SCOTUSBlog

MAY 26, 2022

Texas , which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v.

Stare Decisis 85

Stare Decisis Court Legal Legal 85

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2022

Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. In Monday’s orders , the Supreme Court disposed of three relists.

Statute 83

Statute Stare Decisis Court Drafting 83

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2022

Texas , which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v.

Government 87

Government Stare Decisis Court Litigation 87

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

He previously taught seminars on Breyer’s jurisprudence at American University Washington College of Law. Idealogues have sought to reshape the court’s jurisprudence in their own ideological vision, whether liberal or conservative, often at the expense of stare decisis and typically voiced most vigorously in dissenting opinions.

Stare Decisis 91

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Government Court 91

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

Despite annual columns questioning such apocalyptic predictions, which often seemed more political than legal, the granting of Dobbs led me to write my first “this could be it” column. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. That line was viewed as around 23 or 24 weeks.

Stare Decisis 36

Stare Decisis Court Laws Law School 36

JonathanTurley

MAY 4, 2022

No less a legal figure as Stephen Colbert declared “They knew, that if they were honest, they wouldn’t get the job. The first question would be the question that we’ve been discussing and that’s the issue of stare decisis. You begin with the touchstone of stare decisis and the preference for preserving precedent.

Stare Decisis 10

Stare Decisis Drafting Court Laws 10

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

Now, Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus has criticized Chief Justice Roberts as missing the point in his defense of the Court. I wanted to briefly respond on why the column replicates the historical and legal flaws of the Harris comments. In her column, What Chief Justice Roberts Misses , Marcus writes that.

Stare Decisis 38

Stare Decisis Court Education Laws 38

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

During a nearly 28-year career on the court, Breyer shunned rigid approaches to legal interpretation, often seeking functional rulings with an eye toward real-world consequences. The interview reportedly did not go well, and Clinton chose a 60-year-old Washington, D.C., A pivotal vote in religion cases.

Court 109

Court Stare Decisis Laws Legal 109