article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Gives Stare Decisis Effect to a Judgment of Claim Validity

Patently O

Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” is a legal principle that directs courts to adhere to previous judgments, i.e., precedent, when resolving a case with comparable facts. the Federal Circuit applied stare decisis to a prior validity ruling involving a different patent and a different accused infringer.

article thumbnail

Word of the Month for August 2019: Stare Decisis

Legal Research is Easy

Of course, this brings us to our word of the month: STARE DECISIS. According to Black's Law Dictionary, STARE DECISIS means: Latin: To stand by things decided. The doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Minnesota court to reconsider third-degree murder charge against George Floyd’s killer

JURIST

” The Court of Appeals has ruled “that its published opinions are binding on this court and on the district courts,” based on the premise of stare decisis.

article thumbnail

US dispatch: ‘independent state legislature’ theory raised by Moore v. Harper threatens US election administration

JURIST

On Wednesday, December 7, the US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case involving a fringe legal idea called the independent state legislature theory that poses a threat to the current system of election administration in the United States. Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. .

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules on life imprisonment for juveniles

JURIST

.” Even if the court had “doubts” about that rule, they should have provided “special justification” before overruling Miller and Montgomery , which they failed to do: How low this Court’s respect for stare decisis has sunk. … For most, the answer is yes. . … For most, the answer is yes.

article thumbnail

Two death penalty cases and free speech at animal facilities

SCOTUSBlog

Andrus further argues that the Texas court’s decision conflicts with “vertical stare decisis,” the principle that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions. In 2018, the Animal Legal Defense Fund – which, according to Kansas Gov. Animal Legal Defense Fund. Animal Legal Defense Fund.

article thumbnail

In family’s lawsuit against public nursing home, court revisits private rights of action and the spending clause

SCOTUSBlog

Talevski’s wife and legal guardian brought a Section 1983 action on his behalf against VCR, HHC, and other entities, alleging violations of his FNHRA rights. Stare decisis does not compel continued adherence to Section 1983 precedent, according to HHC. The district court dismissed the action, but the U.S.