Remove Legal Remove Tort Remove Vermont
article thumbnail

State “Climate Superfund” Bills: What You Need to Know

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure. Constitution.” billion tons.

Statute 62
article thumbnail

Medicaid, Medicare and House representation for the District of Columbia

SCOTUSBlog

United States , residents of the District of Columbia have brought an ambitious legal challenge seeking voting representation in Congress. Issue : Whether Vermont’s criminalization of lewd and lascivious conduct violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. In Castañon v. Castañon v. United States.

Tort 73
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: Third-Party Litigation Funding: Disclosure to Courts, Congress, and the Executive

Patently O

bankruptcy, class action, trademark, securities, and tort litigation, to the tune of $50 to $100 billion in investments annually. [10] 23] Such laws are already on the books in Arkansas, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, some of which limit the amount and type of funding entirely. [24]

article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Vermont Supreme Court Affirmed Public Utility Commission Approval for Solar Project. The Vermont Supreme Court upheld the Vermont Public Utility Commission’s decision granting a certificate of public good for construction and operation of a solar net-metering system. Gwich’in Steering Committee v. Bernhardt , Nos. Alaska Jan.

article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The mining company argued that the district court should not have issued the injunction without hearing legal arguments and factual evidence on the appropriate remedy, and without weighing the mandatory factors for a mandatory injunction. The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. 349-6-16WNCV (Vt.

Court 40