This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday gave a Maryland prison official another chance to defend himself against a federal civil rights claim. Younger rested on procedural issues, but it was an important one for the litigants involved – and, as Justice Amy Coney Barrett observed in announcing it, for law professors.
appeals court on Tuesday declared that Maryland’s licensing requirements for people seeking to buy handguns were unconstitutional, Nate Raymond reports for Reuters. The NRA backed the lawsuit that challenged the law and covered the legal costs of the litigation.
Share Kevin Younger was detained before trial at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. In the district court, Dupree argued that Younger’s suit could not go forward because he had not pursued all remedies, including internal grievance remedies at the prison, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
United States (April 21) Whether a litigant who files a notice of appeal after the time to do so has expired must file a second notice when the time to appeal is reopened. EPA (April 23) Whether fuel producers have a legal right to challenge a waiver, given to California, of the general bar on the adoption of emissions standards by states.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether a prison official appealing a jury verdict against him can raise a purely legal defense not implicated in the trial. The post In Maryland prison-assault case, a request to clarify an important procedural question appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
In 2015, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other human rights organizations challenging surveillance by the NSA. NSA’s use of the program was illegally leaked in 2013 by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? We share what we found below. In addition, we just learned of a new NIJ study on the use of Chatbots in the Criminal Justice System to add to our list of online helpers.
A product launched this week claims to be the fastest search and review platform in legal for matters involving large document collections — discovery, investigations and compliance — and the first to seamlessly combine keyword and algorithmic search. So is it the fastest document search in legal?
Current legal frameworks are not necessarily equipped to handle deepfakes directly. The problem, of course, is that there is little legal precedent for applying the Federal Rules of Evidence to deepfakes. Deepfakes undermine evidence integrity in two key ways. Specifically, she cites two cases: Lorraine v. In Lorraine v.
Share In its first opinion of the 2023-24 term in an argued case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning threw out a dispute over whether a self-appointed “civil rights tester” has a legal right to file a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleging that a hotel had failed to provide information about its accessibility on its website.
Economic and non-economic losses, such as lost wages, medical bills, legal fees, property replacement and pain and suffering are addressed in loss valuations with punitive damages in some cases.
The college then prolonged the litigation, virtually forcing the family into insolvency. Oberlin President Carmen Twillie Ambar and the Board needlessly spent millions in litigation costs above the damages rather than admit that the college was wrong in the targeting of this grocery.
Deborah Laufer, who has physical disabilities and vision impairments, told the justices that she has voluntarily dismissed her case in the district court after an attorney who represented her in other cases was disciplined by a federal court in Maryland. That dearth of information, she contended, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Arnold , the parents of Caleigh Wood sued Charles County Public Schools in Maryland, the county board of education, and Evelyn Arnold and Shannon Morris, principal and vice principal of La Plata High School for violating a student’s (i.e. In the early 1960s, the Governor of Maryland appointed Roy Torcaso as a notary public.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. and non-U.S.
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure.
Laufer , the justices will consider when a self-appointed civil rights “tester” has a legal right to bring a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act. She will face off against her predecessor, former Solicitor General Noel Francisco, representing the industry groups. In Acheson Hotels v. The case has drawn widespread interest.
In addition, always remember to keep in touch with your legal and regulatory advisors to make sure that you don’t overlook any regulatory deadlines that are specific to your station. Always review these dates with your legal and technical advisors, and note other dates not listed here that may be relevant to your operations.
You can find more articles and resources to help build your legal career at InfoTrack’s website. Yet there’s one critical aspect of trust that legal professionals rarely talk about: the trust that we have in one another as colleagues within a law firm setting. Legal professionals work hard under incredible deadlines.
One of the briefs written in support of the district in the recent litigation was from constitutional scholars, including my colleague Alan B. He has not only previously written on the blog, but he is one of the most respected legal figures in the country with extensive litigation and public interest experience.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. On November 23, GM announced that it was withdrawing from the litigation. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. And the Supreme Court was likely strongly influenced by this backdrop of lower court legal consensus that the cases should be sent back to state court.
In the course of the litigation, Abdelhady asked the court to ignore her election (and receipt) of workers’ compensation benefits and find that the WCA does not apply after all. Abdelhady had a drawn out litigation under WCA to force payments from the university. Id. ¶ 174. I d. ¶ 154. ” Robinson v. Howard Univ., Robinson v.
That purpose, he told the justices, is undermined when federal courts allow a patchwork of state procedural rules to govern, creating a chaotic landscape where litigants face dramatically different procedural standards based solely on where they file. In a brief filed in December, Elizabeth Prelogar the U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The Second Circuit also distinguished the Connecticut program from a Maryland regulatory scheme that the U.S.
Over the years, our Legal Talk Network podcasters have been honored to host conversations with senators, justices, and other remarkable leaders shaping the legal and political landscape. Too many people, particularly the poorest people in America, dont have legal representation. North Dakota Senator Byron L.
The legal dispute concerns the extra contract support costs that the tribes use to administer health programs. Maryland ; and (2) whether suppressed impeachment evidence of the state’s key witness is per se non-material under Brady because that witness’ credibility had been otherwise impeached at trial. Maryland and Napue v.
A brief by the Chamber of Commerce argues that cases like Laufer’s are part of a “wave in abusive litigation” that is “driven by the economics of attorneys’ fees,” with “serial plaintiffs” (including Laufer) filed 67 percent of the “reservation rule” cases filed since the rule was issued in 2011.
The states California, along with Massachusetts, New Jersey, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin challenged the termination of the grants in federal court in Massachusetts. Those concerns, the states concluded, are properly litigated in the context of those other cases.
However, there are still some notable additions that raise more legal frights. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Maryland v. So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. Janik (2009).
She insists in the video that she knows all of the governing legal rules and shows the path in detail. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Maryland v. She later deleted her account (likely after her attorney regained consciousness). Janik (2009).
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. In Monday’s orders , the Supreme Court disposed of three relists. rescheduled before the Jan.
That’s what happened last week in District Court in Maryland. a judge in Maryland dismissed another suit against FDA for lack of standing. In dismissing the suit for lack of standing, the court in Maryland followed the precedent from Hippocratic Medicine. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. ,
Swalwell is a lawyer with a degree from the University of Maryland Law School. Swalwell is equally mistaken in his analogies to the medical and legal professions. Clients and Legal Consent. It was adopted by bars to give clients the right to direct their own legal affairs. Swalwell is missing is called informed consent.
This week, David Lat, who founded the blog Above the Law in 2006, and who earlier, in 2004, started the anonymous blog Underneath Their Robes , and who left blogging two years ago to take a job as a legal recruiter, is returning to writing as a full-time livelihood. But this time, Lat will not be publishing his writing on a blog.
It instructed jurors that they would sit through witness testimony and review evidence by a prosecutor, and then “discuss with each other the evidence and the legal instructions” before voting on whether or not there is probable cause to indict each felony suspect.
The owner of a Maine hotel argued that because the tester, Deborah Laufer, never intended to stay at the hotel, she does not have a legal right to bring a lawsuit. It agreed with Acheson that because Laufer did not intend to book a room at the inn, she did not have a legal right to sue, known as standing. But the U.S.
Below is my column in the Hill on the next round of litigation over the Second Amendment. Montgomery County, Maryland, officials have proposed to bar the legal right to carry firearms “in or within 100 yards of a place of public assembly.”. That includes simply passing through Times Square.
There, a judge held that chemical giant du Pont was bound by legal determinations made in three trials involving the discharge of acid into the Ohio River. Abbott , involving a challenge to the use of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel to hold that issues resolved in bellwether tort trials bind the defendant in later cases.
Weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the Steele dossier as “legal fees” among the $5.6 When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias “ pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Elias has been sanctioned in past litigation.
It then concluded with respect to the Hymes/Harwayne-Gidansky suit that the Dodd-Frank language quoted above simply codified the pre-existing legal standard and held their claims preempted. For insured claims, the insurer would have to seek the same information in litigation on a case-by-case basis. Maryland and Napue v.
This essay explores what “defund the police” means to leading criminologists, community organizers and legal scholars. Hitchens, the University of Maryland criminologist, thinks spillover is likely when police flood a neighborhood experiencing high crime. This is a legal process. Berkeley, Ca., The National Conversation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content