifies maintaining the doctrine. The post Doctrinal “dinosaur” or stare decisis? Justices wrestle with patent-law precedent.
Patently O
JULY 24, 2024
Latty Distinguished Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law In a flurry of recent decisions, the Supreme Court has continued its skepticism of administrative agencies. Consider first stare decisis and the Court’s overruling of Chevron deference (i.e.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
JULY 14, 2024
The Supreme Court directly revisited the rule in Kimble, but ultimately chose to uphold the rule based on stare decisis. Insall centered around a series of agreements between Zimmer and Dr. John Insall related to knee replacement technology. Read the Decision: Zimmer v. Insall The dispute in Zimmer v.
Patently O
JULY 6, 2022
He was doing some amateurs woodworking when he conceived of his SawStop technology. The Supreme Court in Bilski addressed this issue to some degree in the context of the non-statutory categorical bars of abstract ideas; laws of nature and natural phenomenon. My middle school shop teacher was missing fingers courtesy of a table saw.
Patently O
OCTOBER 4, 2021
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Issue Preclusion (collateral estoppel) prevents a party from re-litigating an issue of fact or law that was already determined in a prior case. by Dennis Crouch. Patreon, Inc. 20-1394 (Supreme Court 2021). This is a core civil procedure case pending before the Supreme Court. Brief in opposition ].
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Pro-life advocates argue laws like Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act , a 15-week abortion limit, are clearly constitutional. abortion law, which currently allows unlimited abortion up to birth under Roe v. The abortion providers’ case relies heavily on stare decisis. Law professor Helen Alvaré et al.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 1, 2021
But today, the only attendees will be the three arguing lawyers (and their second chairs), essential court personnel, most if not all of the justices’ law clerks, two spouses of justices, three sketch artists, and 18 news correspondents. They’ve poisoned the law. And in due time, the justices themselves.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content