This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Slowly but surely” may be an apt phrase to describe the results from the 2022 ABA Legal Technology Survey Report covering LitigationTechnology & E-Discovery. Many Years and Much Litigation. Software for Litigation & E-Discovery.
If your profession includes anything related to litigation (paralegal, attorney, support staff, technology person, project manager, etc.), Let’s answer that question for others who are just joining the profession or jumping into the litigation practice from another specialty. Ediscovery Technology Explained.
Tremendous opportunities exist for transactional practitioners to leverage technology to optimize outcomes. Each trend has its roots in the now well-established field of litigation-support technology. Another important tool in the litigator’s toolbox is TechnologyAssistedReview (TAR).
One of the first companies to offer a cloud-based, end-to-end e-discovery platform when it launched in 2008, Casepoint was granted three patents last October related to its technologyassistedreview (TAR) technology, including two linked patents specifically tied to its CaseAssist technology.
Your 3-Step Plan to Accelerate Your Litigation Paralegal Career Open more doors for higher income potential and more job opportunities. GET ACCESS HIS PATH TO E-DISCOVERY CERTIFICATION The CEDS certification actually didn’t exist when I was a litigation paralegal. Discover where your litigation career path can take you.
Technology is a foundational enabler for meeting the scale and speed challenges of second requests while avoiding exorbitant costs. The technology toolkit will very likely include technology-assistedreview (TAR), predictive coding, technology-enabled workflows, and AI tools including machine translation for multi-lingual matters.
Company founder and CEO John Tredennick formerly founded the e-discovery company Catalyst, one of the first cloud-based discovery platforms and one of the first to develop advanced technology-assistedreview. Catalyst was acquired by OpenText for $75 million in 2019.
For issue codes to be effective, they must be coded in a consistent manner so that they’re searchable throughout the course of litigation. Anything more than 8-10 tags significantly slows down the pace of review and increases costs while offering very little return value.
Especially when it comes to technology, many lawyers are reluctant to put their confidence in workflows and solutions that seem to operate in a black box. Technology-assistedreview is a prime example—although the use of predictive coding and other advanced analytics have been widely accepted in the U.S.
Alex Chatzistamatis: If you take COVID-19 as a whole, obviously it has thrown a huge monkey wrench into many areas of litigation with an uptick in litigation itself – whether it’s legal disputes, contractual issues, financing, employment, etc. These days, we call it CAL, continuous active learning.
Dan Regard, founder and Chief Executive Officer of iDiscovery Solutions, talks about how the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure play into this aspect of litigation and the optimal order of operations or procedures for dealing with varying types of data. What does that mean in the context of litigation and discovery?
The company’s history is tarred by claims of unethical behavior, from Facebook’s questionable beginnings in Mark Zuckerberg’s Harvard dorm room (as depicted in The Social Network ) to large-scale privacy failings demonstrated in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Today, Meta is fighting antitrust litigation in the U.S.
According to Ojibwe law, manoomin, or wild rice, has the right to exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve. Now we'll see if that right stands up in court.
Although most litigation and investigations review work is unique to each case, there are certain aspects that can be pre-modeled when it comes to identifying repeating key language or legal themes. Here are some tools organizations should evaluate for use: Pre-built natural language processing AI models.
Legal teams have been using technology for many decades to assist with the burdensome and costly task of document review for litigation – so much so that court guidelines now advise on the use of AI for high volume disclosures (TAR).
Fundamentally, unlike a litigation document review, where critical facts are known and issues defined, in ECA or an investigation often there is little information to go on or none at all. How have legal teams typically tackled challenges such as traditional approaches to ECA and investigations? So, it’s a very efficient solution.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. On November 23, GM announced that it was withdrawing from the litigation. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
With workplace and regulatory investigations on the rise, leveraging e-discovery technologies are no longer exclusively a litigation-specific endeavor. As such, the principles and criteria guiding the management of investigations differ from those guiding a responsive review.
This is not the first litigation that the Premier has had to confront from environmental groups regarding the inquiry. Ecojustice, a non-profit environmental law group, filed suit against the government in 2020 for launching the inquiry alleging the government acted improperly.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation , No. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. In re Public Service Company of New Mexico , No.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE RECENT ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. filed Dec.
If justice delayed is justice denied, our court system is becoming a tar pit of injustice, with litigants left without verdicts or relief for years. In 2004, the number of cases in district court pending for more than three years was 18,280. This year, there are 81,617.
If justice delayed is justice denied, our court system is becoming a tar pit of injustice, with litigants left without verdicts or relief for years. In 2004, the number of cases in district court pending for more than three years was 18,280. This year, there are 81,617.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content