Remove Litigation Remove Manufacturing Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Last Friday was a Good Day for Those Who Want to Litigate Against the Federal Government.

FDA Law

By JP Ellison — Last Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a trio of decisions making it easier to litigate against the federal government. While in the present case, the manufacturer, retailer, and trade association were all part of the same lawsuit, nothing in the Court’s decision requires that the applicant be a party to such a challenge.

article thumbnail

S. Ct. Unanimously Rejects Mexico's Lawsuit Against Smith & Wesson

The Volokh Conspiracy

Estados Unidos Mexicanos : The Government of Mexico brought this lawsuit against seven American gun manufacturers. As required by a federal statute, Mexico seeks to show (among other things) that the defendant companies participated in the unlawful sale or marketing of firearms. 7903(5)(A)(iii).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court: Hearing in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Mexico). Selling guns comparable to selling beer to teenagers?

Conflict of Laws

As previously indicated, this is a much-politicized case brought by Mexico against US gun manufacturers. Consequently, it is not about determining which aspects of Mexicos allegations would survive during the litigation (and some are controversial), as indicated by one of the counsels, but whether they pass this legal hurdle.

article thumbnail

Justices to review novel bankruptcy maneuver in public harms litigation

SCOTUSBlog

Share Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy deal, which will reach the Supreme Court for oral argument on Monday , is just one of many examples of recent unorthodox civil procedure maneuvers in public harms litigation. Although the statute formally allows for only pre-trial consolidation, 99% of cases consolidated into MDL settle.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in surveillance and copyright cases

JURIST

This doctrine allows the government to potentially dismiss litigation that would require disclosure of information damaging to national security. involves a complicated copyright dispute between two clothing manufactures. A lawsuit was filed in 2011 but was dismissed based on state secrets privilege. H&M Hennese & Mauritz, L.P

Court 197
article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

In 2009, Congress passed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which gives the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products and requires manufacturers to obtain the FDAs permission before putting a new tobacco product on the market. What arguments could you raise, she queried, that would be different than the manufacturer?

Court 93
article thumbnail

Court rules that e-cigarette retailers can seek judicial review in the 5th Circuit

SCOTUSBlog

Writing for the majority, Barrett explained that plaintiffs can only rely on a statute to bring a lawsuit when they fall within the “‘zone of interests’ that the statute protects” – that is, they belong “to the class of persons to whom the statute grants a right to sue.”