This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Appellate Court of Maryland Tuesday reinstated the conviction of Adnan Syed for the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee and remanded the case. Under the Maryland law, “before a hearing on a motion filed under this section, the victim or victim’s representative shall be notified.”
Judge Sandra Ikuta stated that the statutes that govern removing cases from state to federal court must be interpreted narrowly. Two other US circuit courts have since remanded cases by Baltimore and Colorado municipalities. Other lawsuits are still pending.
Share Kevin Younger was detained before trial at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. The statute requires exhaustion as a matter of law; whether remedies were available for an individual prisoner is a fact-specific inquiry. The post Justices to hear procedural question in Maryland prison-assault case appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
dba Cover Girls , in which the justices have been asked to decide when the statute of limitations begins to run on a claim of a pattern or practice of racial discrimination. The justices will be discussing just one of them for a second time: Nicholson v. 1981 , which prohibits racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts.
Last month in a similar case, a Maryland judge issued a preliminary injunction to prevent Governor Larry Hogan from withdrawing from the CARES Act program and terminating federal unemployment assistance for over 300,000 Maryland residents. There the plaintiffs succeeded after arguing that Gov.
In this case, Chevron removed the lawsuit to a federal district court in Maryland, pointing to eight different grounds for removal. Under federal law, cases filed in state court can be transferred – the technical term is “removed” – to federal court if they meet one of several criteria. Arguments of the oil companies.
The Supreme Court has issued a number of decisions in recent years limiting the reach of the federal wire-fraud statute, which outlaws the use of “the wires” – including internet and phone lines – to commit fraud. As part of its retention efforts, Yukom employees emailed two investors in Maryland and contacted a third by phone call.
The 2017 Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. The FDA is headquartered in Maryland, and that was the office that received the ANDA documents. and probably also in Maryland, but not in N.J. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed.
The city filed its case in a Maryland state court. That is precisely what Chevron did in this case: It transferred the suit to a federal court in Maryland – a procedure known as “removal.” The 4th Circuit ruled that it could review only whether removal was appropriate under the federal officer statute – which, it concluded, it was not.
In a speech at Harvard Law School in 2015, Justice Elena Kagan told the audience that “we’re all textualists now” – that is, that any effort to interpret a statute begins (and often ends) with the language of the statute. That principle may ultimately prove dispositive in BP v. Justice Stephen Breyer appeared unconvinced.
Hain moved the case to federal court, asserting that the Palmquists had fraudulently included Whole Foods in the case to defeat diversity jurisdiction under a Texas statute protecting innocent sellers from liability. The district court agreed and dismissed Whole Foods with prejudice. Relisted after the Jan. 17 conferences.)
Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate statute, a pharmaceutical manufacturer whose drug prices increase faster than the rate of inflation must pay additional per-unit rebates to the program. The statute defines a “line extension” as a “new formulation” of an existing drug, with certain exceptions. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 23-1457 (4th Cir.
Maryland , a defendant must show that he could not have obtained the suppressed, exculpatory evidence through his own independent efforts of “self-help” or “due diligence” as the U.S. Issues : (1) Whether spending-clause statutes ever give rise to privately enforceable rights under 42 U.S.C. In Blankenship v. Blankenship v.
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. District Court and won, prompting a government appeal to the D.C. In affirming the District Court’s ruling, the D.C.
A federal court in California convicted Hansen of multiple counts of fraud, as well as convincing two of his customers to overstay their visas and participate in his adoption program in violation of the encourage-or-induce statute. Hansen appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. In United States v. Mansfield v.
In a rare move, Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley has sent letters to Maryland Gov. Hogan: “I would respectfully request that you direct the Maryland State Police to enforce Maryland and Montgomery County laws that squarely prohibit picketing at the homes of Supreme Court Justices who reside in Maryland.”
Kirschenbaum — On March 31, the Federal District Court for the District of Maryland upheld CMS’s definition of a “new formulation” under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP). Under the statute, a line extension is a ‘new formulation” that is not an abuse-deterrent formulation. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MJM-22-977 (Dist.
The issue the court confronted was a procedural matter: Can the defendant energy companies use the federal removal statutes (see 28 USC Section 1442) to remove a state law climate change lawsuit to federal court? In this case, both the Maryland federal district court and the U.S. SUPREME COURT. BP PLC, et al.
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure.
Glenn Youngkin and Maryland Gov. However, although peaceful, the demonstrations appear to have been illegal, according to legal experts, citing a statute from 1950 that prohibits any demonstration “with the intent of influencing any judge.” Virginia Gov. Protesting the potential overturning of Roe v.
The report says that as a consequence of bias in the criminal justice system, the statutes meant to protect racial minorities and marginalized groups are less effective. Hate crime laws in the U.S. Advocates are quoted in the report claiming that existing laws can discourage hate crime victims from coming forward.
One “friend of the court” brief filed in support of Pulsifer tells the justices that the lower court’s ruling “turns the statute on its head by foreclosing safety-valve relief for the vast majority of defendants to whom the statutory amendment might apply.”
When HRSA threatened enforcement action and penalties, several companies sued the HHS in federal district courts in Maryland, Indiana, Delaware, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia to enjoin those enforcement actions (see list below). Because of concerns that these contract pharmacies, which include some of the largest chains in the U.S.,
Kirschenbaum — In November 2020, we blogged about a decision by the Federal District Court of Maryland dismissing a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam suit alleging that Forest Laboratories knowingly reported inflated best prices under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), resulting in underpayment of rebates. Burr , 551 U.S.
By federal statute, sponsors of "electioneering communications" must disclose the names and addresses of each donor who contributed $1000 or more to the sponsoring organization. " Maryland Rep. This is is the provision that led to the US District Court decision at issue.
For example, the Maryland standing order allows all Maryland licensed pharmacists to dispense naloxone, including any necessary sup??plies By statute, certain activities are automatically excluded from particular DSCSA requirements upon the declaration of a public health emergency under section 319 of the PHS Act.
PJM Interconnection had identified grid congestion across the Pennsylvania-Maryland border and concluded that such congestion had led to approximately $800 million in costs from 2012 to 2016. For instance, in its 2013 report on Policies for a Modern and Reliable U.S.
The statute reads, in relevant part: “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State. Maryland , 378 U.S. ” 42 U.S.C. Quoting Griffin v. 130 (1964).
Importantly, “price increase” is not defined in this statute. We expect the Minnesota law to face Commerce Clause, vagueness, and possibly other constitutional challenges, similar to those brought against a generic price gouging prohibition in Maryland that was struck down by the Fourth Circuit in 2018 (see our post here ).
It reasoned that loss and miscarriage cover intentional acts, as the statute only qualifies transmission with negligent. Konan argues that the 5th Circuit is the lone court on the wrong side of a split in holding that the statute that prohibits conspiracy to violate civil rights, 42 U.S.C. But the U.S. Relisted after the Jan.
The case was currently pending before the Fourth Circuit after a federal district court in Maryland held that Maryland law preempted the local law. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute.
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v.
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.
In recent years, the Supreme Court has expressed misgivings about white-collar prosecutions under broadly worded statutes. Judge Gregg Costa, joined by six other judges, wrote that “[t]he Supreme Court’s message is unmistakable: Courts should not assign federal criminal statutes a ‘breathtaking scope’ when a narrower reading is reasonable.”
Circuit upheld the regulation, holding that “the disputed rule is consistent with the best interpretation of ‘machine gun’ under the governing statutes.” Maryland and Napue v. In Cargill , the en banc U.S.
The National Marine Fisheries Service construed the governing statute to allow it to require industry to pay the salaries of those monitors. Circuit held that the statute was reasonably read to allow the agency to require industry to pay the cost of federal monitors. A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 17 and Mar.
The court considered the statutes ambiguous, which meant that under normal principles of Indian Law, they must be construed in favor of the tribe. Maryland ; and (2) whether suppressed impeachment evidence of the state’s key witness is per se non-material under Brady because that witness’ credibility had been otherwise impeached at trial.
Take, for example, the more than 100 cases filed nationally against brand hotelier franchisors beginning in late 2019, for alleged sex trafficking occurring on premise under the same statute. These cases gave way to more filings against Big Tech, namely Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, and others. The remedy should be clear.
In April, the Maryland legislature passed a landmark law called the Child Victims Act, which repealed the statute of limitations and permits survivors of child abuse to file civil lawsuits at any time. The deadline is a compromise between the Feb. The law took effect on Oct.
Fifty sexual abuse survivors have opened a lawsuit against the Maryland government, alleging rampant sexual abuse of young people in six of the states juvenile justice facilities over five decades, Erin Cox and Steve Thompson report for the Washington Post.
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
Brown , 24-203 Issue: Whether the Constitution permits Maryland to ban semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, including the most popular rifle in America. In such cases, the rule is that federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedural law. Relisted after the Jan. 21 and Feb. 28 conferences.)
The Supreme Court has held that the federal government assumes a trust obligation to assert reserved water rights for Native tribes only when it “ expressly accepts those responsibilities by statute ,” by regulation, or by treaty with a tribe. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
permits courts to defer to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ construction of a statute designed to benefit veterans, without first considering the pro-veteran canon of construction; and (2) whether Chevron should be overruled. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 28 and Oct.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content