This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
(Photo by Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images) One of the quickest lessons you pick up in law school is that the path to knowing the law doesn’t end at finding a line in the Constitution or a statute and reading it aloud to anyone who would hear it. Moderated by Andrew T.
The Washington Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously held that a homeless person’s vehicle automatically qualifies as a homestead without the need for a declaration and that the impoundment of that vehicle and associated costs constitute excessive fines—a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution.
For a recent Reinventing Professionals podcast, I talked with Jacqueline Schafer, the founder and CEO of Clearbrief , a platform that uses AI to improve the accuracy of legal writing by identifying how well a writer’s sentence is supported by the source document. Legal writing has really specific requirements. seed round.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously struck down a Washington state law that was aimed at helping federal contract employees get workers’ compensation for diseases arising from cleaning up nuclear waste. The case, United States v.
FBI investigators determined that Meredith traveled to Washington, DC on January 6 with plans to attend rallies following the riots at the US Capitol. As Meredith’s text message traveled between DC and Georgia, the federal government had the necessary interstate jurisdiction to prosecute him under this statute.
The legal front is of utmost importance. When it comes to the merits of the case, the crime of genocide has a very high legal standard to prove, and the allegations of genocide were dismissed by ICJ in some previous legal cases. Ukraine has not yet become a State Party to the Rome Statute of the ICC.
Lawyers and legal professionals using the AI-powered document drafting tool Clearbrief to create a legal brief or document will now be able to seamlessly view any case law they cite thanks to a partnership with the legal research and intelligence company Fastcase , the companies announced today. million seed round. .
1, you're gonna have to opt-in for your plasticware in Washington. [ Ohio making it legal to serve alcohol at 18. A mob of one: Federal prosecutors are getting crafty with their statute application. [ This makes a lot more sense than if Ja Rule were consulted. [ Do you want a fork with that shake? Starting Jan.
Washington Post ] * Judge loses defamation suit over being linked to QAnon. Courthouse News Service ] * The Pacific Legal Foundation had themselves a DAY yesterday. Law360 ] * Of the previous 100 anti-LGBTQ+ statutes passed, half of them were this year. * Ken Paxton on the verge of impeachment. of papers outside his office.
After negotiations with the German government failed, the heirs filed a suit in the federal district court in Washington, DC, asserting several common law property claims and seeking $250 million in compensation. The Court directed the lower court to reconsider the case in light of the opinion in Germany v.
Gonzalez — In a new publication in the WashingtonLegal Foundation’s (WLF) Legal Backgrounder , we argue that FDA’s recent proposed rule regulating Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) is vulnerable to legal challenge, once finalized. By Jeffrey N. Gibbs & Steven J.
As faithful readers of our blog know, FDA’s broad interpretations of its governing statute have not always fared that well in the courts. Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has limited the Agency’s discretion to interpret the statute as it sees fit. In each of three cases— Genus v. FDA , Catalyst Pharms., FDA —the D.C.
In a statement, the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry said it was “prepared to perform its legal obligation and commence the execution process as part of the legally imposed sentence, regardless of method selected.”
For the sake of civilian safety, police must intervene if they see misconduct by colleagues,, according to a forthcoming paper in the George Washington Law Review. Kaufman, who is also a Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Such laws could take several forms.
The following year, Congress passed the first patent act that was then signed-into law by President George Washington. Three years later, Congress substantially rewrote the statute and, at that time changed the pronouns. 303, 308 (1980) (quoting 5 Writings of Thomas Jefferson 75–76 (Washington ed. LEGAL HIST. Gender Soc.
Natural Resources Defense Council , determines when a federal court must defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. First, under step one, if the court determines Congress’ intent is clear and unambiguous in the statute, the court will interpret the statute according to its terms, without deferring to the agency.
Still, the case illustrated the confusion surrounding application of the “initial aggressor” legal doctrine in U.S. jurisprudence, according to a forthcoming Legal Studies Research Paper published under the auspices of George Washington University Law School. The jury didn’t agree.
Two working groups in California have been studying potential reforms, with one examining creation of a regulatory sandbox program similar to Utah’s, and the other having recommended that specially trained paraprofessionals be allowed to provide limited legal services. Listening as the chief justice answers my question. .
The district court held that the federal Quiet Title Act’s 12-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional, concluded that a reasonable landowner would have known that the government had been permitting public use of the road since the 1970s, and dismissed the case. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed. That’s all for this week.
Two pending petitions raise the question of the constitutionality of state statutes providing that corporations are deemed to have consented to “general” personal jurisdiction by virtue of having registered to do business in a state. was filed by a plaintiff seeking to enforce a similar registration statute. Animal Legal Defense Fund.
Both cases present the question whether statutes that authorize appellate courts to review final agency adjudications implicitly strip district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to those proceedings. The next two relists raise a related question: whether a habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. Federal Trade Commission.
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.
When the Fed filed a motion to dismiss the groups’ complaint, arguing that the statute of limitations had run because it had issued the rule 10 years ago, the groups amended their complaint to add the Corner Post, a truck stop in Watford City, North Dakota that first opened for business in 2018. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v.
Washington. In 2018, the Animal Legal Defense Fund – which, according to Kansas Gov. Animal Legal Defense Fund. Animal Legal Defense Fund. In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a summary reversal – meaning it decided the case without merits briefing or oral argument – in Andrus v. The case is Kelly v.
In 2011, Thompson borrowed $110,000 from Washington Federal Bank for Savings, a small bank in Chicago’s Bridgeport neighborhood, where the Daley family made its name. Washington Federal Bank for Savings shut down in 2017 in the wake of an embezzlement scheme by the bank’s executives, and a few days after the bank’s president died by suicide.
The Seattle-based legal tech startup Clearbrief already uses artificial intelligence to strengthen your legal writing by finding the best evidence in the record to support your arguments (or debunk your opponent’s). That is why, said Schafer, it is important for users of the technology to “trust but verify.”
But local governments operate under varying legal parameters, and the Ninth Circuit decision has different implications for different building electrification requirements depending on location, legal landscape, and policy approach. This post is not expressing a legal opinion on Ithaca’s code.) Clean Air Act, not EPCA.
Share Several police officers outside the Supreme Court building have donned masks as haze from Canadian wildfires has become more noticeable in Washington this morning. United States , which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. “I Justice Sonia Sotomayor is up next with the announcement in Dubin v.
The court will hold the other case raising that question, Ham v. Breckon , pending the outcome in Jones. This week we have only one new relist: Thomas v.
4 in the challenge to the legality of the bankruptcy plan for Purdue Pharma, the manufacturer of the highly addictive opioid painkiller OxyContin. A Washington state couple contends that the tax, known as the “mandatory repatriation tax,” violates the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which gives Congress the power to impose an income tax.
City of Seattle, Washington 23-329 Issue : Whether Seattle’s restriction on private owners’ right to exclude potentially dangerous tenants from their property violates the 14th Amendment’s due process clause. based “legally significant act,” or that the U.S. effects were “legally significant” in addition to being direct.
Representing Percoco, lawyer Yaakov Roth told the justices that when Percoco promoted the development he was a private citizen who did not receive a salary and “possessed no legal authority to bind the state or make decisions for it.” Gorsuch pushed back, telling Reeves that Washington, D.C., “is
Many jurisdictions have statutes that protect public records from being intentionally damaged. Chuck Wexler, the executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, a Washington, D.C.-based Wexler, quoted in the Washington Post, asserts that officers usually aren’t lying when they report the details of a crime inaccurately.
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit disagreed, concluding that confirmation was inappropriate because Antrix lacked adequate contacts with the Western District of Washington, where Devas brought its suit. Im looking for a legal impediment to the course that Justice Kagan outlined, and Im not hearing one.
Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. relisted after the Jan. 25, March 4, March 18, March 25 and April 1 conferences). Goertz , 21-442. 1983 claim seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence begins to run at the end of state-court litigation denying DNA testing, including any appeals (as the U.S.
Castro-Huerta ’s legal issues are narrower than those in McGirt. As a result, most of eastern Oklahoma is now understood to be Indian country — a development that, according to the state, has disrupted the criminal justice system there.
Andrus argues that the Texas court “disregard[ed] this Court’s determinations and legal precedents to strain for a result that it prefers,” and in the process violated “vertical stare decisis,” the principle that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions. Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C.
Thus, the court will revisit its nearly 40-year-old precedents holding that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is jurisdictional. To begin with, the statute requires that the lawsuit be retained under seal while the government investigates the allegations. The Supreme Court’s sprint to the end of the term continues.
Washington (1945) and the requirement of “minimum contacts.” China’s messaging to the international community is,” they note, “somewhat confusing: it opposes the US practice of ‘long-arm jurisdiction,’ yet it has decided to build its own legal system of extraterritoriality.” Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe Co.
Plaintiffs next attempted to rely on a case from Washington to support the assertion that defendant’s distribution of the photos was outrageous. Without more, this activity cannot be deemed ‘outrageous’ in the legal sense. Rather, it is free expression. Click on the link to see the book’s Table of Contents.
As David Oxenford has previously commented, even in states where marijuana has been legalized, broadcasters should be cautious about accepting advertising for marijuana or related paraphilia. Nevertheless and although it is nowhere stated in the statute, the PTO has determined that “use in commerce” means “legal use in commerce.”
Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. Washington (1945). It is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog.
As the Washington Post reported last week, “Container ships are clogging ports, awaiting cargo or unable to get past the gridlock to unload their goods,” which range from toys and apparel and sneakers and electronics.
The most it could do, though, was allege that the Province had property in New York, and the statute is referring to the property that is the subject of the action. And very often the underlying claim didn’t have a strong connection with the United States in the first place.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content