Minnesota Statute Tort 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 14, 2024
E&E News reports that similar legislation may soon be introduced in California and Minnesota. No federal statutes explicitly preempt state Climate Superfund laws, and different U.S. No federal statutes explicitly preempt state Climate Superfund laws, and different U.S. In a 2021 appellate decision, City of New York v.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 1, 2021
20-219 , asks whether the compensatory damages available under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the statutes that incorporate its remedies, such as the Rehabilitation Act and the Affordable Care Act , include compensation for emotional distress. Fillmore County, Minnesota , 20-7028. Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C. ,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
OCTOBER 7, 2019
The federal district court for the District of South Dakota temporarily enjoined enforcement of provisions of a riot boosting statute enacted in South Dakota in 2019 in response to anticipated protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2021
The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Minnesota Court and D.C. The Minnesota Court of Appeals denied motions to stay the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s decisions authorizing Enbridge Energy, LP’s Line 3 pipeline replacement project. WildEarth Guardians v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 2, 2021
The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline. D076956 (Cal.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. May 10, 2021).
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. A Minnesota trial court granted four environmental activists’ motion to present a necessity defense.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
62 
Let's personalize your content