This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
However, the constitutions of six states do have provisions with explicit environmental rights – Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana, Pennsylvania, and RhodeIsland. The court therefore allowed the litigation to proceed. If the final plan falls short, some litigants may well invoke this amendment.
Hain moved the case to federal court, asserting that the Palmquists had fraudulently included Whole Foods in the case to defeat diversity jurisdiction under a Texas statute protecting innocent sellers from liability. The district court agreed and dismissed Whole Foods with prejudice. 17 conferences.) Ocean State Tactical, LLC v.
It reasoned that loss and miscarriage cover intentional acts, as the statute only qualifies transmission with negligent. In an unusual move, Konan, reprented by the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, has filed a conditional cross-petition ( Konan v. But the U.S. 1985(3) , does not apply to federal officials.
For example, in recent years, federal courts have denied motions for preliminary injunction in litigation pertaining to the South Fork Wind , Vineyard Wind , and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind projects.
Below is my column in the Wall Street Journal on the ongoing opioid litigation and an important ruling out of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The product-liability tort gives companies an incentive to minimize risks while empowering litigants to seek redress for injuries. Yet it leaves the matter far from resolved. In State v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Federal Court in RhodeIsland Allowed Failure-to-Adapt Claims to Proceed. Derivative Litigation , No. and non-U.S.
The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented. Defendants actions in this case potentially run roughshod over a bulwark of the Constitution by interfering with Congresss appropriation of federal funds.
Lastly, it appears that the seven horse-racing cases implicating the private nondelegation doctrine have been put on hold pending the outcome of a pair of cases implicating that doctrine that the court has scheduled to decide later this term or perhaps the horse-racing cases are about to be rescheduled. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Given this “unmitigable prejudice,” the court concluded “that this litigation cannot, in good conscience, continue in the Tribe’s absence.”
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. RhodeIsland Federal Court Denied Motion to Stay Remand Order in RhodeIsland’s Climate Change Case.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Fossil fuel companies also filed their reply brief in their appeal of the remand order in RhodeIsland’s case. filed Jan.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. State court proceedings in RhodeIsland’s case were put on hold in August pending the U.S. RhodeIsland v.
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit affirmed , holding that because a federal agency now has the final say over how the private horse-racing authority implements the federal statute, the amended law did not impermissibly delegate authority to a private entity. In a one-paragraph order, the justices granted the authoritys request. Franklin v.
Today’s hiding comes courtesy of Judge John McConnell in RhodeIsland, who is not impressed with the government’s claim to have violated his prior TRO by accident. Note that this prohibition was not tied to the OMB memo, which had by then been rescinded in a ham-handed effort to moot the litigation.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. RhodeIsland , No. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. 20-884 (U.S. 20-783 (U.S. 20-900 (U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. RhodeIsland , No. and non-U.S. Chevron Corp. 20-884 (U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation , No. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 147.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. RhodeIsland v. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. Energy Policy Advocates v. July 15, 2021).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content