Laws Stare Decisis Texas 
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Share Mary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. On Monday, the court was confronted with an emergency application from Texas abortion providers seeking to prevent that state from functionally banning abortions in the state. Wade to the Present.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 20, 2022
Texas , involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit upholding a similar Iowa law. By contrast, the petition in Mallory v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 11, 2022
In addition, the Supreme Court held a few years back that the appointment procedures for SEC administrative law judges violate the Constitution’s appointments clause. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. relisted after the April 29 conference).
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 2, 2022
The landowners note that in 2009, picking up on the court’s changing case law, the U.S. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is not jurisdictional.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 27, 2022
By contrast, the Maryland Court of Appeals held that Baltimore’s similar tax was constitutionally permissible, concluding that the law did not single out the press and was therefore subject to only the lowest form of constitutional scrutiny: rational basis review. Texas , 21-6001. Cincinnati seeks review in City of Cincinnati, Ohio v.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 10, 2021
Texas , a capital defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. On remand, the Texas court ruled that the inadequate counsel had not prejudiced Andrus. Texas , Andrus maintains that the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting the prejudice analysis.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 30, 2022
Ross , involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. Case in point: Texas v. Texas , a capital case from the Lone Star State.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
117 
Let's personalize your content