This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” Sadly, that question became even more pertinent in February 2021, when Jessica Wade of The Omaha World-Herald had an article headlined “ Woman convicted in 1998 Bellevue slaying dies in prison at 40.” ” Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the U.S.
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
Even an innocent remark about you being tired or upset about something at the time of the crash could be used later on as a pretext to lower the damages you deserve.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? We share what we found below. In addition, we just learned of a new NIJ study on the use of Chatbots in the Criminal Justice System to add to our list of online helpers.
In response to this latest lawsuit, a regional attorney for the EEOC's St. Louis District Office admitted that the United States still has a long way to go in terms of ensuring workers' rights.
This Litigation Was Pretty Juicy. The plaintiff, who lived in Illinois, sought to pursue claims on behalf of herself and a class of other Illinois-based purchasers, together with those consumers who lived in Arkansas, Iowa, Wyoming, Texas, Nebraska, South Dakota, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Nebraska and Montana. In Cristia v.
The National Labor Relations Board's recent ruling against a Nebraska meat processor, ordering an expanded range of remedies for the employer's repeated labor law violations, signals the NLRB's willingness to impose harsh remedies more frequently, in the full spectrum of unfair labor practice litigation, say Eric Stuart and Zachary Zagger at Ogletree. (..)
If enough broadcasters opt into this agreement, it will end the long-running litigation between GMR and RMLC. See our blog post here with thoughts on some of the considerations that broadcasters should take into account in deciding whether to accept the GMR license agreement.
graduated from the Creighton University School of Law and practiced for many years in banking and commercial litigation in Omaha, Nebraska before she “attempted” to retire in South Carolina. Before Law School, she worked as a paralegal for a number of years and was the first CLA in the state of Nebraska.
The illegal destruction of disciplinary records can make it harder to hold deputies accountable in a court of law, or track problem officers moving from department to department, said Sam Walker, emeritus professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. We’re not a law enforcement or compliance agency.
On January 15 , the 45-day “political window” is scheduled to open in Texas for the primary election to be held on March 1 (note that there is litigation over redistricting in Texas that could delay the primary date – which could also affect the opening of this window).
It concluded that the case should have been dismissed because the parties had previously agreed in their choice-of-court clause to litigate all disputes in the United States. states—Nebraska, New Hampshire, and North Dakota—have adopted similar statutes based on the Model Choice of Forum Act. This is unusual. Only three other U.S.
The actuarial board did not adopt a binding definition until 2015 — 13 years after CMS promulgated the regulation. The company faced a series of demands from the FTC it viewed as unreasonable.
The agency allegedly attempted to coerce TV stations to stop airing the ad, resulting in litigation with FPF. Amendments in Arizona , Montana , Colorado , Nebraska , Maryland , South Dakota and Nevada formed the remainder of the funds raised according to AP’s data source, Open Secrets.
Six states, led by Nebraska, went to federal court in Missouri to challenge the program. 1 declined to put the 8th Circuit’s ruling on hold while litigation continued, it agreed to take up the case without waiting for the court of appeals to weigh in. But the states appealed to the U.S. Although the Supreme Court on Dec.
See In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig. , Nebraska , without a standing quandary or this term’s Acheson Hotels v. . § 1254(2), the lesser-known companion to the provision that gives the Supreme Court certiorari jurisdiction (§1254(1)). 4th 455 (6th Cir. Laufer case free from mootness. 3d 377.
Nebraska , brought by six states. In both cases, the justices rejected requests from the Biden administration for permission to temporarily reinstate the program while litigation continues, but they agreed to take up the cases and fast-track them without waiting for the courts of appeals to weigh in. Nebraska (Feb. New York v.
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023, [1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation. [2] Nebraska, 600 U.S. Times , Oct. 12, 2022. [49] 49] Van Engelen, op.
” Borrowers who enrolled in SAVE will continue to have their payments paused as the litigation plays out. Nebraska that federal law “does not authorize the loan cancellation plan.” ” The SAVE plan’s provisions were scheduled to take effect last month.
That prompted the Biden administration to come to the Supreme Court in December, asking the justices to put the district courts’ rulings on hold and allow the rule to take effect nationwide while litigation continues.
Nebraska and Department of Education v. The prior administration implemented that pause, incidentally, citing the same law that the Biden administration is using, but that move did not trigger litigation, which may reveal something about the motives of the plaintiffs. A preview of the cases is here. Jonathan D.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The result is a horn of plenty for litigators. The Golden Ponds restaurant in Greece, New York is still being hit with new cases in the litigation stemming from last year. Of course, some accidents have happy endings.
Six states, led by Nebraska, went to federal court in Missouri to challenge the program. 18 , asking the justices to allow the government to implement the program while litigation continues in the lower courts. 31, they will now resume 60 days after the litigation is resolved or, at the latest, Sept.
Our involvement in this case, Nebraska v. In Nebraska v. Of course, at this moment of transition in Washington, the fate of both this litigation and the HDV Rule are vulnerable to shifting priorities as the second Trump administration takes office. EPA (concerning power plant emissions standards) and Kentucky v.
Not only is there a pending case on the docket of the Court that has long been viewed as a serious threat to Roe , but the White House and the House of Representatives are threatening immediate actions that could also create new challenges for pro-choice litigants. Carhart struck down a partial-birth abortion law in Nebraska.
This blog post explores how the litigation landscape has developed since the SEC proposed the rule, and discusses the implications of several developing cases and doctrines. Together, these matters suggest a volatile litigation landscape that the SEC will have to navigate thoughtfully as it finalizes and defends the climate disclosure rule.
Nebraska (1925), the Court struck down a state law prohibiting instruction in German. This right of consent is ongoing and can be exercised at any point in the litigation. .” As a threshold matter, it is important to note that parents have always had a say in the education of their children. Indeed, in Meyer v. Informed Consent.
Key Questions of Fiduciary Duty and Free Speech These recent victories involve legal principles of fiduciary duty and free speech, which have been central areas of contention in litigation surrounding climate-related financial risk. The litigation over California’s climate disclosure rules , which were issued in late 2023, is further along.
The most powerful new weapon in police reform litigation involves state attorneys general. If every state AG took on police misconduct it would multiply the number of litigating agencies by a factor of 50. The activism of state attorneys general adds a powerful new tool in the fight for police reform. Readers’ comments are welcome.
Nebraska , was filed by six states with Republican attorneys general. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit reversed Autrey’s ruling and put the program on hold nationwide to maintain the status quo while litigation continued. Two different challenges to the debt-relief program are now before the Supreme Court. The first case, Biden v.
Erez Reuveni had worked at the Justice Department for nearly 15 years, most recently as the acting deputy director of the Office of Immigration Litigation. It only addresses hot potato situations in litigation as if they are deliberate decisions made before accepting a new representation. Read Formal Opinion 516 in full here.
The absence of clear guidance from the Supreme Court distinguishing “major” questions from “non-major” ones has complicated efforts to establish the boundaries of the doctrine, and litigators have moved quickly to exploit this ambiguity in the doctrine’s rhetoric. As Justice Kagan points out in her Biden v.
Breyer stressed that because the Nebraska law did not have any exception to protect the health of the mother, it was unconstitutional. But, he continued, there is no other way “to acquaint the reader with the technical distinctions among different abortion methods and related factual matters, upon which the outcome of this case depends.”.
Jackson then snagged a highly sought-after spot as an associate at Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin, a Washington litigation boutique that later merged with Baker Botts, a Texas-based firm. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit by President Ronald Reagan, from 1997 to 1998. In Stenberg v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content