This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Appellate Court of Maryland Tuesday reinstated the conviction of Adnan Syed for the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee and remanded the case. Under the Maryland law, “before a hearing on a motion filed under this section, the victim or victim’s representative shall be notified.”
Share Kevin Younger was detained before trial at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. The statute requires exhaustion as a matter of law; whether remedies were available for an individual prisoner is a fact-specific inquiry. The post Justices to hear procedural question in Maryland prison-assault case appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Judge Sandra Ikuta stated that the statutes that govern removing cases from state to federal court must be interpreted narrowly. Two other US circuit courts have since remanded cases by Baltimore and Colorado municipalities. Other lawsuits are still pending.
Last month in a similar case, a Maryland judge issued a preliminary injunction to prevent Governor Larry Hogan from withdrawing from the CARES Act program and terminating federal unemployment assistance for over 300,000 Maryland residents. There the plaintiffs succeeded after arguing that Gov.
The Supreme Court has issued a number of decisions in recent years limiting the reach of the federal wire-fraud statute, which outlaws the use of “the wires” – including internet and phone lines – to commit fraud. As part of its retention efforts, Yukom employees emailed two investors in Maryland and contacted a third by phone call.
In this case, Chevron removed the lawsuit to a federal district court in Maryland, pointing to eight different grounds for removal. Under federal law, cases filed in state court can be transferred – the technical term is “removed” – to federal court if they meet one of several criteria. Arguments of the oil companies.
The 2017 Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. The FDA is headquartered in Maryland, and that was the office that received the ANDA documents. and probably also in Maryland, but not in N.J. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed.
The city filed its case in a Maryland state court. That is precisely what Chevron did in this case: It transferred the suit to a federal court in Maryland – a procedure known as “removal.” The 4th Circuit ruled that it could review only whether removal was appropriate under the federal officer statute – which, it concluded, it was not.
In a speech at Harvard Law School in 2015, Justice Elena Kagan told the audience that “we’re all textualists now” – that is, that any effort to interpret a statute begins (and often ends) with the language of the statute. That principle may ultimately prove dispositive in BP v. Justice Stephen Breyer appeared unconvinced.
Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate statute, a pharmaceutical manufacturer whose drug prices increase faster than the rate of inflation must pay additional per-unit rebates to the program. The statute defines a “line extension” as a “new formulation” of an existing drug, with certain exceptions. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 23-1457 (4th Cir.
In recent years, the Supreme Court has expressed misgivings about white-collar prosecutions under broadly worded statutes. Judge Gregg Costa, joined by six other judges, wrote that “[t]he Supreme Court’s message is unmistakable: Courts should not assign federal criminal statutes a ‘breathtaking scope’ when a narrower reading is reasonable.”
Maryland , a defendant must show that he could not have obtained the suppressed, exculpatory evidence through his own independent efforts of “self-help” or “due diligence” as the U.S. Issues : (1) Whether spending-clause statutes ever give rise to privately enforceable rights under 42 U.S.C. In Blankenship v. Blankenship v.
The National Marine Fisheries Service construed the governing statute to allow it to require industry to pay the salaries of those monitors. Circuit held that the statute was reasonably read to allow the agency to require industry to pay the cost of federal monitors. A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 17 and Mar.
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. District Court and won, prompting a government appeal to the D.C. In affirming the District Court’s ruling, the D.C.
A federal court in California convicted Hansen of multiple counts of fraud, as well as convincing two of his customers to overstay their visas and participate in his adoption program in violation of the encourage-or-induce statute. Hansen appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. In United States v. Mansfield v.
Kirschenbaum — On March 31, the Federal District Court for the District of Maryland upheld CMS’s definition of a “new formulation” under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP). Under the statute, a line extension is a ‘new formulation” that is not an abuse-deterrent formulation. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MJM-22-977 (Dist.
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure.
In a rare move, Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley has sent letters to Maryland Gov. Hogan: “I would respectfully request that you direct the Maryland State Police to enforce Maryland and Montgomery County laws that squarely prohibit picketing at the homes of Supreme Court Justices who reside in Maryland.”
The issue the court confronted was a procedural matter: Can the defendant energy companies use the federal removal statutes (see 28 USC Section 1442) to remove a state law climate change lawsuit to federal court? In this case, both the Maryland federal district court and the U.S. SUPREME COURT. BP PLC, et al.
The report says that as a consequence of bias in the criminal justice system, the statutes meant to protect racial minorities and marginalized groups are less effective. Hate crime laws in the U.S. Advocates are quoted in the report claiming that existing laws can discourage hate crime victims from coming forward.
When HRSA threatened enforcement action and penalties, several companies sued the HHS in federal district courts in Maryland, Indiana, Delaware, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia to enjoin those enforcement actions (see list below). Because of concerns that these contract pharmacies, which include some of the largest chains in the U.S.,
Kirschenbaum — In November 2020, we blogged about a decision by the Federal District Court of Maryland dismissing a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam suit alleging that Forest Laboratories knowingly reported inflated best prices under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), resulting in underpayment of rebates. Burr , 551 U.S.
permits courts to defer to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ construction of a statute designed to benefit veterans, without first considering the pro-veteran canon of construction; and (2) whether Chevron should be overruled. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 28 and Oct.
By federal statute, sponsors of "electioneering communications" must disclose the names and addresses of each donor who contributed $1000 or more to the sponsoring organization. " Maryland Rep. This is is the provision that led to the US District Court decision at issue.
The Supreme Court has held that the federal government assumes a trust obligation to assert reserved water rights for Native tribes only when it “ expressly accepts those responsibilities by statute ,” by regulation, or by treaty with a tribe. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
A Baltimore City judge issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday to prevent Maryland Governor Larry Hogan from terminating federal unemployment assistance for over 300,000 Maryland residents. Walsh that as of July 3, 2021, Maryland would terminate its participation in the federal unemployment program.
Price Transparency Surveys The MDRP statute requires manufacturers to submit only three prices: average manufacturer price (AMP), best price, and nominal prices. Absent from the statute is any requirement to report information on manufacturer costs and price setting. that is not supported by the statute and applicable regulations.”
For example, the Maryland standing order allows all Maryland licensed pharmacists to dispense naloxone, including any necessary sup??plies By statute, certain activities are automatically excluded from particular DSCSA requirements upon the declaration of a public health emergency under section 319 of the PHS Act.
PJM Interconnection had identified grid congestion across the Pennsylvania-Maryland border and concluded that such congestion had led to approximately $800 million in costs from 2012 to 2016. For instance, in its 2013 report on Policies for a Modern and Reliable U.S.
22-1148 Issue : Whether a worker planted in a business to collect information for their true employer, and who does so in nonpublic areas of the business, is immunized by the First Amendment from an action for trespass and breach of loyalty created by a content-neutral statute of general applicability. Maryland and Napue v.
The statute reads, in relevant part: “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State. Maryland , 378 U.S. ” 42 U.S.C. Quoting Griffin v. 130 (1964).
Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. ” (Emphasis added.) A divided unpublished Fifth District opinion affirmed convictions for lewd acts on a minor and found harmless the superior court’s mistaken interpretation of a sentencing statute. ” Denying review in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v.
Importantly, “price increase” is not defined in this statute. We expect the Minnesota law to face Commerce Clause, vagueness, and possibly other constitutional challenges, similar to those brought against a generic price gouging prohibition in Maryland that was struck down by the Fourth Circuit in 2018 (see our post here ).
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Maryland v. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. The obvious issue beyond the alleged negligence of the Park is the plaintiffs’ own conduct. If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery. Janik (2009).
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Maryland v. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. The obvious issue beyond the alleged negligence of the Park is the plaintiffs’ own conduct. If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery. Janik (2009).
Circuit upheld the regulation, holding that “the disputed rule is consistent with the best interpretation of ‘machine gun’ under the governing statutes.” Maryland and Napue v. In Cargill , the en banc U.S.
Police in Montgomery County, Maryland are investigating a new “Castle Doctrine” case after Harry Trueman Powell, 34, was shot and killed by a homeowner. Since there is no report that Powell was armed, the case is likely to raise Maryland’s Castle Doctrine defense.
The court considered the statutes ambiguous, which meant that under normal principles of Indian Law, they must be construed in favor of the tribe. Maryland ; and (2) whether suppressed impeachment evidence of the state’s key witness is per se non-material under Brady because that witness’ credibility had been otherwise impeached at trial.
Take, for example, the more than 100 cases filed nationally against brand hotelier franchisors beginning in late 2019, for alleged sex trafficking occurring on premise under the same statute. These cases gave way to more filings against Big Tech, namely Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, and others. The remedy should be clear.
In April, the Maryland legislature passed a landmark law called the Child Victims Act, which repealed the statute of limitations and permits survivors of child abuse to file civil lawsuits at any time. The deadline is a compromise between the Feb. The law took effect on Oct.
Fifty sexual abuse survivors have opened a lawsuit against the Maryland government, alleging rampant sexual abuse of young people in six of the states juvenile justice facilities over five decades, Erin Cox and Steve Thompson report for the Washington Post.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content