SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
The government, in turn, focuses on the structure of the CSA — the words denoting mens rea, “knowingly or intentionally,” come after the exception clause at issue and so, the government argues, do not apply to it. It’s possible the court will focus on this potential middle ground to navigate the complexities of this landscape.
Patently O
FEBRUARY 3, 2023
The question is whether his intent (mens rea) matters, or can he be convicted based only upon the reasonably perceived threat of the recipient.). Although not a patent case, this issue comes up all the time in patent litigation). Colorado (When does speech rise to a “true threat”, unprotected by the First Amendment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 14, 2021
Justice Samuel Alito – not the biggest fan of legislative history – read a lengthy statement from David Fitzgerald, who served as a litigation attorney for the FTC during the 1970 and 1980s. It seems that what you’re doing here is using it for something that has already happened.”
FDA Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
We note our prior writings on the subject, which extend to five pages of posts , We note further that the JAMA editorial cites our own John Fleder , which makes sense since John is one of the foremost experts on Park liability from his time at the Department of Justice’s Office of Consumer Litigation as well as private practice with our firm.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
While the argument that “principles of equity” includes a willfulness requirement would not “directly contradict the statute’s other, express mens rea provisions or render them wholly superfluous[,]. Importance of the Defendant’s Mental State to Awarding Pro?ts. But what is the practical effect of the Court’s decision?
LexForti
NOVEMBER 17, 2022
Nevertheless, in circumstances of this nature, the legal principle of “mens rea” ought to be looked at in order to facilitate better decision-making on both the side of the defendant and the plaintiff The POCSO Court in Bombay, while adjudicating the “ Satish Ragde vs. the State of Maharashtra (Criminal Appeal no.
At the Lectern
FEBRUARY 20, 2025
See: Writ petition advances to require electronic recording of some court proceedings for indigent litigants. ” The dissenter, however, said, “I agree with the majoritys analysis that the record of conviction conclusively establishes that Godlock acted with the requisite intent to kill (the mens rea).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content