SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

Two pending petitions raise the question of the constitutionality of state statutes providing that corporations are deemed to have consented to “general” personal jurisdiction by virtue of having registered to do business in a state. was filed by a plaintiff seeking to enforce a similar registration statute. Returning Relists.

Statute 107

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 107

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2022

Thus, the court will revisit its nearly 40-year-old precedents holding that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is jurisdictional. The FCA gives the government a fair amount of ability to control the litigation. The Supreme Court’s sprint to the end of the term continues. United States. United States and Ruan v.

Government 102

Government Stare Decisis Court Litigating 102

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2022

Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.

Statute 97

Statute Stare Decisis Court Drafting 97

Conflict of Laws

MARCH 10, 2021

8] It should be stressed that Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum is not binding on lower courts according to the Nigerian common law doctrine of stare decisis. This Convention will work better in Nigerian courts if litigation is made attractive for international commercial actors, so they can designate Nigerian courts as the chosen forum.

Court 52

Court Contract Stare Decisis Entertainment 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 17, 2024

Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. The question in this challenge to the rule, he said should focus on what the best reading of the statute is. Litigants,” she said, “will come out of the woodwork.”

Court 145

Court Statute Stare Decisis Small Business 145

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 20, 2023

The court asks if there is a “clear, affirmative indication” from the face of the statute that Congress intended the law to apply extraterritorially. Therefore, a party claiming that a federal statute applies extraterritorially can have essentially two bites at the apple. Has Congress directly spoken here?

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Laws Statute Construction 98

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

Mississippi acknowledges that it must overcome the principle of “stare decisis” – the idea that courts should normally follow their prior precedent. But here, the state insists, the “stare decisis case for overruling Roe and Casey is overwhelming.” Stare decisis and the Kavanaugh test.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Laws Statute 145