SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Case in point: Texas v. That case, which involved Texas’ challenge to a regulation that delegated governmental authority to an actuarial group to set standards for Medicaid reimbursement, had been rescheduled twice and relisted six times going into last Friday’s conference. Texas , a capital case from the Lone Star State.

Stare Decisis 103

Stare Decisis Court Felony Statute 103

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 12, 2022

Texas , 21-5050. 1983 claim seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence begins to run at the end of state-court litigation denying DNA testing, including any appeals (as the U.S. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. Returning Relists.

Stare Decisis 114

Stare Decisis Court Statute Litigating 114

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

The question is whether the United States is such a successful litigant that the court will grant review even in cases it doesn’t want the court to review. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. Returning Relists.

Stare Decisis 84

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 84

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2022

The FCA gives the government a fair amount of ability to control the litigation. Then the government can intervene if it wishes and take the lead in litigating the case; or it can decline to intervene and let the relator litigate the case. Texas prisoner Anibal Canales Jr. Texas , 21-6001. Last up is Canales v.

Government 89

Government Stare Decisis Court Litigating 89

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

Texas , involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. Texas , 21-6001. A short explanation of relists is available here. Goertz , 21-442. relisted after the Feb.

Statute 107

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 107

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2022

They contend that overbroad application of the court’s older precedents essentially would “ federaliz[e] much medical-malpractice litigation ,” and say the court should use this case as an opportunity to clarify the proper tests for recognizing a private right of action. Texas , 21-6001. Returning Relists.

Statute 86

Statute Stare Decisis Court Drafting 86

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

Wednesday’s argument in Dobbs , which involves a Mississippi ban on almost all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy, comes 30 days after the court heard arguments in another consequential abortion controversy: a pair of challenges to a six-week abortion ban that took effect in Texas on Sept. Stare decisis and the Kavanaugh test.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Laws Statute 145