This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For those lawyers that do use litigation support/e-discovery software, 31.5% stated they preferred an “all-in-one solution” for e-discovery review, which was described as “including sophisticated tools to assist in your processing, production, analytics, and review.” How often is an e-discovery tool necessary?
JURIST EXCLUSIVE – One of our law student correspondents in Myanmar sends this update on the latest arrests of protestors and dissidents opposed to the new military government that seized power in the country in the February 1 coup : Right now, they’re targeting the lawyers. U Lin Nyo Tar Yar (South Oakkalapa, Yangon).
Another important tool in the litigator’s toolbox is TechnologyAssistedReview (TAR). This is a broad term referring to the application of technology in a traditional litigation document review. TAR applications can deal with high volumes of data without increasing headcount. Document Review Tools.
For more than 10 years, ACEDS has trained lawyers, paralegals and other legal support professionals at law firms, corporate legal departments, the government, and in academia. It was founded in 2010 by some enterprising lawyers and legal support personnel. There have been huge strides made there with technology-assistedreview.
Similarly, Epiqs launch of Epiq AI Labs and its AI Discovery Assistant earlier this year evinces a clear move toward foundational AI infrastructure, not just a simple point solution. The tool is designed to automate over 80% of review processes and complete them up to 90% faster than TAR.
Lawyers can be a tough crowd. Especially when it comes to technology, many lawyers are reluctant to put their confidence in workflows and solutions that seem to operate in a black box. These results make AI much more tangible for skeptical lawyers who have yet to utilize predictive coding or other analytics in a meaningful way.
Legal teams have long used AI for e-discovery in the form of Technology-AssistedReview (TAR) and Continuous Active Learning (CAL). These technologies are leveraged for use cases like auto-coding documents, concept clustering, and near-duplicate identification.
This could include things like automating administrative tasks so lawyers can focus on higher value work, using contract attorneys to support an in-house department with a large regulatory project, and data mapping to uncover where untapped business intelligence resides. The Survival of the (Technologically) Fittest.
However, despite much of the hype surrounding the dangers of generative AI and its potential negative impact on the legal industry, the reality is that, as in-house lawyers, we are only poised to gain. While there is a vast array of AI tools on the market, not all are made equal.
The defendants—two of whom acknowledged they had attempted to shut down tar sands crude oil pipelines by turning shut-off valves on the pipelines—were charged with criminal damage to property of critical public facilities, utilities, and pipelines; trespass on such facilities; and/or aiding and abetting criminal damage to property and/or trespass.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content