Litigation Mississippi Statute 
JURIST
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
Justice Thissen’s opinion also held that the statute did not create the racially disparate impact of felony disenfranchisement. However, Justice Natalie Hudson said in her dissent that the statute creates racial disparities and is, therefore, unconstitutional.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 24, 2025
Reynolds Vapor Company and a group of retailers based in Texas and Mississippi, primarily fielded questions from just two justices, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson a promising sign for his clients. As a practical matter, he asked Suri, why is it inconvenient for the government to litigate in one circuit instead of another?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 9, 2021
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, the viability of certain types of disability-based claims under three federal statutes. Mississippi. One petition involves the Americans with Disabilities Act.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 2, 2021
The court added nine other cases to its docket for the 2021-22 term, on issues ranging from securities litigation to interstate water disputes. Mississippi v. Other grants on Friday’s order list. Those cases (which, like the Maine school-funding case, are likely to be heard in the fall) are: Cummings v. Pivotal Software v.
Day on Torts
MARCH 11, 2022
During oral arguments, plaintiff also suggested that Owens was inapplicable because the statute cited therein, Tenn. 34-6-208, would not apply to this power of attorney because it was executed in Mississippi. (internal citation omitted). Code Ann. §
Day on Torts
JULY 26, 2022
In the context of countering plaintiffs’ assertion that the death was a homicide, defendant shared autopsy photographs of the son as well as some of his text messages, both of which were public records released by the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office. Summary judgment was therefore affirmed.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 1, 2021
20-219 , asks whether the compensatory damages available under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the statutes that incorporate its remedies, such as the Rehabilitation Act and the Affordable Care Act , include compensation for emotional distress. Then there is a case on the court’s original docket , Mississippi v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
185 
Let's personalize your content